IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i10p2793-d231576.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interactions Among Factors Influencing Product Innovation and Innovation Behaviour: Market Orientation, Managerial Ties, and Government Support

Author

Listed:
  • Natenapang Thongsri

    (Department of Tropical Agriculture and International Cooperation, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung 9120, Taiwan)

  • Alex Kung-Hsiung Chang

    (Department of Business Administration, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung 91201, Taiwan)

Abstract

Ongoing globalization and changing customer needs make it increasingly difficult for firms to survive in the long term. Innovation is considered an important tool for firms in this environment. In particular, a firm’s ability to cultivate innovative behaviour and implement product innovation for sustainability is important. This study explores resources and capabilities to enhance firm innovation behaviour and implementation of sustainable product innovation. The results provide insights on how firms can manage strategies for future sustainable innovations. We used a sample of 645 small- and medium-sized enterprises and presented the conceptual framework according to a resource-based view and relational capital. We specified three independent factors that enhance sustainable innovation and superior performance: market orientation, managerial ties, and government support. We used a questionnaire survey and structural equation modelling to evaluate the conceptual model. We found that interactions between business ties, customers, and competitor orientation can enhance sustainable product innovation, whereas interactions between government support and political relations can enhance the sustainability of innovation behaviour. Moreover, product innovation and innovation behaviour are mediators that can lead to superior firm performance. The results suggest ways entrepreneurs and public policy makers can promote sustainable innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Natenapang Thongsri & Alex Kung-Hsiung Chang, 2019. "Interactions Among Factors Influencing Product Innovation and Innovation Behaviour: Market Orientation, Managerial Ties, and Government Support," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:10:p:2793-:d:231576
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/10/2793/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/10/2793/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Justin J. P. Jansen & Frans A. J. Van Den Bosch & Henk W. Volberda, 2006. "Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(11), pages 1661-1674, November.
    2. Wang, Cheng Lu & Chung, Henry F.L., 2013. "The moderating role of managerial ties in market orientation and innovation: An Asian perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2431-2437.
    3. Kevin Zheng Zhou & Julie Juan Li & Nan Zhou & Chenting Su, 2008. "Market orientation, job satisfaction, product quality, and firm performance: evidence from China," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(9), pages 985-1000, September.
    4. Gamble, Jordan Robert & Brennan, Michael & McAdam, Rodney, 2017. "A rewarding experience? Exploring how crowdfunding is affecting music industry business models," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 25-36.
    5. Alshahry Abdullah saeed A & Wang Aimin, 2015. "Market orientation and innovation: A review of literature," International Journal of Innovation and Economic Development, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 1(1), pages 18-26, April.
    6. Peihua Fan & Qiaozhuan Liang & Heng Liu & Mingjun Hou, 2013. "The moderating role of context in managerial ties--firm performance link: a meta-analytic review of mainly Chinese-based studies," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 461-489, October.
    7. repec:mgs:ijoied:v:1:y:2015:i:1:p:17-26 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Zhao, Weilin & Watanabe, Chihiro & Griffy-Brown, Charla, 2009. "Competitive advantage in an industry cluster: The case of Dalian Software Park in China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 139-149.
    9. Li, Julie Juan & Zhou, Kevin Zheng, 2010. "How foreign firms achieve competitive advantage in the Chinese emerging economy: Managerial ties and market orientation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(8), pages 856-862, August.
    10. Rezart Prifti & Genc Alimehmeti, 2017. "Market orientation, innovation, and firm performance—an analysis of Albanian firms," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-19, December.
    11. Nile W. Hatch & Jeffrey H. Dyer, 2004. "Human capital and learning as a source of sustainable competitive advantage," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(12), pages 1155-1178, December.
    12. Wang, Jue, 2018. "Innovation and government intervention: A comparison of Singapore and Hong Kong," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 399-412.
