IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i24p7014-d295644.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identification and Location of a Transitional Zone between an Urban and a Rural Area Using Fuzzy Set Theory, CLC, and HRL Data

Author

Listed:
  • Andrzej Biłozor

    (Institute of Geoinformation and Cartography, Faculty of Geodesy, Geospatial and Civil Engineering, University of Warmia Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-720 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Szymon Czyża

    (Institute of Geoinformation and Cartography, Faculty of Geodesy, Geospatial and Civil Engineering, University of Warmia Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-720 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Tomasz Bajerowski

    (Institute of Geoinformation and Cartography, Faculty of Geodesy, Geospatial and Civil Engineering, University of Warmia Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-720 Olsztyn, Poland)

Abstract

Changes in land use, which accompany the development of towns, generate a transitional zone on the border between areas of urban and rural use, which—due to its complex (unspecified, fuzzy) land use—cannot be identified either as a rural or an urban area. In order to prevent the unplanned development, it should go according to plan, in line with the spatial order principles, making a coherent whole, taking into account all functional, socio-economic, cultural, as well as aesthetic factors and requirements. This paper describes studies and analyses of the fuzzy set theory applicability in studies of land use in areas around towns. The main aim of the study was to present the methodology, which employs fuzzy logic to identify and locate a transitional zone between rural and urban areas. This study dealt with the transitional zone at the junction of the urban and rural area and its parameters, which affect the type of land use. The attributes of the transitional zone were defined based on an analysis of current land use methods in areas under direct urbanisation pressure. The study was conducted in the city of Olsztyn (Poland) and on its outskirts, directly exposed to the impact of the developing city, with an area of 202.4 km 2 , within an 8-km radius of the city centre. The study determined the impact of individual forms of land use on the development of urban or rural use. The degree of each type of use—urban or rural—allowed for developing a fuzzy town and country model, identifying the urban investment border and its spatial dispersion, as well as identifying and locating the transitional zone between urban and rural areas. Moreover, land cover models based on the Corine land cover (CLC) data as well as high-resolution layers (HRL) impervious and canopy data were developed. The borders of urban investment determined on the basis of the fuzzy set theory assumptions, CLC, and HRL data were also identified and verified.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrzej Biłozor & Szymon Czyża & Tomasz Bajerowski, 2019. "Identification and Location of a Transitional Zone between an Urban and a Rural Area Using Fuzzy Set Theory, CLC, and HRL Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-20, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:24:p:7014-:d:295644
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/7014/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/7014/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pu Hao & Stan Geertman & Pieter Hooimeijer & Richard Sliuzas, 2012. "The Land-Use Diversity in Urban Villages in Shenzhen," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(11), pages 2742-2764, November.
    2. Angela Heymans & Jessica Breadsell & Gregory M. Morrison & Joshua J. Byrne & Christine Eon, 2019. "Ecological Urban Planning and Design: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Yasser Ebrahimian Ghajari & Ali Asghar Alesheikh & Mahdi Modiri & Reza Hosnavi & Morteza Abbasi, 2017. "Spatial Modelling of Urban Physical Vulnerability to Explosion Hazards Using GIS and Fuzzy MCDA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-29, July.
    4. Malgorzata Renigier-Bilozor & Andrzej Bilozor, 2015. "Optimization Of The Variables Selection In The Process Of Real Estate Markets Rating," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 6(4), pages 139-157, December.
    5. Malgorzata Renigier-Bilozor & Andrzej Bilozor, 2015. "Optimization of the variables selection in the process of real estate markets rating," Working Papers 24/2015, Institute of Economic Research, revised Mar 2015.
    6. Ellen M. Hoffmann & Monish Jose & Nils Nölke & Thomas Möckel, 2017. "Construction and Use of a Simple Index of Urbanisation in the Rural–Urban Interface of Bangalore, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-21, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Szymon Czyża & Karol Szuniewicz & Iwona Cieślak & Andrzej Biłozor & Tomasz Bajerowski, 2023. "An Analysis of the Spatial Development of European Cities Based on Their Geometry and the CORINE Land Cover (CLC) Database," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Urszula Myga-Piątek & Anna Żemła-Siesicka & Katarzyna Pukowiec-Kurda & Michał Sobala & Jerzy Nita, 2021. "Is There Urban Landscape in Metropolitan Areas? An Unobvious Answer Based on Corine Land Cover Analyses," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Andrzej Biłozor & Iwona Cieślak, 2021. "Review of Experience in Recent Studies on the Dynamics of Land Urbanisation," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-27, October.
