IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i12p5187-d376149.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Investigation into Stakeholders’ Perception of Smart Campus Criteria: The American University of Sharjah as a Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Vian Ahmed

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O. Box 26666, UAE)

  • Karam Abu Alnaaj

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O. Box 26666, UAE)

  • Sara Saboor

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O. Box 26666, UAE)

Abstract

In recent times, smart cities and sustainable development have drawn significant research attention. Among developed and developing countries, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) has been at the forefront in becoming an incubator for smart cities; in particular, it has placed some efforts in the education sector by transforming the traditional campus into a Smart Campus. As the term Smart Campus attracts professionals and academics from multiple disciplines, and the technology keeps intervening in every aspect of life, it becomes inevitable for the Smart Campus to take place and deploy the future vision of smart cities. As a first step to achieve this vision, it is very important to develop a clear understanding of what is a Smart Campus. To date, there is still no clear perception of what a Smart Campus would look like, or what are the main components that can form a Smart Campus. Therefore, the objective of this research is to use the set of comprehensive criteria to identify what it is perceived to be a Smart Campus and evaluate these criteria from the stakeholders’ perception. The main criteria are defined from the literature review, and a case study is conducted on the American University of Sharjah campus stakeholders (faculty, students, management, and Information Technology (IT)) to assess the designated criteria. This exploratory research relies on both qualitative and quantitative methods to perform the analysis, taking into consideration the perceptions of students, faculty, and IT service providers. Finally, having defined and evaluated the criteria that underpin the Smart Campus framework, a set of recommendations are drawn to guide the utilization of a Smart Campus within higher education settings. This research opens the doors for future studies to gain a deeper insight into the type of decisions that need to be made to transform a traditional campus to a Smart Campus.

