IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i21p6123-d283085.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Emotionally Intelligent People More Creative? A Meta-Analysis of the Emotional Intelligence–Creativity Link

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaobo Xu

    (School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China)

  • Wenling Liu

    (Institute of General Education, Shanghai Academy of Educational Sciences, Shanghai 200032, China)

  • Weiguo Pang

    (School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China)

Abstract

Although emotional intelligence (EI) is positively associated with beneficial outcomes such as higher job performance and better psychological well-being, its relationship with creativity is uncertain. To assess an overall correlation between EI and creativity, in the present study a meta-analysis of 96 correlations obtained from 75 studies with a total sample size of 18,130 was conducted. The results uncovered a statistically significant moderate correlation (r = 0.32, 95% CI, 0.26–0.38, p < 0.01) between these two constructs. Moderation analyses revealed that the link was modulated by the type of EI/creativity measure and sample characteristics, such as gender, employment status, and culture. Specifically, the link was stronger when EI and creativity were measured using subjective reports (EI: trait EI; creativity: creative behavior and creative personality) compared to objective tests (EI: ability EI; creativity: divergent thinking test, remote associate test, and creative product). In addition, the link was stronger in males compared to females, in employees compared to students, and in East Asian samples compared to Western European and American samples. Theoretical implications and future directions are discussed in detail.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaobo Xu & Wenling Liu & Weiguo Pang, 2019. "Are Emotionally Intelligent People More Creative? A Meta-Analysis of the Emotional Intelligence–Creativity Link," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-26, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:21:p:6123-:d:283085
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/21/6123/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/21/6123/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ebru Gozukara, 2016. "Beyond the Expected Activities: The Role of Impulsivity between Emotional Intelligence and Employee Creativity," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(3), pages 143-153, March.
    2. Sue Duval & Richard Tweedie, 2000. "Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel-Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 56(2), pages 455-463, June.
    3. Xuanfang Hou & Wenqi Li & Qiao Yuan, 2018. "Frontline disruptive leadership and new generation employees’ innovative behaviour in China: the moderating role of emotional intelligence," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 459-471, August.
    4. Viechtbauer, Wolfgang, 2010. "Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 36(i03).
    5. Robert G. Orwin, 1983. "A Fail-SafeN for Effect Size in Meta-Analysis," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 8(2), pages 157-159, June.
    6. Md. Hassan Jafri & Chimi Dem & Sonam Choden, 2016. "Emotional Intelligence and Employee Creativity: Moderating Role of Proactive Personality and Organizational Climate," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 4(1), pages 54-66, January.
    7. Blair Kidwell & David M. Hardesty & Terry L. Childers, 2008. "Consumer Emotional Intelligence: Conceptualization, Measurement, and the Prediction of Consumer Decision Making," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 35(1), pages 154-166, November.
    8. See-Kwong Goh & Kang-Yi Lim, 2014. "Perceived Creativity: The Role of Emotional Intelligence and Knowledge Sharing Behaviour," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(04), pages 1-10.
    9. Rodrigo Lozano, 2014. "Creativity and Organizational Learning as Means to Foster Sustainability," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(3), pages 205-216, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qichao Zhang & Zhenzhong Ma & Long Ye & Ming Guo & Shuzhen Liu, 2021. "Future Work Self and Employee Creativity: The Mediating Role of Informal Field-Based Learning for High Innovation Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Altinay, Levent & Kinali Madanoglu, Gulsevim & Kromidha, Endrit & Nurmagambetova, Armiyash & Madanoglu, Melih, 2021. "Mental aspects of cultural intelligence and self-creativity of nascent entrepreneurs: The mediating role of emotionality," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 793-802.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stav Fainshmidt & Amir Pezeshkan & M. Lance Frazier & Anil Nair & Edward Markowski, 2016. "Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Performance: A Meta-Analytic Evaluation and Extension," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(8), pages 1348-1380, December.
