IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i12p4679-d189087.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and Application of an Assessment Complement for Production System Audits Based on Data Quality, IT Infrastructure, and Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Aitor Goti

    (Faculty of Engineering, University of Deusto, 48014 Bilbao, Biscay, Spain)

  • Alberto De la Calle

    (Faculty of Engineering, University of Deusto, 48014 Bilbao, Biscay, Spain)

  • María José Gil

    (Faculty of Engineering, University of Deusto, 48014 Bilbao, Biscay, Spain)

  • Ander Errasti

    (Natra Chocolate Internacional, 20560 Oñati, Guipuzcoa, Spain)

  • Pedro R. D. Bom

    (Deusto Business School, University of Deusto, 48014 Bilbao, Biscay, Spain)

  • Pablo García-Bringas

    (Faculty of Engineering, University of Deusto, 48014 Bilbao, Biscay, Spain)

Abstract

Some companies improve their production performance using manufacturing or operations models. In the last decade these models have come to be known as “X” production systems (XPS), or company-specific production systems. XPS systems have been oriented mainly to implement lean manufacturing and continuous improvement principles, but have shown little progress in terms of sustainability principles. The emergence of databases (DBs), big data, and business intelligence (BI) systems have enabled the creation of system panels to measure performance and manage business processes. These panels also allow assessment of the implementation of the principles, methods, and tools of the XPS. The effectiveness of these systems requires sufficient IT infrastructure and an acceptable quality of data, but the key performance indicator (KPI) panels of XPSs often lack consistent and acceptable data. In other cases, the IT infrastructure does not cover the needs of the personnel managing the operations, which limits the progress of XPSs. This paper documents the positive experience of one company in jointly auditing and improving data quality and IT infrastructure, which better aligned its XPS with sustainability objectives. It explores, using an empirical case study where the researchers were actively involved, the possibility of complementing the KPI panel system of XPS assessment systems with the principles of sustainability, data quality, and IT infrastructure. The paper describes the development and testing of an assessment tool based on those principles, and offers a number of results that may benefit similar small- and medium-sized companies (SMEs).

