IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v8y2020i4p135-d458767.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Efficient Are Indian Banks in Managing the Risk-Return Trade-Off? An Empirical Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Jalaludeen Navas

    (Department of Statistics, Ramanujan School of Mathematical Science, Pondicherry University, Puducherry 605014, India)

  • Periyasamy Dhanavanthan

    (Department of Statistics, Ramanujan School of Mathematical Science, Pondicherry University, Puducherry 605014, India)

  • Daniel Lazar

    (Department of Commerce, School of Management Studies, Pondicherry University, Puducherry 605014, India)

Abstract

Risk taking is an inherent element of the banking business. Banks make conscious decisions regarding risk taking as they expect to make more return if they take more risk. The primary objective of this study is to empirically investigate the efficiency of Indian banks in generating return relative to the risk they take. If the efficiency measurement is not adjusted for different risk preferences, then a bank earning lower return at lower risk may be misclassified as less efficient compared to peers earning the same level of return, but operating at a higher level of risk. This paper uses measures of liquidity risk, credit risk, market risk, and insolvency risk to develop a risk-return stochastic frontier in order to examine the risk efficiency of banks, a novel attempt in the Indian context. The paper further analyzes the efficiency of banks with respect to bank specific characteristics and risk management regimes. The models are estimated using data from a sample of 47 major banks for the period 2009–2018. The study reveals that Indian banks, on average, exhibited lower efficiency in trading risk against return during the sample period.