    4. Olczak, Barbara & Wilkosz-mamcarczyk, Magdalena & Prus, Barbara & Hodor, Katarzyna & Dixon-gough, Robert, 2022. "Application of the building cohesion method in spatial planning to shape patterns of the development in a suburban historical landscape of a 'village within Kraków'," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    5. Bieda, Agnieszka & Dybał, Łukasz, 2021. "Assessing correctness of local spatial policy using information on commencement of construction investment process," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    6. Renigier-Biłozor, Małgorzata & Źróbek, Sabina & Walacik, Marek & Borst, Richard & Grover, Richard & d’Amato, Maurizio, 2022. "International acceptance of automated modern tools use must-have for sustainable real estate market development," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrzej Biłozor & Iwona Cieślak, 2021. "Review of Experience in Recent Studies on the Dynamics of Land Urbanisation," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-27, October.
    2. Linda Steinhübel & Johannes Wegmann & Oliver Mußhoff, 2020. "Digging deep and running dry—the adoption of borewell technology in the face of climate change and urbanization," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(5), pages 685-706, September.
    3. Miaoxi Zhao & Yanliu Lin & Huiqin Wang, 2022. "Locational Differences of Collective Land and Their Socioeconomic Effects on the Rural Elderly in China’s Pearl River Delta," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Jackie Parker & Greg D. Simpson, 2020. "A Theoretical Framework for Bolstering Human-Nature Connections and Urban Resilience via Green Infrastructure," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Pu Hao & Shuangshuang Tang, 2015. "Floating or settling down: the effect of rural landholdings on the settlement intention of rural migrants in urban China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 47(9), pages 1979-1999, September.
    6. Wegmann, Johannes & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2019. "Groundwater management institutions in the face of rapid urbanization – Results of a framed field experiment in Bengaluru, India," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Su Wang & Huaidong He & Qingqing Xiao, 2023. "Coupling Study of Urban Ecological Planning and Environmental Music in Hefei University Town, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-14, May.
    8. Long Zhou & Guoqiang Shen & Yao Wu & Robert Brown & Tian Chen & Chenyu Wang, 2018. "Urban Form, Growth, and Accessibility in Space and Time: Anatomy of Land Use at the Parcel-Level in a Small to Medium-Sized American City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-24, December.
    9. Purushotham, Anjali & Steinhübel, Linda, 2021. "You Eat What You Work – Livelihood Strategies and Nutrition in the Rural-Urban Interface," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315247, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Ghazaleh Ahmadi & Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam & Armand Baboli & Mehdi Najafi, 2022. "A decision support model for robust allocation and routing of search and rescue resources after earthquake: a case study," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 1039-1081, April.
    11. Seyed Mohammad Haghighi Fard & Naciye Doratli, 2022. "Evaluation of Resilience in Historic Urban Areas by Combining Multi-Criteria Decision-Making System and GIS, with Sustainability and Regeneration Approach: The Case Study of Tehran (IRAN)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, February.
    12. Yani Lai & Edwin Hon Wan Chan & Lennon Choy, 2017. "Village-led land development under state-led institutional arrangements in urbanising China: The case of Shenzhen," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(7), pages 1736-1759, May.
    13. Zhanqiang Zhu & Wei Lang & Xiaofang Tao & Jiali Feng & Kai Liu, 2019. "Exploring the Quality of Urban Green Spaces Based on Urban Neighborhood Green Index—A Case Study of Guangzhou City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-17, October.
    14. Mohammad Reza Rahdari & Andrés Rodríguez-Seijo, 2021. "Monitoring Sand Drift Potential and Sand Dune Mobility over the Last Three Decades (Khartouran Erg, Sabzevar, NE Iran)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-16, August.
    15. Yanliu Lin & Pu Hao & Stan Geertman, 2015. "A conceptual framework on modes of governance for the regeneration of Chinese ‘villages in the city’," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(10), pages 1774-1790, August.
    16. Pranav Gupta & Alka Bharat, 2022. "Developing sustainable development Index as a tool for appropriate urban land take," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(11), pages 13378-13406, November.
    17. Preusse, Verena & Wollni, Meike, 2021. "Adoption of Sustainable Agricultural Practices in the Context of Urbanisation and Environmental Stress – Evidence from Farmers in the Rural-Urban Interface of Bangalore, India," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315159, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. Marica Cassarino & Sina Shahab & Sara Biscaya, 2021. "Envisioning Happy Places for All: A Systematic Review of the Impact of Transformations in the Urban Environment on the Wellbeing of Vulnerable Groups," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-14, July.
    19. Yani Lai & Lin Jiang & Xiaoxiao Xu, 2021. "Exploring Spatio-Temporal Patterns of Urban Village Redevelopment: The Case of Shenzhen, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-26, September.
    20. Quntao Yang & Shuliang Zhang & Qiang Dai & Rui Yao, 2020. "Assessment of Community Vulnerability to Different Types of Urban Floods: A Case for Lishui City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-19, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:24:p:7014-:d:295644. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.