IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jstats/v6y2022i1p4-66d1017369.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Deep Reinforcement Learning Agents Model Intentions?

Author

Listed:
  • Tambet Matiisen

    (Institute of Computer Science, University of Tartu, Narva mnt 18, 51009 Tartu, Estonia)

  • Aqeel Labash

    (Institute of Computer Science, University of Tartu, Narva mnt 18, 51009 Tartu, Estonia)

  • Daniel Majoral

    (Institute of Computer Science, University of Tartu, Narva mnt 18, 51009 Tartu, Estonia)

  • Jaan Aru

    (Institute of Computer Science, University of Tartu, Narva mnt 18, 51009 Tartu, Estonia)

  • Raul Vicente

    (Institute of Computer Science, University of Tartu, Narva mnt 18, 51009 Tartu, Estonia)

Abstract

Inferring other agents’ mental states, such as their knowledge, beliefs and intentions, is thought to be essential for effective interactions with other agents. Recently, multi-agent systems trained via deep reinforcement learning have been shown to succeed in solving various tasks. Still, how each agent models or represents other agents in their environment remains unclear. In this work, we test whether deep reinforcement learning agents trained with the multi-agent deep deterministic policy gradient (MADDPG) algorithm explicitly represent other agents’ intentions (their specific aims or plans) during a task in which the agents have to coordinate the covering of different spots in a 2D environment. In particular, we tracked over time the performance of a linear decoder trained to predict the final targets of all agents from the hidden-layer activations of each agent’s neural network controller. We observed that the hidden layers of agents represented explicit information about other agents’ intentions, i.e., the target landmark the other agent ended up covering. We also performed a series of experiments in which some agents were replaced by others with fixed targets to test the levels of generalization of the trained agents. We noticed that during the training phase, the agents developed a preference for each landmark, which hindered generalization. To alleviate the above problem, we evaluated simple changes to the MADDPG training algorithm which lead to better generalization against unseen agents. Our method for confirming intention modeling in deep learning agents is simple to implement and can be used to improve the generalization of multi-agent systems in fields such as robotics, autonomous vehicles and smart cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Tambet Matiisen & Aqeel Labash & Daniel Majoral & Jaan Aru & Raul Vicente, 2022. "Do Deep Reinforcement Learning Agents Model Intentions?," Stats, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-17, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:6:y:2022:i:1:p:4-66:d:1017369
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/6/1/4/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/6/1/4/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Volodymyr Mnih & Koray Kavukcuoglu & David Silver & Andrei A. Rusu & Joel Veness & Marc G. Bellemare & Alex Graves & Martin Riedmiller & Andreas K. Fidjeland & Georg Ostrovski & Stig Petersen & Charle, 2015. "Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning," Nature, Nature, vol. 518(7540), pages 529-533, February.
    2. David Silver & Aja Huang & Chris J. Maddison & Arthur Guez & Laurent Sifre & George van den Driessche & Julian Schrittwieser & Ioannis Antonoglou & Veda Panneershelvam & Marc Lanctot & Sander Dieleman, 2016. "Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search," Nature, Nature, vol. 529(7587), pages 484-489, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yassine Chemingui & Adel Gastli & Omar Ellabban, 2020. "Reinforcement Learning-Based School Energy Management System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-21, December.
    2. Yuhong Wang & Lei Chen & Hong Zhou & Xu Zhou & Zongsheng Zheng & Qi Zeng & Li Jiang & Liang Lu, 2021. "Flexible Transmission Network Expansion Planning Based on DQN Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, April.
    3. Huang, Ruchen & He, Hongwen & Gao, Miaojue, 2023. "Training-efficient and cost-optimal energy management for fuel cell hybrid electric bus based on a novel distributed deep reinforcement learning framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 346(C).
    4. Neha Soni & Enakshi Khular Sharma & Narotam Singh & Amita Kapoor, 2019. "Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Businesses: from Research, Innovation, Market Deployment to Future Shifts in Business Models," Papers 1905.02092, arXiv.org.
    5. Omar Al-Ani & Sanjoy Das, 2022. "Reinforcement Learning: Theory and Applications in HEMS," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-37, September.
    6. Taejong Joo & Hyunyoung Jun & Dongmin Shin, 2022. "Task Allocation in Human–Machine Manufacturing Systems Using Deep Reinforcement Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Mahmoud Mahfouz & Tucker Balch & Manuela Veloso & Danilo Mandic, 2021. "Learning to Classify and Imitate Trading Agents in Continuous Double Auction Markets," Papers 2110.01325, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2021.
    8. Oleh Lukianykhin & Tetiana Bogodorova, 2021. "Voltage Control-Based Ancillary Service Using Deep Reinforcement Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-22, April.
    9. Wu, Yuankai & Tan, Huachun & Peng, Jiankun & Zhang, Hailong & He, Hongwen, 2019. "Deep reinforcement learning of energy management with continuous control strategy and traffic information for a series-parallel plug-in hybrid electric bus," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 454-466.
    10. Chen, Jiaxin & Shu, Hong & Tang, Xiaolin & Liu, Teng & Wang, Weida, 2022. "Deep reinforcement learning-based multi-objective control of hybrid power system combined with road recognition under time-varying environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PC).
    11. Amirhosein Mosavi & Yaser Faghan & Pedram Ghamisi & Puhong Duan & Sina Faizollahzadeh Ardabili & Ely Salwana & Shahab S. Band, 2020. "Comprehensive Review of Deep Reinforcement Learning Methods and Applications in Economics," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-42, September.
    12. Zhang, Yihao & Chai, Zhaojie & Lykotrafitis, George, 2021. "Deep reinforcement learning with a particle dynamics environment applied to emergency evacuation of a room with obstacles," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 571(C).
    13. Alessio Brini & Daniele Tantari, 2021. "Deep Reinforcement Trading with Predictable Returns," Papers 2104.14683, arXiv.org, revised May 2023.
    14. Georgios D. Kontes & Georgios I. Giannakis & Víctor Sánchez & Pablo De Agustin-Camacho & Ander Romero-Amorrortu & Natalia Panagiotidou & Dimitrios V. Rovas & Simone Steiger & Christopher Mutschler & G, 2018. "Simulation-Based Evaluation and Optimization of Control Strategies in Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-23, December.
    15. Weifan Long & Taixian Hou & Xiaoyi Wei & Shichao Yan & Peng Zhai & Lihua Zhang, 2023. "A Survey on Population-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, May.
    16. Chanjuan Liu & Jinmiao Cong & Tianhao Zhao & Enqiang Zhu, 2023. "Improving Agent Decision Payoffs via a New Framework of Opponent Modeling," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-15, July.
    17. Yifeng Guo & Xingyu Fu & Yuyan Shi & Mingwen Liu, 2018. "Robust Log-Optimal Strategy with Reinforcement Learning," Papers 1805.00205, arXiv.org.
    18. Guan, Xiaoshu & Xiang, Zhengliang & Bao, Yuequan & Li, Hui, 2022. "Structural dominant failure modes searching method based on deep reinforcement learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    19. Shuo Sun & Rundong Wang & Bo An, 2021. "Reinforcement Learning for Quantitative Trading," Papers 2109.13851, arXiv.org.
    20. Yuchao Dong, 2022. "Randomized Optimal Stopping Problem in Continuous time and Reinforcement Learning Algorithm," Papers 2208.02409, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2023.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:6:y:2022:i:1:p:4-66:d:1017369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.