    13. Cardoza, Guillermo & Fornes, Gaston & Farber, Vanina & Gonzalez Duarte, Roberto & Ruiz Gutierrez, Jaime, 2016. "Barriers and public policies affecting the international expansion of Latin American SMEs: Evidence from Brazil, Colombia, and Peru," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 2030-2039.
    14. Jean, Ruey Jer “Bryan” & Kim, Daekwan & Bello, Daniel C., 2017. "Relationship-based product innovations: Evidence from the global supply chain," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 127-140.
    15. Najafi-Tavani, Saeed & Sharifi, Hossein & Najafi-Tavani, Zhaleh, 2016. "Market orientation, marketing capability, and new product performance: The moderating role of absorptive capacity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5059-5064.
    16. David B. Audretsch & Oliver Falck & Stephan Heblich & Adam Lederer (ed.), 2011. "Handbook of Research on Innovation and Entrepreneurship," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13275.
    17. Kull, Alexander J. & Mena, Jeannette A. & Korschun, Daniel, 2016. "A resource-based view of stakeholder marketing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5553-5560.
    18. Annabeth Aagaard, 2018. "Managing Sustainable Innovation," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Reinhard Altenburger (ed.), Innovation Management and Corporate Social Responsibility, pages 13-28, Springer.
    19. Doblinger, Claudia & Surana, Kavita & Anadon, Laura Diaz, 2019. "Governments as partners: The role of alliances in U.S. cleantech startup innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(6), pages 1458-1475.
    20. Cacciolatti, Luca & Lee, Soo Hee, 2016. "Revisiting the relationship between marketing capabilities and firm performance: The moderating role of market orientation, marketing strategy and organisational power," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5597-5610.
    21. G. Tomas M. Hult & David J. Ketchen & Stanley F. Slater, 2005. "Market orientation and performance: an integration of disparate approaches," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(12), pages 1173-1181, December.
    22. De Maeseneire, Wouter & Claeys, Tine, 2012. "SMEs, foreign direct investment and financial constraints: The case of Belgium," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 408-424.
    23. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    24. Gülşen Akman & Cengiz Yilmaz, 2008. "Innovative Capability, Innovation Strategy And Market Orientation: An Empirical Analysis In Turkish Software Industry," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 12(01), pages 69-111.
    25. Matthews, Judy & Shulman, Arthur D., 2005. "Competitive advantage in public-sector organizations: explaining the public good/sustainable competitive advantage paradox," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 232-240, February.
    26. David J. Ketchen & G. Tomas M. Hult & Stanley F. Slater, 2007. "Toward greater understanding of market orientation and the resource‐based view," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(9), pages 961-964, September.
    27. Fahy, John, 2002. "A resource-based analysis of sustainable competitive advantage in a global environment," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 57-77, February.
    28. Rajan Varadarajan, 2017. "Innovating for sustainability: a framework for sustainable innovations and a model of sustainable innovations orientation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 14-36, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qiuzhen Ren & Yingjie Xu & Ranran Zhou & Jingdong Liu, 2020. "Can CEO’s Humble Leadership Behavior Really Improve Enterprise Performance and Sustainability? A Case Study of Chinese Start-Up Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-25, April.
    2. Wendy Anzules-Falcones & Sylvia Novillo-Villegas, 2023. "Innovation Capacity, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Flexibility: An Analysis from Industrial SMEs in Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-24, June.
    3. Jianhong He & Hongmin Chen & Fu-Sheng Tsai, 2020. "Strategy Orientation, Innovation Capacity Endowment, and International R&D Intensity of Listed Companies in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Anja Gaudig & Bernd Ebersberger & Andreas Kuckertz, 2021. "Sustainability-Oriented Macro Trends and Innovation Types—Exploring Different Organization Types Tackling the Global Sustainability Megatrend," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    5. Jugend, Daniel & Fiorini, Paula De Camargo & Armellini, Fabiano & Ferrari, Aline Gabriela, 2020. "Public support for innovation: A systematic review of the literature and implications for open innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    6. Rasha A. A. ElNaggar & Mayar Farrag ElSayed, 2023. "Drivers of business model innovation in micro and small enterprises: evidence from Egypt as an emerging economy," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Sunyoung Park, 2019. "Identification of Overall Innovation Behavior by Using a Decision Tree: The Case of a Korean Manufacturer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-54, November.
