IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v9y2021i3p223-d485804.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mean Squared Variance Portfolio: A Mixed-Integer Linear Programming Formulation

Author

Listed:
  • Francisco Fernández-Navarro

    (Department of Quantitative Methods, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, 41704 Sevilla, Spain)

  • Luisa Martínez-Nieto

    (Department of Financial Economics and Accounting, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, 41704 Sevilla, Spain)

  • Mariano Carbonero-Ruz

    (Department of Quantitative Methods, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, 41704 Sevilla, Spain)

  • Teresa Montero-Romero

    (Department of Financial Economics and Accounting, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, 41704 Sevilla, Spain)

Abstract

The mean-variance (MV) portfolio is typically formulated as a quadratic programming (QP) problem that linearly combines the conflicting objectives of minimizing the risk and maximizing the expected return through a risk aversion profile parameter. In this formulation, the two objectives are expressed in different units, an issue that could definitely hamper obtaining a more competitive set of portfolio weights. For example, a modification in the scale in which returns are expressed (by one or percent) in the MV portfolio, implies a modification in the solution of the problem. Motivated by this issue, a novel mean squared variance (MSV) portfolio is proposed in this paper. The associated optimization problem of the proposed strategy is very similar to the Markowitz optimization, with the exception of the portfolio mean, which is presented in squared form in our formulation. The resulting portfolio model is a non-convex QP problem, which has been reformulated as a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) problem. The reformulation of the initial non-convex QP problem into an MILP allows for future researchers and practitioners to obtain the global solution of the problem via the use of current state-of-the-art MILP solvers. Additionally, a novel purely data-driven method for determining the optimal value of the hyper-parameter that is associated with the MV and MSV approaches is also proposed in this paper. The MSV portfolio has been empirically tested on eight portfolio time series problems with three different estimation windows (composing a total of 24 datasets), showing very competitive performance in most of the problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Francisco Fernández-Navarro & Luisa Martínez-Nieto & Mariano Carbonero-Ruz & Teresa Montero-Romero, 2021. "Mean Squared Variance Portfolio: A Mixed-Integer Linear Programming Formulation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-13, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:3:p:223-:d:485804
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/3/223/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/3/223/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ron Bird & Mark Tippett, 1986. "Note---Naive Diversification and Portfolio Risk---A Note," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 244-251, February.
    2. Victor DeMiguel & Lorenzo Garlappi & Raman Uppal, 2009. "Optimal Versus Naive Diversification: How Inefficient is the 1-N Portfolio Strategy?," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 22(5), pages 1915-1953, May.
    3. Guillaume Coqueret, 2015. "Diversified minimum-variance portfolios," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 221-241, May.
    4. Guillaume Coqueret, 2015. "Diversified minimum-variance portfolios," Post-Print hal-02312223, HAL.
    5. Bodnar, Taras & Parolya, Nestor & Schmid, Wolfgang, 2018. "Estimation of the global minimum variance portfolio in high dimensions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(1), pages 371-390.
    6. Maillet, Bertrand & Tokpavi, Sessi & Vaucher, Benoit, 2015. "Global minimum variance portfolio optimisation under some model risk: A robust regression-based approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 289-299.
    7. Vijay K. Chopra & William T. Ziemba, 2013. "The Effect of Errors in Means, Variances, and Covariances on Optimal Portfolio Choice," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 21, pages 365-373, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    8. Laurens Swinkels & Liam Tjong-A-Tjoe, 2007. "Can mutual funds time investment styles?," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(2), pages 123-132, July.
    9. Haotian Cai & Anatoly B. Schmidt, 0. "Comparing mean–variance portfolios and equal-weight portfolios for major US equity indexes," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-7.
    10. Tu, Jun & Zhou, Guofu, 2011. "Markowitz meets Talmud: A combination of sophisticated and naive diversification strategies," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(1), pages 204-215, January.
    11. Maillet, Bertrand & Tokpavi, Sessi & Vaucher, Benoit, 2015. "Global minimum variance portfolio optimisation under some model risk: A robust regression-based approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 289-299.
    12. Angela J. Black & David G. McMillan, 2004. "Non‐linear Predictability of Value and Growth Stocks and Economic Activity," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3‐4), pages 439-474, April.
    13. repec:dau:papers:123456789/14735 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Apostolos Kourtis, 2015. "A Stability Approach to Mean-Variance Optimization," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 50(3), pages 301-330, August.
    15. Anatoly B. Schmidt, 2019. "Managing portfolio diversity within the mean variance theory," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 282(1), pages 315-329, November.
