IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v11y2021i4p129-d666671.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Esports Substitute Traditional Sports? The Convergence of Sports and Video Gaming during the Pandemic and Beyond

Author

Listed:
  • Haozhou Pu

    (Department of Health and Sport Science, University of Dayton, Dayton, OH 45469, USA)

  • Jeeyoon Kim

    (Department of Sport Management, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA)

  • Corinne Daprano

    (Department of Health and Sport Science, University of Dayton, Dayton, OH 45469, USA)

Abstract

This research examines the various ways that video games, particularly esports, have been leveraged for content production and fan engagement (i.e., gamification) in traditional sports during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as sports fans’ reactions in relation to their motives, points of attachment, and other consumer behavior. The study presents a sports–gaming convergence framework and identifies six popular gamification modes where video games and traditional sports converge during the pandemic. The survey results further reveal that gamification content is not consumed as simply a “substitute” for traditional sports, but instead a complementary yet unique product. In conclusion, we suggest that it is critical to recognize the differences between fans of video games and fans of traditional sports concerning market segmentation. Nevertheless, esports could effectively bridge these two industries and their consumers by enriching the content offering and extending distribution channels.

Suggested Citation

  • Haozhou Pu & Jeeyoon Kim & Corinne Daprano, 2021. "Can Esports Substitute Traditional Sports? The Convergence of Sports and Video Gaming during the Pandemic and Beyond," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:129-:d:666671
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/11/4/129/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/11/4/129/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bob Heere, 2018. "Embracing the sportification of society: Defining e-sports through a polymorphic view on sport," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 21-24, January.
    2. Heere, Bob, 2018. "Embracing the sportification of society: Defining e-sports through a polymorphic view on sport," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 21-24.
    3. Harry H. Kwon & Galen T. Trail & Dean S. Anderson, 2005. "Are Multiple Points of Attachment Necessary to Predict Cognitive, Affective, Conative, or Behavioral Loyalty?," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 255-270, September.
    4. Cunningham, George B. & Kwon, Hyungil, 2003. "The Theory of Planned Behaviour and Intentions to Attend a Sport Event," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 127-145, November.
    5. Kirstin Hallmann & Thomas Giel, 2018. "eSports – Competitive sports or recreational activity?," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 14-20, January.
    6. Rajagopal, 2014. "The Human Factors," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Architecting Enterprise, chapter 9, pages 225-249, Palgrave Macmillan.
    7. George B. Cunningham & Hyungil Kwon, 2003. "The Theory of Planned Behaviour and Intentions to Attend a Sport Event," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(2), pages 127-145, July.
    8. Tu, Rungting & Hsieh, Peishan & Feng, Wenting, 2019. "Walking for fun or for “likes”? The impacts of different gamification orientations of fitness apps on consumers’ physical activities," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 682-693.
    9. Kwon, Harry H. & Trail, Galen T. & Anderson, Dean S., 2005. "Are Multiple Points of Attachment Necessary to Predict Cognitive, Affective, Conative, or Behavioral Loyalty?," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 255-270, November.
    10. Hallmann, Kirstin & Giel, Thomas, 2018. "eSports – Competitive sports or recreational activity?," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 14-20.
    11. Rungting Tu & Peishan Hsieh & Wenting Feng, 2019. "Walking for fun or for “likes”? The impacts of different gamification orientations of fitness apps on consumers’ physical activities," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(5), pages 682-693, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Philip Turbutt, 2015. "Motivation, segmentation and the mega-tournament experience: a study of English Football Tourists at World Cup 2014," Birkbeck Sports Business Centre Working Papers 11, Birkbeck College, Department of Management.
