IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i15p4209-d254642.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measurement and Spatial Difference Analysis on the Accessibility of Road Networks in Major Cities of China

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaorui Zhang

    (Department of Urban Planning, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
    Laboratory of Digital Human Habitat Studies, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China)

  • Andong Ren

    (Department of Urban Planning, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China)

  • Lihua Chen

    (Department of Architecture, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China)

  • Xianyou Zheng

    (Department of Architecture, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China)

Abstract

Given the current lack of accessibility research on road networks in 36 major cities in China, the accessibility and its spatial difference were measured by using space syntax and Moran index. The purpose is to provide an important decision-making basis for the Chinese government to grasp the accessibility level of China’s urban roads in general and formulate urban traffic development policies. The results show that the mean value of the global integration average is only 1.0009, indicating that the accessibility level is not optimistic in general. The accessibility of 36 major cities was divided into four levels: very low, low, high, and very high. Only four cities, namely Beijing, Shijiazhuang, Xi’an, and Zhengzhou, were at a very high level. The spatial differences of accessibility presented a spatial pattern of "middle-high, east-middle, and west-low". The global integration average, intelligibility, and synergy had significant global spatial autocorrelation, while the local spatial agglomeration distributions of these three indexes were dominated by high-high types. The five cities of Beijing, Shijiazhuang, Hohhot, Taiyuan, and Zhengzhou constituted the core area of high-value clustering of local spatial autocorrelation and presented a spatial form of inverted "T" shape. The research still has some limitations. The reasons for the low accessibility of developed cities, such as Guangzhou and Nanjing, are worth further analysis. Besides, the main possible influencing factors affecting accessibility, such as urban road density and spatial form, are also worthy of further analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaorui Zhang & Andong Ren & Lihua Chen & Xianyou Zheng, 2019. "Measurement and Spatial Difference Analysis on the Accessibility of Road Networks in Major Cities of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-15, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:15:p:4209-:d:254642
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/15/4209/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/15/4209/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chenxi Li & Xing Gao & Bao-Jie He & Jingyao Wu & Kening Wu, 2019. "Coupling Coordination Relationships between Urban-industrial Land Use Efficiency and Accessibility of Highway Networks: Evidence from Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-23, March.
    2. Michael Batty, 2001. "Exploring Isovist Fields: Space and Shape in Architectural and Urban Morphology," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 28(1), pages 123-150, February.
    3. Gabriele Nolè & Rosa Lasaponara & Antonio Lanorte & Beniamino Murgante, 2014. "Quantifying Urban Sprawl with Spatial Autocorrelation Techniques using Multi-Temporal Satellite Data," International Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Information Systems (IJAEIS), IGI Global, vol. 5(2), pages 19-37, April.
    4. Xingchuan Gao & Tao Li & Xiaoshu Cao, 2019. "Spatial Fairness and Changes in Transport Infrastructure in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Area from 1976 to 2016," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuan Shi & Alexis Kai-Hon Lau & Edward Ng & Hung-Chak Ho & Muhammad Bilal, 2021. "A Multiscale Land Use Regression Approach for Estimating Intraurban Spatial Variability of PM 2.5 Concentration by Integrating Multisource Datasets," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Lin Lin & Xueming (Jimmy) Chen & Anne Vernez Moudon, 2021. "Measuring the Urban Forms of Shanghai’s City Center and Its New Districts: A Neighborhood-Level Comparative Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Xuesong Sun & Zaisheng Zhang, 2021. "Coupling and Coordination Level of the Population, Land, Economy, Ecology and Society in the Process of Urbanization: Measurement and Spatial Differentiation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Hui Shi & Zhen You & Zhiming Feng & Yanzhao Yang, 2019. "Numerical Simulation and Spatial Distribution of Transportation Accessibility in the Regions Involved in the Belt and Road Initiative," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-14, November.
    5. Ali Soltani & Andrew Allan & Masoud Javadpoor & Jaswanth Lella, 2022. "Space Syntax in Analysing Bicycle Commuting Routes in Inner Metropolitan Adelaide," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-13, March.
