IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i16p4459-d258567.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Opinion Mining on Social Media Data: Sentiment Analysis of User Preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Vasile-Daniel Păvăloaia

    (Department of Accounting, Business Information Systems and Statistics, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, 700506 Iaşi, Romania)

  • Elena-Mădălina Teodor

    (Web Department, Falcon Trading Company, 700521 Iaşi, Romania)

  • Doina Fotache

    (Department of Accounting, Business Information Systems and Statistics, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, 700506 Iaşi, Romania)

  • Magdalena Danileţ

    (Department of Management, Marketing and Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, 700506 Iaşi, Romania)

Abstract

Any brand’s presence on social networks has a significant impact on emotional reactions of its users to different types of posts on social media (SM). If a company understands the preferred types of posts (photo or video) of its customers, based on their reactions, it could make use of these preferences in designing its future communication strategy. The study examines how the use of SM technology and customer-centric management systems could contribute to sustainable business development of companies by means of social customer relationship management (sCRM). The two companies included in the study provide a general consumer good in the beverage industry. As such, it may be said that users interacting with the posts these companies make on their official channels are in fact customers or potential customers. The study aims to analyze customer reaction to two types of posts (photos or videos) on six social networks: Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Pinterest, Google+ and Youtube. It brings evidence on the differences and similarities between the SM customer behaviors of two highly competitive brands in the beverage industry. Drawing on current literature on SM, sCRM and marketing, the output of this study is the conceptualization and measurement of a brand’s SM ability to understand customer preferences for different types of posts by using various statistical tools and the sentiment analysis (SA) technique applied to big sets of data.