Suggested Citation

  • Aitor Goti & Alberto De la Calle & María José Gil & Ander Errasti & Pedro R. D. Bom & Pablo García-Bringas, 2018. "Development and Application of an Assessment Complement for Production System Audits Based on Data Quality, IT Infrastructure, and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:4679-:d:189087
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/12/4679/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/12/4679/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roland W. Scholz, 2016. "Sustainable Digital Environments: What Major Challenges Is Humankind Facing?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-31, July.
    2. Mihaela Muntean, 2018. "Business Intelligence Issues for Sustainability Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-10, January.
    3. Barbara Brenner, 2018. "Transformative Sustainable Business Models in the Light of the Digital Imperative—A Global Business Economics Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-25, November.
    4. Torbjørn Netland & Kasra Ferdows & Ebly Sanchez, 2015. "How Company-Specific Production Systems Affect Plant Performance: The S-Curve Theory," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(3), pages 362-364, March.
    5. Cagatay Tasdemir & Rado Gazo, 2018. "A Systematic Literature Review for Better Understanding of Lean Driven Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-54, July.
    6. Roland W. Scholz, 2017. "Digital Threat and Vulnerability Management: The SVIDT Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-26, April.
    7. Wen-Hsien Tsai & Shang-Yu Lai, 2018. "Green Production Planning and Control Model with ABC under Industry 4.0 for the Paper Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-29, August.
    8. Umit Can & Bilal Alatas, 2017. "Big Social Network Data and Sustainable Economic Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-19, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Naia Augusto Barud & Renata Araujo Oliveira & Carlos Francisco Simões Gomes & Adriana Manzolillo Sanseverino & Mara Regina Santos Barcelos & Marcos Santos, 2021. "Lean in information technology departments or companies: identifying publications on the Scopus and Web of Science databases," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(3), pages 2437-2457, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patricia Ordóñez de Pablos & Miltiadis Lytras, 2018. "Knowledge Management, Innovation and Big Data: Implications for Sustainability, Policy Making and Competitiveness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-7, June.
    2. Francisco Javier Forcadell & Elisa Aracil & Fernando Ubeda, 2020. "Using reputation for corporate sustainability to tackle banks digitalization challenges," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2181-2193, September.
    3. Barbara Brenner, 2018. "Transformative Sustainable Business Models in the Light of the Digital Imperative—A Global Business Economics Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-25, November.
    4. Liliya Satalkina & Gerald Steiner, 2020. "Digital Entrepreneurship and its Role in Innovation Systems: A Systematic Literature Review as a Basis for Future Research Avenues for Sustainable Transitions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-27, April.
    5. Roland W. Scholz & Eric J. Bartelsman & Sarah Diefenbach & Lude Franke & Arnim Grunwald & Dirk Helbing & Richard Hill & Lorenz Hilty & Mattias Höjer & Stefan Klauser & Christian Montag & Peter Parycek, 2018. "Unintended Side Effects of the Digital Transition: European Scientists’ Messages from a Proposition-Based Expert Round Table," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-48, June.
    6. Axel Jacob & Frank Teuteberg, 2020. "Towards a Taxonomy for Design Options of Social Networking Technologies in Sustainable Business Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Ulrich Schmitt, 2018. "Rationalizing a Personalized Conceptualization for the Digital Transition and Sustainability of Knowledge Management Using the SVIDT Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-26, March.
    8. Mai Mostafa Awad & Abd‘Elazez Hashem & Hend Mohamed Naguib, 2022. "The Impact of Lean Management Practices on Economic Sustainability in Services Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-27, July.
    9. Lazar Gitelman & Mikhail Kozhevnikov & Olga Ryzhuk, 2019. "Advance Management Education for Power-Engineering and Industry of the Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-23, October.
    10. Vasile-Daniel Păvăloaia & Elena-Mădălina Teodor & Doina Fotache & Magdalena Danileţ, 2019. "Opinion Mining on Social Media Data: Sentiment Analysis of User Preferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-21, August.
    11. Mihaela Muntean & Laurenţiu Dijmărescu, 2018. "Sustainable Implementation of Access Control," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-9, May.
    12. Kleber F. Barcia & Lizzi Garcia-Castro & Jorge Abad-Moran, 2022. "Lean Six Sigma Impact Analysis on Sustainability Using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM): A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-26, March.
    13. Broccardo, Laura & Zicari, Adrián & Jabeen, Fauzia & Bhatti, Zeeshan A., 2023. "How digitalization supports a sustainable business model: A literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    14. Yáñez-Valdés, Claudia & Guerrero, Maribel & Barros-Celume, Sebastián & Ibáñez, María J., 2023. "Winds of change due to global lockdowns: Refreshing digital social entrepreneurship research paradigm," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    15. Scholz, Roland W. & Czichos, Reiner & Parycek, Peter & Lampoltshammer, Thomas J., 2020. "Organizational vulnerability of digital threats: A first validation of an assessment method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 627-643.
    16. Held, Martin, 2022. "Spatial transformation: An introduction to the Great Transformation towards sustainability," Forschungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Spatial transformation: Processes, strategies, research design, volume 19, pages 27-49, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    17. Young-Gyun Ahn & Taeil Kim & Bo-Ram Kim & Min-Kyu Lee, 2022. "A Study on the Development Priority of Smart Shipping Items—Focusing on the Expert Survey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, June.
    18. Ciampi, Francesco & Faraoni, Monica & Ballerini, Jacopo & Meli, Francesco, 2022. "The co-evolutionary relationship between digitalization and organizational agility: Ongoing debates, theoretical developments and future research perspectives," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    19. Maria Giuffrida & Riccardo Mangiaracina, 2020. "Green Practices for Global Supply Chains in Diverse Industrial, Geographical, and Technological Settings: A Literature Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, December.
    20. Ulrich Schmitt, 2021. "Projectability and Heritage Management of Design Knowledge: A Grass-Roots Artefact Perspective of a Longitudinal Research Project for Knowledge Management System Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:4679-:d:189087. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.