    8. Erstu Tarko Kassa & Tilahun Getnet Mirete, 2022. "Exploring factors that determine the innovation of micro and small enterprises: the role of entrepreneurial attitude towards innovation in Woldia, Ethiopia," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bai, Xuan & Wang, Qingtao & Sheng, Shibin & Li, Julie Juan, 2021. "Cross-level interpersonal ties and IJV innovation: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 618-630.
    2. Adomako, Samuel & Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph & Donbesuur, Francis & Ahsan, Mujtaba & Danso, Albert & Uddin, Moshfique, 2022. "Strategic agility of SMEs in emerging economies: Antecedents, consequences and boundary conditions," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(6).
    3. Sun, Wenbin & Price, Joseph & Ding, Yuan, 2019. "The longitudinal effects of internationalization on firm performance: The moderating role of marketing capability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 326-337.
    4. Li Peng & Yuan Li & Marc Essen & Mike W. Peng, 2020. "Institutions, resources, and strategic orientations: A meta-analysis," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 499-529, June.
    5. Bhattarai, Charan Raj & Kwong, Caleb C.Y. & Tasavori, Misagh, 2019. "Market orientation, market disruptiveness capability and social enterprise performance: An empirical study from the United Kingdom," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 47-60.
    6. One-Ki (Daniel) Lee & Vallabh Sambamurthy & Kai H. Lim & Kwok Kee Wei, 2015. "How Does IT Ambidexterity Impact Organizational Agility?," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 398-417, June.
    7. Zhang, Man & Merchant, Hemant, 2020. "A causal analysis of the role of institutions and organizational proficiencies on the innovation capability of Chinese SMEs," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(2).
    8. Sanna Joensuu-Salo & Kirsti Sorama & Anmari Viljamaa & Elina Varamäki, 2018. "Firm Performance among Internationalized SMEs: The Interplay of Market Orientation, Marketing Capability and Digitalization," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-13, July.
    9. Yueping Du & Huanhuan Wang, 2022. "Green Innovation Sustainability: How Green Market Orientation and Absorptive Capacity Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, July.
    10. Asseraf, Yoel & Gnizy, Itzhak, 2022. "Translating strategy into action: The importance of an agile mindset and agile slack in international business," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(6).
    11. Jorge Ferreira & Sofia Cardim & Arnaldo Coelho, 2021. "Dynamic Capabilities and Mediating Effects of Innovation on the Competitive Advantage and Firm’s Performance: the Moderating Role of Organizational Learning Capability," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(2), pages 620-644, June.
    12. Smirnova, Maria M. & Rebiazina, Vera A. & Frösén, Johanna, 2018. "Customer orientation as a multidimensional construct: Evidence from the Russian markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 457-467.
    13. Lu, Feifei & Zhu, Zhu & Zhu, Lina & Gao, Hao, 2022. "Political tie hot potato: The contingent effect of China's anti-corruption policy on cash and innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(4).
    14. Ebrahim Muhamed Endris & Zhou Xiaoyan, 2021. "Managerial Ties and MNCs’ Performance in Ethiopia: The Moderating Effect of Institutional support," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 5(7), pages 215-232.
    15. Rafal Matwiejczuk & Agnieszka Tluczak & Liliana Hawrysz, 2020. "Dynamic Capabilities Revisited: Lessons from Logistics," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 979-996.
    16. Ferreira, Jorge & Coelho, Arnaldo & Moutinho, Luiz, 2020. "Dynamic capabilities, creativity and innovation capability and their impact on competitive advantage and firm performance: The moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 92.
    17. Atzmon, Morane Batya & Vanderstraeten, Johanna & Albers, Sascha, 2022. "Small-firm growth-enabling capabilities: A framework for young technology-based firms," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    18. Antonia Mohedano-Suanes & María-Ángeles Revilla-Camacho & Dolores Garzón, 2021. "Innovation orientation and long-term performance: The mediating role of market perception capability," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 741-757, June.
    19. Bodlaj, Mateja & Čater, Barbara, 2022. "Responsive and proactive market orientation in relation to SMEs’ export venture performance: The mediating role of marketing capabilities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 256-265.
    20. Tania Bucic & Liem Viet Ngo & Ashish Sinha, 2017. "Improving the effectiveness of market-oriented organisation: Empirical evidence from an emerging economy," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 42(2), pages 308-327, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:10:p:2793-:d:231576. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.