    2. Hergueux, Jerome & Smagghue, Gabriel, 2023. "The dominance of skill in online poker," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    3. Cunningham, George B. & Fairley, Sheranne & Ferkins, Lesley & Kerwin, Shannon & Lock, Daniel & Shaw, Sally & Wicker, Pamela, 2018. "eSport: Construct specifications and implications for sport management," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 1-6.
    4. Ardvin Kester S. Ong & Yogi Tri Prasetyo & Kerr Lorenzo Picazo & Kim Aaron Salvador & Bobby Ardiansyah Miraja & Yoshiki B. Kurata & Thanatorn Chuenyindee & Reny Nadlifatin & Anak Agung Ngurah Perwira , 2021. "Gym-Goers Preference Analysis of Fitness Centers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Conjoint Analysis Approach for Business Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-17, September.
    5. Farman Ullah & Yigang Wu & Khalid Mehmood & Fauzia Jabeen & Yaser Iftikhar & Ángel Acevedo-Duque & Ho Kwong Kwan, 2021. "Impact of Spectators’ Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility on Regional Attachment in Sports: Three-Wave Indirect Effects of Spectators’ Pride and Team Identification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-14, January.
    6. Scarpi, Daniele & Pizzi, Gabriele & Raggiotto, Francesco & Mason, Michela, 2018. "A qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) of satisfaction toward extreme sporting Events," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 358-368.
    7. Weisheng Chiu & Thomas Chun Man Fan & Sang-Back Nam & Ping-Hung Sun, 2021. "Knowledge Mapping and Sustainable Development of eSports Research: A Bibliometric and Visualized Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-17, September.
    8. Moital, Miguel & Bain, Amy & Thomas, Harriet, 2019. "Summary of cognitive, affective, and behavioural outcomes of consuming prestigious sports events," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 652-666.
    9. Lee, Jaedeock & Ferreira, Mauricio, 2013. "A role of team and organizational identification in the success of cause-related sport marketing," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 161-172.
    10. Frano Giakoni-Ramírez & Eugenio Merellano-Navarro & Daniel Duclos-Bastías, 2022. "Professional Esports Players: Motivation and Physical Activity Levels," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-13, February.
    11. Dwyer, Brendan & Mudrick, Michael & Greenhalgh, Gregory P. & LeCrom, Carrie W. & Drayer, Joris, 2015. "The tie that blinds? Developing and validating a scale to measure emotional attachment to a sport team," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 570-582.
    12. Brian P. McCullough & Jonathan C. Casper & Danielle M. Kushner Smith, 2022. "Fan Responses of Sponsored Environmental Sustainability Initiatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, October.
    13. Giachino, Chiara & Nirino, Niccolò & Leonidou, Erasmia & Glyptis, Loukas, 2023. "eSport in the digital era: Exploring the moderating role of perceived usefulness on financial behavioural aspects within reward-crowdfunding," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PB).
    14. Hollebeek, Linda D. & Abbasi, Amir Zaib & Schultz, Carsten D. & Ting, Ding Hooi & Sigurdsson, Valdimar, 2022. "Hedonic consumption experience in videogaming: A multidimensional perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    15. Michael R. Ward & Alexander D. Harmon, 2019. "ESport Superstars," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 20(8), pages 987-1013, December.
    16. Riadh Ladhari & Soumaya Cheikhrouhou & Miguel Morales & Emna Zaaboub, 2022. "Antecedents and consequences of emotional attachment to sport teams brands," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(5), pages 454-469, September.
    17. Fotiadis, Anestis & Williams, Russell Blair, 2017. "“TiCoSa” a 3d matrix conceptual model to investigate visitors’ perceptions in an athletic event," MPRA Paper 90638, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 17 Apr 2017.
    18. Mei-Yuan Jeng & Fan-Yun Pai & Tsu-Ming Yeh, 2017. "The Virtual Reality Leisure Activities Experience on Elderly People," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 12(1), pages 49-65, March.
    19. Jing Li & Chia-Chien Hsu & Ching-Torng Lin, 2019. "Leisure Participation Behavior and Psychological Well-Being of Elderly Adults: An Empirical Study of Tai Chi Chuan in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-19, September.
    20. Bitrián, Paula & Buil, Isabel & Catalán, Sara, 2021. "Enhancing user engagement: The role of gamification in mobile apps," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 170-185.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:129-:d:666671. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.