IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v7y2019i2p68-d240529.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ruin Probability Functions and Severity of Ruin as a Statistical Decision Problem

Author

Listed:
  • Emilio Gómez-Déniz

    (Department of Quantitative Methods and Institute of Tourism and Sustainable Economic Development (TIDES), University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, E-35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain)

  • José María Sarabia

    (Department of Economics, University of Cantabria, E-39005 Santander, Spain)

  • Enrique Calderín-Ojeda

    (Centre for Actuarial Studies, Department of Economics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia)

Abstract

It is known that the classical ruin function under exponential claim-size distribution depends on two parameters, which are referred to as the mean claim size and the relative security loading. These parameters are assumed to be unknown and random, thus, a loss function that measures the loss sustained by a decision-maker who takes as valid a ruin function which is not correct can be considered. By using squared-error loss function and appropriate distribution function for these parameters, the issue of estimating the ruin function derives in a mixture procedure. Firstly, a bivariate distribution for mixing jointly the two parameters is considered, and second, different univariate distributions for mixing both parameters separately are examined. Consequently, a catalogue of ruin probability functions and severity of ruin, which are more flexible than the original one, are obtained. The methodology is also extended to the Pareto claim size distribution. Several numerical examples illustrate the performance of these functions.

Suggested Citation

  • Emilio Gómez-Déniz & José María Sarabia & Enrique Calderín-Ojeda, 2019. "Ruin Probability Functions and Severity of Ruin as a Statistical Decision Problem," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-16, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:7:y:2019:i:2:p:68-:d:240529
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/7/2/68/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/7/2/68/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Albrecher, Hansjörg & Constantinescu, Corina & Loisel, Stephane, 2011. "Explicit ruin formulas for models with dependence among risks," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 265-270, March.
    2. Colin M. Ramsay & Miguel Arturo Usábel Rodrigo, 1997. "Calculating ruin probabilities via product integration," Documentos de trabajo de la Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales 97-15, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales.
    3. Ramsay, Colin M. & Usabel, Miguel A., 1997. "Calculating Ruin Probabilities via Product Integration," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(2), pages 263-271, November.
    4. Schmidli, Hanspeter, 1999. "On the Distribution of the Surplus Prior and at Ruin," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(2), pages 227-244, November.
    5. Ramsay, Colin M., 2003. "A solution to the ruin problem for Pareto distributions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 109-116, August.
    6. Gordy, Michael B, 1998. "Computationally Convenient Distributional Assumptions for Common-Value Auctions," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 12(1), pages 61-78, August.
    7. Gerber, Hans U. & Goovaerts, Marc J. & Kaas, Rob, 1987. "On the Probability and Severity of Ruin," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(2), pages 151-163, November.
    8. Dickson,David C. M., 2005. "Insurance Risk and Ruin," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521846400.
    9. Garcia, Jorge M.A., 2005. "Explicit Solutions for Survival Probabilities in the Classical Risk Model," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 35(1), pages 113-130, May.
    10. Ghitany, M.E. & Atieh, B. & Nadarajah, S., 2008. "Lindley distribution and its application," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 78(4), pages 493-506.
    11. Dickson, David C. M. & Waters, Howard R., 1992. "The Probability and Severity of Ruin in Finite and Infinite Time," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(2), pages 177-190, November.
    12. Kazutoshi Yamazaki, 2017. "Phase-type Approximation of the Gerber-Shiu Function," Papers 1701.02798, arXiv.org.
    13. Heilmann, Wolf-Rudiger, 1989. "Decision theoretic foundations of credibility theory," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 77-95, March.
    14. Seal, Hilary L., 1980. "Survival Probabilities Based on Pareto Claim Distributions," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(1), pages 61-71, June.
    15. Sarabia, José María & Gómez-Déniz, Emilio & Prieto, Faustino & Jordá, Vanesa, 2018. "Aggregation Of Dependent Risks In Mixtures Of Exponential Distributions And Extensions," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 48(3), pages 1079-1107, September.