    6. Ying Liu & Han Gu & Yuyu Shi, 2022. "Spatial Accessibility Analysis of Medical Facilities Based on Public Transportation Networks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Meng-Ting Tsai & Hung-Wen Chang, 2023. "Contribution of Accessibility to Urban Resilience and Evacuation Planning Using Spatial Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-17, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mengzhi Zou & Changyou Li & Yanni Xiong, 2022. "Analysis of Coupling Coordination Relationship between the Accessibility and Economic Linkage of a High-Speed Railway Network Case Study in Hunan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Jingyi Wang & Kaisi Sun & Jiupai Ni & Deti Xie, 2020. "Evaluation and Factor Analysis of the Intensive Use of Urban Land Based on Technical Efficiency Measurement—A Case Study of 38 Districts and Counties in Chongqing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Yang Tang & Yongbo Yuan & Qingyu Zhong, 2021. "Evaluation of Land Comprehensive Carrying Capacity and Spatio-Temporal Analysis of the Harbin-Changchun Urban Agglomeration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-19, January.
    4. Weijuan Li & Pengcheng Zhang, 2021. "Investigating the transformation efficiency of scientific and technological achievements in China’s equipment manufacturing industry under the low-carbon economy [Environment policy and technologic," International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 135-145.
    5. Mengchao Yao & Yihua Zhang, 2021. "Evaluation and Optimization of Urban Land-Use Efficiency: A Case Study in Sichuan Province of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    6. Myagmartseren Purevtseren & Bazarkhand Tsegmid & Myagmarjav Indra & Munkhnaran Sugar, 2018. "The Fractal Geometry of Urban Land Use: The Case of Ulaanbaatar City, Mongolia," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-14, May.
    7. Xinqing Wang & Tao Pan & Ruoyi Pan & Wenfeng Chi & Chen Ma & Letian Ning & Xiaoyu Wang & Jiacheng Zhang, 2022. "Impact of Land Transition on Landscape and Ecosystem Service Value in Northeast Region of China from 2000–2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, May.
    8. Chenxi Li & Kening Wu, 2022. "An input–output analysis of transportation equipment manufacturing industrial transfer: Evidence from Beijing‐Tianjin‐Hebei region, China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(1), pages 91-111, March.
    9. Gao, Deng & Li, Shicheng, 2022. "Spatiotemporal impact of railway network in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau on accessibility and economic linkages during 1984–2030," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    10. Urszula Myga-Piątek & Anna Żemła-Siesicka & Katarzyna Pukowiec-Kurda & Michał Sobala & Jerzy Nita, 2021. "Is There Urban Landscape in Metropolitan Areas? An Unobvious Answer Based on Corine Land Cover Analyses," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, January.
    11. Haining Luo & Yongsheng Qian & Junwei Zeng & Xuting Wei & Xiaoping Guang, 2022. "An Empirical Analysis of Logistics Corridors and Regional Economic Spatial Patterns from the Perspective of Compressive Transportation between Urban Agglomerations," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-15, May.
    12. Wenfang Pu & Anlu Zhang & Lanjiao Wen, 2021. "Can China’s Resource-Saving and Environmentally Friendly Society Really Improve the Efficiency of Industrial Land Use?," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    13. Xiaorui Guo & Lifeng Wu & Meng Wang, 2022. "Application of Grey Lotka-Volterra Model in Water-Economy-Industry-Technology Innovation System in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-24, July.
    14. Tong Tong & Norzalina Binti Zainudin & Jingwen Yan & Azmawani Abd Rahman, 2023. "The Impact of Industry Clusters on the Performance of High Technology Small and Middle Size Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-16, June.
    15. Yanan Zhang & Hongke Xu & Qing-Chang Lu & Shan Lin & Jiacheng Song, 2023. "Vulnerability Analysis of Bus Network Based on Land-Use Type of Bus Stops: The Case of Xi’an, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-18, August.
    16. Yi Gao & Zhiguo Li & Kashif Khan, 2019. "A Study on the Relationship between Paradox Cognition, Green Industrial Production, and Corporate Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-18, November.
    17. Ciro Apollonio & Gabriella Balacco & Antonio Novelli & Eufemia Tarantino & Alberto Ferruccio Piccinni, 2016. "Land Use Change Impact on Flooding Areas: The Case Study of Cervaro Basin (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-18, October.
    18. Xufeng Cui & Sheng Yang & Guanghong Zhang & Bin Liang & Fei Li, 2020. "An Exploration of a Synthetic Construction Land Use Quality Evaluation Based on Economic-Social-Ecological Coupling Perspective: A Case Study in Major Chinese Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-16, May.
    19. Li, Lei & Ma, Shaojun & Zheng, Yilin & Xiao, Xinyue, 2022. "Integrated regional development: Comparison of urban agglomeration policies in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    20. Ying Gong & Xiao-Qiong Yang & Chun-Yan Ran & Victor Shi & Yu-Feng Zhou, 2021. "Evaluation of the Sustainable Coupling Coordination of the Logistics Industry and the Manufacturing Industry in the Yangtze River Economic Belt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:15:p:4209-:d:254642. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.