Suggested Citation

  • Vasile-Daniel Păvăloaia & Elena-Mădălina Teodor & Doina Fotache & Magdalena Danileţ, 2019. "Opinion Mining on Social Media Data: Sentiment Analysis of User Preferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-21, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:16:p:4459-:d:258567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/16/4459/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/16/4459/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaplan, Andreas M. & Haenlein, Michael, 2010. "Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 59-68, January.
    2. Anonymous, 2013. "Introduction to the Issue," Journal of Wine Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 243-243, December.
    3. Kietzmann, Jan H. & Hermkens, Kristopher & McCarthy, Ian P. & Silvestre, Bruno S., 2011. "Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 241-251, May.
    4. Anonymous, 2013. "Introduction to the Issue," Journal of Wine Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(2), pages 129-130, November.
    5. Jose Ramon Saura & Pedro Palos-Sanchez & Antonio Grilo, 2019. "Detecting Indicators for Startup Business Success: Sentiment Analysis Using Text Data Mining," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, February.
    6. En-Gir Kim & Se-Hak Chun, 2019. "Analyzing Online Car Reviews Using Text Mining," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-22, March.
    7. Umit Can & Bilal Alatas, 2017. "Big Social Network Data and Sustainable Economic Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-19, November.
    8. Berny Carrera & Jae-Yoon Jung, 2018. "SentiFlow: An Information Diffusion Process Discovery Based on Topic and Sentiment from Online Social Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    9. Brodie, Roderick J. & Ilic, Ana & Juric, Biljana & Hollebeek, Linda, 2013. "Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: An exploratory analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 105-114.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laith T. Khrais, 2020. "Role of Artificial Intelligence in Shaping Consumer Demand in E-Commerce," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Ismail Badache & Adrian-Gabriel Chifu & Sébastien Fournier, 2022. "Unsupervised and Supervised Methods to Estimate Temporal-Aware Contradictions in Online Course Reviews," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-24, March.
    3. Carlos Ruiz-Núñez & Ivan Herrera-Peco & Silvia María Campos-Soler & Álvaro Carmona-Pestaña & Elvira Benítez de Gracia & Juan José Peña Deudero & Andrés Ignacio García-Notario, 2023. "Sentiment Analysis on Twitter: Role of Healthcare Professionals in the Global Conversation during the AstraZeneca Vaccine Suspension," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-13, January.
    4. Irina Kalabikhina & Vadim Moshkin & Anton Kolotusha & Maksim Kashin & German Klimenko & Zarina Kazbekova, 2024. "Advancing Semantic Classification: A Comprehensive Examination of Machine Learning Techniques in Analyzing Russian-Language Patient Reviews," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, February.
    5. Myriam Caratù & Valerio Brescia & Ilaria Pigliautile & Paolo Biancone, 2023. "Assessing Energy Communities’ Awareness on Social Media with a Content and Sentiment Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-28, April.
    6. Magdalena Roszczyńska-Kurasińska & Anna Domaradzka & Bartosz Ślosarski & Agata Żbikowska, 2021. "Facebook Data as Part of Cultural Heritage Investments Toolbox: Pilot Analysis of Users Interests and Preferences Concerning Adaptive Reuse," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.
    7. Johannes Hangl & Viktoria Joy Behrens & Simon Krause, 2022. "Barriers, Drivers, and Social Considerations for AI Adoption in Supply Chain Management: A Tertiary Study," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-22, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ravneet Singh Bhandari & Ajay Bansal, 2018. "A Comparison of Psychological and Socio-economic Factors Affecting Individual User’s Social Media Behaviour," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 7(2), pages 126-134, June.
    2. Ashish K. Rathore & Arpan K. Kar & P. Vigneswara Ilavarasan, 2017. "Social Media Analytics: Literature Review and Directions for Future Research," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 14(4), pages 229-249, December.
    3. Neirotti, Paolo & Raguseo, Elisabetta & Paolucci, Emilio, 2016. "Are customers’ reviews creating value in the hospitality industry? Exploring the moderating effects of market positioning," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1133-1143.
    4. Lin, Xiaolin & Kishore, Rajiv, 2021. "Social media-enabled healthcare: A conceptual model of social media affordances, online social support, and health behaviors and outcomes," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    5. Torres de Oliveira, Rui & Indulska, Marta & Steen, John & Verreynne, Martie-Louise, 2020. "Towards a framework for innovation in retailing through social media," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    6. Mirela KOCI, 2017. "Stress Analysis of Composite Materials Used for Yacht Production Through Solid Work Simulation," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 3, September.
    7. Natalia Levina & Manuel Arriaga, 2014. "Distinction and Status Production on User-Generated Content Platforms: Using Bourdieu’s Theory of Cultural Production to Understand Social Dynamics in Online Fields," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 468-488, September.
    8. Tajvidi, Mina & Richard, Marie-Odile & Wang, YiChuan & Hajli, Nick, 2020. "Brand co-creation through social commerce information sharing: The role of social media," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 476-486.
    9. Emanuela Jurietti & Andreina Mandelli & Morana Fudurić, 2017. "How do virtual corporate social responsibility dialogs generate value? A case study of The Unilever Sustainable Living Lab," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(5), pages 357-367, September.
    10. Chung, Alexander Q.H. & Andreev, Pavel & Benyoucef, Morad & Duane, Aidan & O’Reilly, Philip, 2017. "Managing an organisation’s social media presence: An empirical stages of growth model," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 1405-1417.
    11. Wu He & Feng-Kwei Wang, 2016. "A process-based framework of using social media to support innovation process," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 263-277, September.
    12. Faseeh Amin Beig & Mohammad Furqan Khan, 2018. "Impact of Social Media Marketing on Brand Experience: A Study of Select Apparel Brands on Facebook," Vision, , vol. 22(3), pages 264-275, September.
    13. Chung, Alexander Q.H. & Andreev, Pavel & Benyoucef, Morad & Duane, Aidan & O’Reilly, Philip, 2018. "Where the shoe pinches: Realizing dominant problems as an organizational social media business profile evolves," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 33-49.
    14. Delalić, Elma & Turulja, Lejla & Bajgorić, Nijaz, 2019. "Social Media in the Workplace: To Allow It or Not to Allow It?," Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference (2019), Rovinj, Croatia, in: Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference, Rovinj, Croatia, 12-14 September 2019, pages 449-458, IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, Zagreb.
    15. Habibi, Mohammad Reza & Laroche, Michel & Richard, Marie-Odile, 2014. "Brand communities based in social media: How unique are they? Evidence from two exemplary brand communities," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 123-132.
    16. Muhammed Kursad Ozlen, 2021. "Managers’ Attitude and Organizational Culture for Social Media Use in Supply Chain Efficiency and Responsiveness," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 20(3), pages 477-493, September.
    17. Kamboj, Shampy & Sarmah, Bijoylaxmi & Gupta, Shivam & Dwivedi, Yogesh, 2018. "Examining branding co-creation in brand communities on social media: Applying the paradigm of Stimulus-Organism-Response," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 169-185.
    18. Singh, Akansha & Pathak, Govind Swaroop, 2020. "The quest for consumer engagement via cause-related marketing: A mixed method study in an emerging economy," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    19. Bento, Marisa & Martinez, Luisa M. & Martinez, Luis F., 2018. "Brand engagement and search for brands on social media: Comparing Generations X and Y in Portugal," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 234-241.
    20. Wider, Serena & von Wallpach, Sylvia & Mühlbacher, Hans, 2018. "Brand management: Unveiling the delusion of control," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 301-305.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:16:p:4459-:d:258567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.