Suggested Citation

  • Jalaludeen Navas & Periyasamy Dhanavanthan & Daniel Lazar, 2020. "How Efficient Are Indian Banks in Managing the Risk-Return Trade-Off? An Empirical Analysis," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:8:y:2020:i:4:p:135-:d:458767
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/8/4/135/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/8/4/135/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Willam Greene, 2005. "Fixed and Random Effects in Stochastic Frontier Models," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 7-32, January.
    2. Kodde, David A & Palm, Franz C, 1986. "Wald Criteria for Jointly Testing Equality and Inequality Restriction s," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 54(5), pages 1243-1248, September.
    3. Berger, Allen N. & Mester, Loretta J., 2003. "Explaining the dramatic changes in performance of US banks: technological change, deregulation, and dynamic changes in competition," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 57-95, January.
    4. Kumbhakar, Subal C & Sarkar, Subrata, 2003. "Deregulation, Ownership, and Productivity Growth in the Banking Industry: Evidence from India," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 35(3), pages 403-424, June.
    5. Hughes, Joseph P. & Mester, Loretta J. & Moon, Choon-Geol, 2001. "Are scale economies in banking elusive or illusive?: Evidence obtained by incorporating capital structure and risk-taking into models of bank production," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 25(12), pages 2169-2208, December.
    6. Hughes, Joseph P. & Mester, Loretta J., 2013. "Who said large banks don’t experience scale economies? Evidence from a risk-return-driven cost function," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 559-585.
    7. Joseph P. Hughes & Loretta J. Mester, 2008. "Efficiency in banking: theory, practice, and evidence," Working Papers 08-1, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
    8. Michael Koetter, 2008. "The stability of bank efficiency rankings when risk preferences and objectives are different," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 115-135.
    9. Berger, Allen N, 1995. "The Profit-Structure Relationship in Banking--Tests of Market-Power and Efficient-Structure Hypotheses," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 27(2), pages 404-431, May.
    10. Ray, Subhash C. & Das, Abhiman, 2010. "Distribution of cost and profit efficiency: Evidence from Indian banking," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(1), pages 297-307, February.
    11. Nurboja, Bashkim & Košak, Marko, 2017. "Banking efficiency in South East Europe: Evidence for financial crises and the gap between new EU members and candidate countries," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 122-138.
    12. Battese, G E & Coelli, T J, 1995. "A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 325-332.
    13. Mukesh Kumar & Vincent Charles & Chandra Sekhar Mishra, 2016. "Evaluating the performance of indian banking sector using DEA during post-reform and global financial crisis," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 156-172, February.
    14. Ms. Brenda Gonzalez-Hermosillo, 1999. "Determinants of Ex-Ante Banking System Distress: A Macro-Micro Empirical Exploration of Some Recent Episodes," IMF Working Papers 1999/033, International Monetary Fund.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mamatzakis, Emmanuel & matousek, roman & vu, anh, 2019. "The interplay between problem loans and Japanese bank productivity," MPRA Paper 92960, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Francesco Aiello & Graziella Bonanno, 2018. "Multilevel empirics for small banks in local markets," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 97(4), pages 1017-1037, November.
    3. Bashkim Nurboja & Marko Košak, 2019. "Cost efficiency and risk as determinants of market share in banking: Evidence from the old and new eu member and candidate countries," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 37(2), pages 499-525.
    4. Rudra Sensarma, 2008. "Deregulation, ownership and profit performance of banks: evidence from India," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(19), pages 1581-1595.
    5. Francesco Aiello & Graziella Bonanno, 2016. "Looking at the determinants of efficiency in banking: evidence from Italian mutual-cooperatives," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 507-526, July.
    6. Mustapha A. Akinkunmi, 2017. "Regulatory Impact of Bank Performance in Nigeria: Application of Stochastic Frontier Analysis," Applied Economics and Finance, Redfame publishing, vol. 4(4), pages 32-43, July.
    7. Ivan Huljak & Reiner Martin & Diego Moccero, 2021. "Bank productivity in CESEE countries," Focus on European Economic Integration, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue Q2/21, pages 83-104.
    8. Ather Hassan Dar & Somesh Kumar Mathur & Sila Mishra, 2021. "The Efficiency of Indian Banks: A DEA, Malmquist and SFA Analysis with Bad Output," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 19(4), pages 653-701, December.
    9. Dong, Yizhe & Firth, Michael & Hou, Wenxuan & Yang, Weiwei, 2016. "Evaluating the performance of Chinese commercial banks: A comparative analysis of different types of banks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(1), pages 280-295.
    10. Robert Lensink & Aljar Meesters, 2014. "Institutions and Bank Performance: A Stochastic Frontier Analysis," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 76(1), pages 67-92, February.
    11. Ivan Huljak & Reiner Martin & Diego Moccero, 2022. "The productivity growth of euro area banks," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 15-33, August.
    12. Huljak, Ivan & Martin, Reiner & Moccero, Diego, 2019. "The cost-efficiency and productivity growth of euro area banks," Working Paper Series 2305, European Central Bank.
    13. Diego Restrepo-Tobón & Subal Kumbhakar & Kai Sun, 2015. "Obelix vs. Asterix: Size of US commercial banks and its regulatory challenge," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 125-168, October.
    14. Aiello, Francesco & Bonanno, Graziella, 2016. "Bank efficiency and local market conditions. Evidence from Italy," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 70-90.
    15. Shrimal Perera & Michael Skully & J. Wickramanayake, 2007. "Cost Efficiency in South Asian Banking: The Impact of Bank Size, State Ownership and Stock Exchange Listings," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 7(1‐2), pages 35-60, March.
    16. Beccalli, Elena & Anolli, Mario & Borello, Giuliana, 2015. "Are European banks too big? Evidence on economies of scale," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 232-246.
    17. Francisca Pacheco & Rafael Sánchez & Mauricio G. Villena, 2021. "Estimating local government efficiency using a panel data parametric approach: the case of Chilean municipalities," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(3), pages 292-314, January.
    18. Tsionas, Mike G. & Andrikopoulos, Athanasios, 2020. "On a High-Dimensional Model Representation method based on Copulas," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(3), pages 967-979.
    19. Massimiliano Piacenza & Gilberto Turati, 2014. "Does Fiscal Discipline Towards Subnational Governments Affect Citizens' Well‐Being? Evidence On Health," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(2), pages 199-224, February.
    20. Joseph P. Hughes & Loretta J. Mester, 2013. "Measuring the Performance of Banks: Theory, Practice, Evidence, and Some Policy Implications," Departmental Working Papers 201322, Rutgers University, Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:8:y:2020:i:4:p:135-:d:458767. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.