IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i1p156-d126309.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationship between Convenience, Perceived Value, and Repurchase Intention in Online Shopping in Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Quoc Trung Pham

    (School of Industrial Management, HCMC University of Technology, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam)

  • Xuan Phuc Tran

    (School of Industrial Management, HCMC University of Technology, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam)

  • Sanjay Misra

    (Department of Electrical and Information Engineering, Covenant University, Ota 1023, Nigeria
    Department of Computer Engineering, Atilim University, Incek, Ankara 06836, Turkey)

  • Rytis Maskeliūnas

    (Department of Multimedia Engineering, Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas 51368, Lithuania)

  • Robertas Damaševičius

    (Department of Software Engineering, Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas 51368, Lithuania)

Abstract

Electronic commerce (e-commerce) is an increasingly popular trend in modern economy concomitant with the development of the Internet. E-commerce has developed considerably, making Vietnam one of the fastest growing markets in the world. However, its growth rate has not matched its potential, leading to the question how online retailers could improve their practices and thus contribute to the sustainable development of emerging markets such as Vietnam. Therefore, with the goal of providing online retailers with many methods to improve their online shopping service, this study examined the direct and indirect influence of the dimensions of online shopping convenience on repurchase intention through customer-perceived value. A survey of 230 Vietnamese customers was conducted to test the theoretical model. A structural equation model was used for data analysis. The results determined that the five dimensions of online shopping convenience are: access, search, evaluation, transaction, and possession/post-purchase convenience. All dimensions have a direct impact on perceived value and repurchase intention. The results also show the important role of perceived value when a factor both directly influences repurchase intention and mediates the relationship between convenience and repurchase intention.