    16. Tamturk, Muhsin & Utev, Sergey, 2018. "Ruin probability via Quantum Mechanics Approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 69-74.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Olena Ragulina & Jonas Šiaulys, 2020. "Upper Bounds and Explicit Formulas for the Ruin Probability in the Risk Model with Stochastic Premiums and a Multi-Layer Dividend Strategy," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-35, October.
    2. Emilio Gómez-Déniz & Jorge V. Pérez-Rodríguez & Simón Sosvilla-Rivero, 2022. "Analyzing How the Social Security Reserve Fund in Spain Affects the Sustainability of the Pension System," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emilio Gómez-Déniz & Jorge V. Pérez-Rodríguez & Simón Sosvilla-Rivero, 2022. "Analyzing How the Social Security Reserve Fund in Spain Affects the Sustainability of the Pension System," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Lin, X. Sheldon & Willmot, Gordon E., 2000. "The moments of the time of ruin, the surplus before ruin, and the deficit at ruin," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 19-44, August.
    3. Dickson, David C.M., 2016. "A note on some joint distribution functions involving the time of ruin," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 120-124.
    4. Woo, Jae-Kyung, 2011. "Refinements of two-sided bounds for renewal equations," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 189-196, March.
    5. Sheldon Lin, X. & E. Willmot, Gordon & Drekic, Steve, 2003. "The classical risk model with a constant dividend barrier: analysis of the Gerber-Shiu discounted penalty function," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 551-566, December.
    6. Cheng, Yebin & Tang, Qihe & Yang, Hailiang, 2002. "Approximations for moments of deficit at ruin with exponential and subexponential claims," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 59(4), pages 367-378, October.
    7. Usabel, Miguel, 1999. "Calculating multivariate ruin probabilities via Gaver-Stehfest inversion technique," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 133-142, November.
    8. Ramsden, Lewis & Papaioannou, Apostolos D., 2019. "Ruin probabilities under capital constraints," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 273-282.
    9. Psarrakos, Georgios & Politis, Konstadinos, 2008. "Tail bounds for the joint distribution of the surplus prior to and at ruin," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 163-176, February.
    10. Loisel, Stéphane & Trufin, Julien, 2014. "Properties of a risk measure derived from the expected area in red," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 191-199.
    11. Gómez-Déniz, Emilio & Sordo, Miguel A. & Calderín-Ojeda, Enrique, 2014. "The Log–Lindley distribution as an alternative to the beta regression model with applications in insurance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 49-57.
    12. Furman, Edward & Kye, Yisub & Su, Jianxi, 2021. "Multiplicative background risk models: Setting a course for the idiosyncratic risk factors distributed phase-type," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 153-167.
    13. Furman, Edward & Kuznetsov, Alexey & Zitikis, Ričardas, 2018. "Weighted risk capital allocations in the presence of systematic risk," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 75-81.
    14. Fouad Marri & Khouzeima Moutanabbir, 2021. "Risk aggregation and capital allocation using a new generalized Archimedean copula," Papers 2103.10989, arXiv.org.
    15. Muhsin Tamturk & Dominic Cortis & Mark Farrell, 2020. "Examining the Effects of Gradual Catastrophes on Capital Modelling and the Solvency of Insurers: The Case of COVID-19," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-13, December.
    16. Fouad Marri & Khouzeima Moutanabbir, 2021. "Risk aggregation and capital allocation using a new generalized Archimedean copula," Working Papers hal-03169291, HAL.
    17. Gerber, Hans U. & Landry, Bruno, 1998. "On the discounted penalty at ruin in a jump-diffusion and the perpetual put option," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 263-276, July.
    18. Usabel, M. A., 1999. "Practical approximations for multivariate characteristics of risk processes," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 397-413, December.
    19. Castañer, A. & Claramunt, M.M. & Lefèvre, C. & Loisel, S., 2015. "Discrete Schur-constant models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 343-362.
    20. Franck Adékambi & Kokou Essiomle, 2020. "Ruin Probability for Stochastic Flows of Financial Contract under Phase-Type Distribution," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-21, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:7:y:2019:i:2:p:68-:d:240529. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.