    2. Bart Verkuil & Serpil Atasayi & Marc L Molendijk, 2015. "Workplace Bullying and Mental Health: A Meta-Analysis on Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Augusteijn, Hilde Elisabeth Maria & van Aert, Robbie Cornelis Maria & van Assen, Marcel A. L. M., 2021. "Posterior Probabilities of Effect Sizes and Heterogeneity in Meta-Analysis: An Intuitive Approach of Dealing with Publication Bias," OSF Preprints avkgj, Center for Open Science.
    4. Georgiou, George K. & Guo, Kan & Naveenkumar, Nithya & Vieira, Ana Paula Alves & Das, J.P., 2020. "PASS theory of intelligence and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    5. Maurizio Canavari & Andreas C. Drichoutis & Jayson L. Lusk & Rodolfo M. Nayga, Jr., 2018. "How to run an experimental auction: A review of recent advances," Working Papers 2018-5, Agricultural University of Athens, Department Of Agricultural Economics.
    6. Nian-Feng Wan & Liwan Fu & Matteo Dainese & Yue-Qing Hu & Lars Pødenphant Kiær & Forest Isbell & Christoph Scherber, 2022. "Plant genetic diversity affects multiple trophic levels and trophic interactions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Kim, Yeolib & Kim, Seung Hyun & Peterson, Robert A. & Choi, Jeonghye, 2023. "Privacy concern and its consequences: A meta-analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    8. K. Praveen Parboteeah & Matthias Weiss & Martin Hoegl, 2024. "Ethical Climates Across National Contexts: A Meta-Analytical Investigation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(3), pages 573-590, January.
    9. Woodley of Menie, Michael A. & Peñaherrera-Aguirre, Mateo & Sarraf, Matthew A., 2022. "Signs of a Flynn effect in rodents? Secular differentiation of the manifold of general cognitive ability in laboratory mice (Mus musculus) and Norwegian rats (Rattus norvegicus) over a century—Results," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    10. Jaskiewicz, Peter & Block, Joern & Wagner, Dominik & Carney, Michael & Hansen, Christopher, 2021. "How do cross-country differences in institutional trust and trust in family explain the mixed performance effects of family management? A meta-analysis," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 56(5).
    11. Anouk Decuypere & Wilmar Schaufeli, 2021. "Exploring the Leadership–Engagement Nexus: A Moderated Meta-Analysis and Review of Explaining Mechanisms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-34, August.
    12. Haiko Schurz & Michelle Daya & Marlo Möller & Eileen G Hoal & Muneeb Salie, 2015. "TLR1, 2, 4, 6 and 9 Variants Associated with Tuberculosis Susceptibility: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-24, October.
    13. Kadykalo, Andrew N. & Findlay, C. Scott, 2016. "The flow regulation services of wetlands," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 91-103.
    14. Mattia Marchi & Antonio Travascio & Daniele Uberti & Edoardo De Micheli & Fabio Quartaroli & Giuseppe Laquatra & Pietro Grenzi & Luca Pingani & Silvia Ferrari & Andrea Fiorillo & Manlio Converti & Fed, 2024. "Microaggression toward LGBTIQ people and implications for mental health: A systematic review," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 70(1), pages 23-35, February.
    15. Lang, Jessica & Ochsmann, Elke & Kraus, Thomas & Lang, Jonas W.B., 2012. "Psychosocial work stressors as antecedents of musculoskeletal problems: A systematic review and meta-analysis of stability-adjusted longitudinal studies," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(7), pages 1163-1174.
    16. David B. Yaden & Cassondra L. Batz-Barbarich & Vincent Ng & Hoda Vaziri & Jessica N. Gladstone & James O. Pawelski & Louis Tay, 2022. "A Meta-Analysis of Religion/Spirituality and Life Satisfaction," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(8), pages 4147-4163, December.
    17. Sergio Nolazco & Kaspar Delhey & Shinichi Nakagawa & Anne Peters, 2022. "Ornaments are equally informative in male and female birds," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    18. Friederike Teetzen & Paul-Christian Bürkner & Sabine Gregersen & Sylvie Vincent-Höper, 2022. "The Mediating Effects of Work Characteristics on the Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Employee Well-Being: A Meta-Analytic Investigation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-26, March.
    19. Tsung-Yuan Hsiao & Wen-Ta Tseng, 2022. "A Meta-Analysis of Test-Retest Reliability in Language Anxiety Research: Is Language Anxiety Stable or Variable?," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, November.
    20. Alessandra Perra & Chiara Laura Riccardo & Valerio De Lorenzo & Erika De Marco & Lorenzo Di Natale & Peter Konstantin Kurotschka & Antonio Preti & Mauro Giovanni Carta, 2023. "Fully Immersive Virtual Reality-Based Cognitive Remediation for Adults with Psychosocial Disabilities: A Systematic Scoping Review of Methods Intervention Gaps and Meta-Analysis of Published Effective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-13, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:21:p:6123-:d:283085. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.