Suggested Citation

  • Quoc Trung Pham & Xuan Phuc Tran & Sanjay Misra & Rytis Maskeliūnas & Robertas Damaševičius, 2018. "Relationship between Convenience, Perceived Value, and Repurchase Intention in Online Shopping in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:1:p:156-:d:126309
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/1/156/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/1/156/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Se-Yeon Ahn & So-Hyung Kim, 2017. "What Makes Firms Innovative? The Role of Social Capital in Corporate Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-13, September.
    2. Qingyi Chen & Ning Zhang, 2015. "Does E-Commerce Provide a Sustained Competitive Advantage? An Investigation of Survival and Sustainability in Growth-Oriented Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Yu Wang (Avery. W) & Yi Wang & Soo Hee Lee, 2017. "The Effect of Cross-Border E-Commerce on China’s International Trade: An Empirical Study Based on Transaction Cost Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-13, November.
    4. Grażyna Śmigielska & Renata Oczkowska, 2017. "Retailers’ Responsibility towards Consumers and Key Drivers of Their Development in Poland," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Kim, Youn-Kyung & Lee, Min-Young & Park, Soo-Hee, 2014. "Shopping value orientation: Conceptualization and measurement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 2884-2890.
    6. Mercy Mpinganjira, 2015. "Online Store Service Convenience, Customer Satisfaction and Behavioural Intentions: A Focus on Utilitarian Oriented Shoppers," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 7(1), pages 36-49.
    7. Han-Shen Chen & Bi-Kun Tsai & Chi-Ming Hsieh, 2017. "Determinants of Consumers’ Purchasing Intentions for the Hydrogen-Electric Motorcycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-12, August.
    8. Chuanpeng Yu & Zhengang Zhang & Chunpei Lin & Yenchun Jim Wu, 2017. "Knowledge Creation Process and Sustainable Competitive Advantage: the Role of Technological Innovation Capabilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-16, December.
    9. Sanjit Kumar Roy & Walfried M. Lassar & Vaibhav Shekhar, 2016. "Convenience and satisfaction: mediation of fairness and quality," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(5-6), pages 239-260, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Duarte, Paulo & Costa e Silva, Susana & Ferreira, Margarida Bernardo, 2018. "How convenient is it? Delivering online shopping convenience to enhance customer satisfaction and encourage e-WOM," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 161-169.
    2. Sandipan S. Sen & Aliosha Alexandrov & Subhash Jha & William C. McDowell & Emin Babakus, 2023. "Convenient = competitive? How Brick-And-Mortar Retailers can cope with Online Competition," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 1615-1643, July.
    3. Patricia Ordóñez de Pablos & Miltiadis Lytras, 2018. "Knowledge Management, Innovation and Big Data: Implications for Sustainability, Policy Making and Competitiveness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-7, June.
    4. Judit Oláh & Nicodemus Kitukutha & Hossam Haddad & Miklós Pakurár & Domicián Máté & József Popp, 2018. "Achieving Sustainable E-Commerce in Environmental, Social and Economic Dimensions by Taking Possible Trade-Offs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Munshi, M.Faris Uddin & Hussain, Hammad & Ahmed, Muneeb & Idress, Amir, 2020. "Measuring overall convenience of consumers on online shopping and their behavioral intention," MPRA Paper 104588, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Ana Belen Tulcanaza-Prieto & Alexandra Cortez-Ordoñez & Chang Won Lee, 2023. "Influence of Customer Perception Factors on AI-Enabled Customer Experience in the Ecuadorian Banking Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-22, August.
    7. Chang, Hsiu-Hua & Guo, Yi-Yan, 2021. "Online fraudulent returns in Taiwan: The impacts of e-retailers’ transaction ethics and consumer personality," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    8. Teimuraz Gogokhia & George Berulava, 2021. "Business environment reforms, innovation and firm productivity in transition economies," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(2), pages 221-245, June.
    9. Yoonkyo Cho & Taehwan Kim & Jaewhak Roh, 2021. "An analysis of the effects of electronic commerce on the Korean economy using the CGE model," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 831-854, September.
    10. F. Isorna Llerena & E. López González & J. J. Caparrós Mancera & F. Segura Manzano & J. M. Andújar, 2021. "Hydrogen vs. Battery-Based Propulsion Systems in Unipersonal Vehicles—Developing Solutions to Improve the Sustainability of Urban Mobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-16, May.
    11. Jeandri Robertson, 2020. "Competition in Knowledge Ecosystems: A Theory Elaboration Approach Using a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    12. Xin Lin & RunZe Wu & Yong-Taek Lim & Jieping Han & Shih-Chih Chen, 2019. "Understanding the Sustainable Usage Intention of Mobile Payment Technology in Korea: Cross-Countries Comparison of Chinese and Korean Users," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-23, October.
    13. Chikabwi, Douglas & Chikiwa, Rudo, 2021. "Would Customs Trade Facilitation Programs stimulate COMESA intra-export flows?," African Journal of Economic Review, African Journal of Economic Review, vol. 9(2), April.
    14. Marija Mosurović Ružičić & Mirjana Miletić & Marina Dobrota, 2021. "Does a National Innovation System Encourage Sustainability? Lessons from the Construction Industry in Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, March.
    15. Ge, Shuang & Liu, Xielin, 2022. "The role of knowledge creation, absorption and acquisition in determining national competitive advantage," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    16. Derya Çelik & Ülkü Uzunçarşılı, 2023. "Is the Effect of Organizational Ambidexterity and Technological Innovation Capability on Firm Performance Mediated by Competitive Advantage? An Empirical Research on Turkish Manufacturing and Service ," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    17. Liang Xiao & Feipeng Guo & Fumao Yu & Shengnan Liu, 2019. "The Effects of Online Shopping Context Cues on Consumers’ Purchase Intention for Cross-Border E-Commerce Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, May.
    18. Adamu Jibir & Musa Abdu, 2021. "Human Capital and Propensity to Protect Intellectual Properties as Innovation Output: the Case of Nigerian Manufacturing and Service Firms," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(2), pages 595-619, June.
    19. Jian Mou & Gang Ren & Chunxiu Qin & Kerry Kurcz, 2019. "Understanding the topics of export cross-border e-commerce consumers feedback: an LDA approach," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 749-777, December.
    20. Miftahurrohman Miftahurrohman & Eko Sediyono & Albert Kriestian Novi Adhi Nugraha, 2022. "The Model of the Sustainability of E-commerce Adoption: A Study on Carved Furniture SMEs in Indonesia," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 30(1), pages 466-483, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:1:p:156-:d:126309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.