    16. Best, Michael J & Grauer, Robert R, 1991. "On the Sensitivity of Mean-Variance-Efficient Portfolios to Changes in Asset Means: Some Analytical and Computational Results," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 4(2), pages 315-342.
    17. William F. Sharpe, 1964. "Capital Asset Prices: A Theory Of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions Of Risk," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 19(3), pages 425-442, September.
    18. Haotian Cai & Anatoly B. Schmidt, 2020. "Comparing mean–variance portfolios and equal-weight portfolios for major US equity indexes," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(4), pages 326-332, July.
    19. Bertrand Maillet & Sessi Tokpavi & Benoît Vaucher, 2015. "Global minimum variance portfolio optimisation under some model risk : A robust regression-based approach," Post-Print hal-02312329, HAL.
    20. Liesiö, Juuso & Xu, Peng & Kuosmanen, Timo, 2020. "Portfolio diversification based on stochastic dominance under incomplete probability information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(2), pages 755-768.
    21. Wei Xia & Juan C. Vera & Luis F. Zuluaga, 2020. "Globally Solving Nonconvex Quadratic Programs via Linear Integer Programming Techniques," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(1), pages 40-56, January.
    22. Guillaume Coqueret, 2015. "Diversified minimum-variance portfolios," Post-Print hal-02009587, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Platanakis, Emmanouil & Sakkas, Athanasios & Sutcliffe, Charles, 2019. "Harmful diversification: Evidence from alternative investments," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 1-23.
    2. Guillaume Coqueret, 2016. "Empirical properties of a heterogeneous agent model in large dimensions," Post-Print hal-02088097, HAL.
    3. Bonaccolto, Giovanni & Caporin, Massimiliano & Maillet, Bertrand B., 2022. "Dynamic large financial networks via conditional expected shortfalls," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(1), pages 322-336.
    4. Carroll, Rachael & Conlon, Thomas & Cotter, John & Salvador, Enrique, 2017. "Asset allocation with correlation: A composite trade-off," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(3), pages 1164-1180.
    5. Wolfgang Bessler & Georgi Taushanov & Dominik Wolff, 2021. "Factor investing and asset allocation strategies: a comparison of factor versus sector optimization," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(6), pages 488-506, October.
    6. Guillaume Coqueret, 2017. "Empirical properties of a heterogeneous agent model in large dimensions," Post-Print hal-02000726, HAL.
    7. Fabrizio Cipollini & Giampiero Gallo & Alessandro Palandri, 2020. "A Dynamic Conditional Approach to Portfolio Weights Forecasting," Econometrics Working Papers Archive 2020_06, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Statistica, Informatica, Applicazioni "G. Parenti".
    8. Coqueret, Guillaume, 2017. "Empirical properties of a heterogeneous agent model in large dimensions," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 180-201.
    9. Ding, Wenliang & Shu, Lianjie & Gu, Xinhua, 2023. "A robust Glasso approach to portfolio selection in high dimensions," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 22-37.
    10. Sandra Caçador & Joana Matos Dias & Pedro Godinho, 2020. "Global minimum variance portfolios under uncertainty: a robust optimization approach," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 76(2), pages 267-293, February.
    11. Mazin A.M. Al Janabi, 2021. "Is optimum always optimal? A revisit of the mean‐variance method under nonlinear measures of dependence and non‐normal liquidity constraints," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(3), pages 387-415, April.
    12. Guillaume Coqueret, 2017. "Empirical properties of a heterogeneous agent model in large dimensions," Post-Print hal-02312186, HAL.
    13. Gilles Boevi Koumou, 2020. "Diversification and portfolio theory: a review," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 34(3), pages 267-312, September.
    14. Ammann, Manuel & Coqueret, Guillaume & Schade, Jan-Philip, 2016. "Characteristics-based portfolio choice with leverage constraints," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 23-37.
    15. Erindi Allaj, 2020. "The Black–Litterman model and views from a reverse optimization procedure: an out-of-sample performance evaluation," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 465-492, October.
    16. Hongxin Zhao & Lingchen Kong & Hou-Duo Qi, 2021. "Optimal portfolio selections via $$\ell _{1, 2}$$ ℓ 1 , 2 -norm regularization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 80(3), pages 853-881, December.
    17. Ruili Sun & Tiefeng Ma & Shuangzhe Liu & Milind Sathye, 2019. "Improved Covariance Matrix Estimation for Portfolio Risk Measurement: A Review," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-34, March.
    18. Philippe Bertrand & Vincent Lapointe, 2018. "Risk-based strategies: the social responsibility of investment universes does matter," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 262(2), pages 413-429, March.
    19. Al Janabi, Mazin A.M. & Arreola Hernandez, Jose & Berger, Theo & Nguyen, Duc Khuong, 2017. "Multivariate dependence and portfolio optimization algorithms under illiquid market scenarios," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(3), pages 1121-1131.
    20. Alireza Ghahtarani & Ahmed Saif & Alireza Ghasemi, 2022. "Robust portfolio selection problems: a comprehensive review," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3203-3264, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:3:p:223-:d:485804. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.