Suggested Citation

  • Vian Ahmed & Karam Abu Alnaaj & Sara Saboor, 2020. "An Investigation into Stakeholders’ Perception of Smart Campus Criteria: The American University of Sharjah as a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-24, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:12:p:5187-:d:376149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/12/5187/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/12/5187/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zain Ali & Munam Ali Shah & Ahmad Almogren & Ikram Ud Din & Carsten Maple & Hasan Ali Khattak, 2020. "Named Data Networking for Efficient IoT-based Disaster Management in a Smart Campus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Magis, David & Barrada, Juan Ramon, 2017. "Computerized Adaptive Testing with R: Recent Updates of the Package catR," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 76(c01).
    3. McMahon, Walter W., 2000. "Education and Development: Measuring the Social Benefits," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198292319.
    4. Valia Arnaudova & Todorka Terzieva & Asen Rahnev, 2016. "A Methodological Approach For Implementation Of Adaptive E-Learning," CBU International Conference Proceedings, ISE Research Institute, vol. 4(0), pages 910-917, September.
    5. Antimo Barbato & Cristiana Bolchini & Angela Geronazzo & Elisa Quintarelli & Andrei Palamarciuc & Alessandro Pitì & Cristina Rottondi & Giacomo Verticale, 2016. "Energy Optimization and Management of Demand Response Interactions in a Smart Campus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-20, May.
    6. William Villegas-Ch & Xavier Palacios-Pacheco & Sergio Luján-Mora, 2019. "Application of a Smart City Model to a Traditional University Campus with a Big Data Architecture: A Sustainable Smart Campus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-28, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Radhwan Sneesl & Yusmadi Yah Jusoh & Marzanah A. Jabar & Salfarina Abdullah & Umar Ali Bukar, 2022. "Factors Affecting the Adoption of IoT-Based Smart Campus: An Investigation Using Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Zhaoxi Deng & Kemo Badiane, 2021. "Study on the Status Quo of Smart Campus Construction in Higher Vocational Colleges: The Case of Z School of China’s Guangdong Province," International Journal of Learning and Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 11(2), pages 94103-94103, June.
    3. Abdulrahman O. Al-Youbi & Abdulmonem Al-Hayani & Ali Rizwan & Hani Choudhry, 2020. "Implications of COVID-19 on the Labor Market of Saudi Arabia: The Role of Universities for a Sustainable Workforce," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-13, August.
    4. Francisco Maciá Pérez & José Vicente Berna Martínez & Iren Lorenzo Fonseca, 2021. "Modelling and Implementing Smart Universities: An IT Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-26, March.
    5. Radhwan Sneesl & Yusmadi Yah Jusoh & Marzanah A. Jabar & Salfarina Abdullah, 2022. "Revising Technology Adoption Factors for IoT-Based Smart Campuses: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-27, April.
    6. Pedro Ivo Silva-da-Nóbrega & Adriana Fumi Chim-Miki & Marysol Castillo-Palacio, 2022. "A Smart Campus Framework: Challenges and Opportunities for Education Based on the Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, August.
    7. Diganta Das & Nathaniel Dylan Lim & P Aravind, 2022. "Developing a Smart and Sustainable Campus in Singapore," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, November.
    8. Raghad Almashhour & Fatin Samara, 2022. "Evaluating Livability Perceptions: Indicators to Evaluate Livability of a University Campus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-31, September.
    9. Munthir A. Alblaihed & Usama M. Ibrahem & Ahmed B. Altamimi & Hind R. Alqirnas & Magdy I. Salem, 2022. "Infosphere Is Reshaping: How the Internet of Things Leads Smart Campuses for Knowledge Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. William Villegas-Ch & Jhoann Molina-Enriquez & Carlos Chicaiza-Tamayo & Iván Ortiz-Garcés & Sergio Luján-Mora, 2019. "Application of a Big Data Framework for Data Monitoring on a Smart Campus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-15, October.
    2. William Villegas-Ch & Xavier Palacios-Pacheco & Milton Román-Cañizares, 2020. "Integration of IoT and Blockchain to in the Processes of a University Campus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, June.
    3. Jonek-Kowalska, Izabela & Musioł-Urbańczyk, Anna & Podgórska, Marzena & Wolny, Maciej, 2021. "Does motivation matter in evaluation of research institutions? Evidence from Polish public universities," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    4. Arroyo, Javier & Manna, Carlo & Spiessens, Fred & Helsen, Lieve, 2022. "Reinforced model predictive control (RL-MPC) for building energy management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    5. Elina Tsigeman & Sebastian Silas & Klaus Frieler & Maxim Likhanov & Rebecca Gelding & Yulia Kovas & Daniel Müllensiefen, 2022. "The Jack and Jill Adaptive Working Memory Task: Construction, Calibration and Validation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-29, January.
    6. Hamdani, Nisar Hussain & Shah, Syed Akhter Hussain, 2005. "Earthquake 2005: Some Implications for Environment and Human Capital," MPRA Paper 9519, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Ahmed WA Hammad & Ali Akbarnezhad & Assed Haddad & Elaine Garrido Vazquez, 2019. "Sustainable Zoning, Land-Use Allocation and Facility Location Optimisation in Smart Cities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, April.
    8. Hawon Chu & Jaeseong Kim & Seounghyeon Kim & Young-Kyoon Suh & Ryong Lee & Rae-Young Jang & Minwoo Park, 2020. "ST-Trie: A Novel Indexing Scheme for Efficiently Querying Heterogeneous, Spatiotemporal IoT Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-21, November.
    9. Badr Alsamani & Samir Chatterjee & Ali Anjomshoae & Peter Ractham, 2022. "Smart Space Design–A Framework and an IoT Prototype Implementation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-27, December.
    10. Katarina R. I. Keller, 2006. "Investment In Primary, Secondary, And Higher Education And The Effects On Economic Growth," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 24(1), pages 18-34, January.
    11. Susie Ruqun WU & Gabriela Shirkey & Ilke Celik & Changliang Shao & Jiquan Chen, 2022. "A Review on the Adoption of AI, BC, and IoT in Sustainability Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-25, June.
    12. Katarina R.I. Keller, 2019. "The effects of private social security accounts on economic growth in Eastern Europe," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 39(2), pages 1348-1360.
    13. Israel Edem Agbehadji & Bankole Osita Awuzie & Alfred Beati Ngowi, 2021. "COVID-19 Pandemic Waves: 4IR Technology Utilisation in Multi-Sector Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-20, September.
    14. Li Zhao & Zhi-ying Tang & Xin Zou, 2019. "Mapping the Knowledge Domain of Smart-City Research: A Bibliometric and Scientometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-28, November.
    15. Francisco Maciá Pérez & José Vicente Berna Martínez & Iren Lorenzo Fonseca, 2021. "Modelling and Implementing Smart Universities: An IT Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-26, March.
    16. William Villegas-Ch & Adrián Arias-Navarrete & Xavier Palacios-Pacheco, 2020. "Proposal of an Architecture for the Integration of a Chatbot with Artificial Intelligence in a Smart Campus for the Improvement of Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, February.
    17. William Villegas-Ch. & Santiago Criollo-C & Walter Gaibor-Naranjo & Xavier Palacios-Pacheco, 2022. "Analysis of Data from Surveys for the Identification of the Factors That Influence the Migration of Small Companies to eCommerce," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-22, October.
    18. Kristinn Hermannsson & Patrizio Lecca, 2016. "Human Capital in Economic Development: From Labour Productivity to Macroeconomic Impact," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 35(1), pages 24-36, March.
    19. Mochamad Arief Budihardjo & Bimastyaji Surya Ramadan & Soraya Annisa Putri & Indah Fajarini Sri Wahyuningrum & Fadel Iqbal Muhammad, 2021. "Towards Sustainability in Higher-Education Institutions: Analysis of Contributing Factors and Appropriate Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-14, June.
    20. Katarina Keller, 2006. "Education Expansion, Expenditures per Student and the Effects on Growth in Asia," Global Economic Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 21-42.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:12:p:5187-:d:376149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.