IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i5p1398-d211540.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Changing Abundance and Distribution of the Wintering Swan Goose Anser cygnoides in the Middle and Lower Yangtze River Floodplain: An Investigation Combining a Field Survey with Satellite Telemetry

Author

Listed:
  • An An

    (State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100088, China
    College of Resources and Environment; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Lei Cao

    (State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100088, China
    College of Resources and Environment; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Qiang Jia

    (School of Life Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China)

  • Xin Wang

    (State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100088, China)

  • Qin Zhu

    (School of Life Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China)

  • Junjian Zhang

    (State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100088, China
    College of Resources and Environment; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Xueqin Ye

    (State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100088, China
    College of Resources and Environment; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Dali Gao

    (Authority of East Dongting Lake National Nature Reserve, Yueyang 414000, China)

Abstract

Migratory waterbird communities are quick to respond to ecosystem degradation, and they are widely considered to be important bioindicators of complex environmental changes. The swan goose ( Anser cygnoides ) has been listed as a globally vulnerable species in the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species. This species currently winters almost exclusively in China and is mostly concentrated on lakes in the middle and lower catchment of the Yangtze River floodplain, especially in Poyang Lake, Jiangxi province and some sites in Anhui province. In the past few years, the population of A. cygnoides has fluctuated. To protect this fragile Anatidae species, long-term and accurate population estimation is both necessary and urgent. In this study, we evaluated the change in numbers and distribution of A. cygnoides by comparing surveys conducted in 2004 and 2005 with more recent ones conducted in 2015 and 2016. A reduction in the count number of this species occurred in the survey sites. After a statistical Mann-Whitney U test, the count numbers of A. cygnoides decreased significantly at the survey sites in Anhui province and the abundance decrease at the survey sites in Poyang Lake was only marginally significant. The inaccessibility of the new sites revealed by satellite tracking impeded a more prudent and comprehensive estimate of the population change. Satellite tracking technology may be a tool to consider for increasing the efficiency of data acquisition. Information transmitted from satellite tracking devices can help us to better understand the species’ behavior and wintering habitat. This technology has the potential to substitute costly and time-consuming field surveys. Conservation designs and management plans must be created for specific national nature reserves and key wintering sites. A more efficient long-term species monitoring system with improved spatial coverage should be conducted to safeguard wintering A. cygnoides .

Suggested Citation

  • An An & Lei Cao & Qiang Jia & Xin Wang & Qin Zhu & Junjian Zhang & Xueqin Ye & Dali Gao, 2019. "Changing Abundance and Distribution of the Wintering Swan Goose Anser cygnoides in the Middle and Lower Yangtze River Floodplain: An Investigation Combining a Field Survey with Satellite Telemetry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-15, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:5:p:1398-:d:211540
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/5/1398/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/5/1398/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. de Groot, R. & Stuip, M. & Finlayson, Max & Davidson, N., 2006. "Valuing wetlands: guidance for valuing the benefits derived from wetland ecosystem services," IWMI Research Reports H039735, International Water Management Institute.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu Jian & Wang Xiaoxia & Niu Kunyu, 2010. "Cost-Effectiveness of Policy Options for Sustainable Wetland Conservation: A Case Study of Qixinghe Wetland, China," EEPSEA Research Report rr2010021, Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia (EEPSEA), revised Feb 2010.
    2. Margarita Ignatyeva & Vera Yurak & Alexey Dushin, 2022. "Valuating Natural Resources and Ecosystem Services: Systematic Review of Methods in Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Iniesta-Arandia, Irene & García-Llorente, Marina & Aguilera, Pedro A. & Montes, Carlos & Martín-López, Berta, 2014. "Socio-cultural valuation of ecosystem services: uncovering the links between values, drivers of change, and human well-being," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 36-48.
    4. Sharma, Bikash & Rasul, Golam & Chettri, Nakul, 2015. "The economic value of wetland ecosystem services: Evidence from the Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve, Nepal," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 12(C), pages 84-93.
    5. Langemeyer, Johannes & Baró, Francesc & Roebeling, Peter & Gómez-Baggethun, Erik, 2015. "Contrasting values of cultural ecosystem services in urban areas: The case of park Montjuïc in Barcelona," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 12(C), pages 178-186.
    6. Encarna Esteban & Ariel Dinar, 2013. "Cooperative Management of Groundwater Resources in the Presence of Environmental Externalities," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 54(3), pages 443-469, March.
    7. Ghermandi, Andrea & Sheela, Albert Moses & Justus, Joseph, 2016. "Integrating similarity analysis and ecosystem service value transfer: Results from a tropical coastal wetland in India," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 22(PA), pages 73-82.
    8. Gómez-Baggethun, Erik & Tudor, Marian & Doroftei, Mihai & Covaliov, Silviu & Năstase, Aurel & Onără, Dalia-Florentina & Mierlă, Marian & Marinov, Mihai & Doroșencu, Alexandru-Cătălin & Lupu, G, 2019. "Changes in ecosystem services from wetland loss and restoration: An ecosystem assessment of the Danube Delta (1960–2010)," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    9. Saarikoski, Heli & Mustajoki, Jyri & Hjerppe, Turo & Aapala, Kaisu, 2019. "Participatory multi-criteria decision analysis in valuing peatland ecosystem services—Trade-offs related to peat extraction vs. pristine peatlands in Southern Finland," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 17-28.
    10. Halkos, George & Matsiori, Steriani, 2014. "Exploring social attitude and willingness to pay for water resources conservation," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 54-62.
    11. Eszter Tanács & Ágnes Vári & Ákos Bede-Fazekas & András Báldi & Edina Csákvári & Anett Endrédi & Veronika Fabók & Lívia Kisné Fodor & Márton Kiss & Péter Koncz & Anikó Kovács-Hostyánszki & János Mészá, 2023. "Finding the Green Grass in the Haystack? Integrated National Assessment of Ecosystem Services and Condition in Hungary, in Support of Conservation and Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-28, May.
    12. Parks, Sarah & Gowdy, John, 2013. "What have economists learned about valuing nature? A review essay," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 3(C), pages 1-10.
    13. Everard, Mark & Harrington, Rory & McInnes, Robert J., 2012. "Facilitating implementation of landscape-scale water management: The integrated constructed wetland concept," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 2(C), pages 27-37.
    14. Edoardo Croci & Benedetta Lucchitta & Tommaso Penati, 2021. "Valuing Ecosystem Services at the Urban Level: A Critical Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, January.
    15. Maynard, S. & James, D. & Davidson, A., 2015. "Determining the value of multiple ecosystem services in terms of community wellbeing: Who should be the valuing agent?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 22-28.
    16. Halkos, George, 2013. "The relationship between people’s attitude and willingness to pay for river conservation," MPRA Paper 50560, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Andrea Ghermandi & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & Luke M. Brander & Henri L.F. de Groot & Paulo A.L.D. Nunes, 2009. "The Values of Natural and Constructed Wetlands: A Meta-Analysis," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 09-080/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    18. Wadood, Syed Naimul & Ali, Ayub, 2016. "Economic Valuation of Rural Wetlands and Household Food Security: A Case Study from the North-West Bangladesh," MPRA Paper 77068, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:5:p:1398-:d:211540. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.