IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v9y2021i17p2035-d621008.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Respondent Burden Effects on Item Non-Response and Careless Response Rates: An Analysis of Two Types of Surveys

Author

Listed:
  • Álvaro Briz-Redón

    (Department of Statistics and Operations Research, University of Valencia, 46100 Burjassot, Spain
    Statistics Office, City Council of Valencia, 46002 Valencia, Spain)

Abstract

The respondent burden refers to the effort required by a respondent to answer a questionnaire. Although this concept was introduced decades ago, few studies have focused on the quantitative detection of such a burden. In this paper, a face-to-face survey and a telephone survey conducted in Valencia (Spain) are analyzed. The presence of burden is studied in terms of both item non-response rates and careless response rates. In particular, two moving-window statistics based on the coefficient of unalikeability and the average longstring index are proposed for characterizing careless responding. Item non-response and careless response rates are modeled for each survey by using mixed-effects models, including respondent-level and question-level covariates and also temporal random effects to assess the existence of respondent burden during the questionnaire. The results suggest that the sociodemographic characteristics of the respondents and the typology of the question impact item non-response and careless response rates. Moreover, the estimates of the temporal random effects indicate that item non-response and careless response rates are time-varying, suggesting the presence of respondent burden. In particular, an increasing trend in item non-response rates in the telephone survey has been found, which supports the hypothesis of the burden. Regarding careless responding, despite the presence of some temporal variation, no clear trend has been identified.

Suggested Citation

  • Álvaro Briz-Redón, 2021. "Respondent Burden Effects on Item Non-Response and Careless Response Rates: An Analysis of Two Types of Surveys," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(17), pages 1-16, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:17:p:2035-:d:621008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/17/2035/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/17/2035/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. G. Warriner, 1991. "Accuracy of self-reports to the burdensome question: survey response and nonresponse error trade-offs," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 253-269, August.
    2. Lindgren, Finn & Rue, Håvard, 2015. "Bayesian Spatial Modelling with R-INLA," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 63(i19).
    3. Silvia Ferrari & Francisco Cribari-Neto, 2004. "Beta Regression for Modelling Rates and Proportions," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(7), pages 799-815.
    4. Håvard Rue & Sara Martino & Nicolas Chopin, 2009. "Approximate Bayesian inference for latent Gaussian models by using integrated nested Laplace approximations," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(2), pages 319-392, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cho, Daegon & Hwang, Youngdeok & Park, Jongwon, 2018. "More buzz, more vibes: Impact of social media on concert distribution," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 103-113.
    2. Andre Python & Andreas Bender & Marta Blangiardo & Janine B. Illian & Ying Lin & Baoli Liu & Tim C.D. Lucas & Siwei Tan & Yingying Wen & Davit Svanidze & Jianwei Yin, 2022. "A downscaling approach to compare COVID‐19 count data from databases aggregated at different spatial scales," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(1), pages 202-218, January.
    3. Jacqueline D. Seufert & Andre Python & Christoph Weisser & Elías Cisneros & Krisztina Kis‐Katos & Thomas Kneib, 2022. "Mapping ex ante risks of COVID‐19 in Indonesia using a Bayesian geostatistical model on airport network data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(4), pages 2121-2155, October.
    4. Johnson, Blair T. & Sisti, Anthony & Bernstein, Mary & Chen, Kun & Hennessy, Emily A. & Acabchuk, Rebecca L. & Matos, Michaela, 2021. "Community-level factors and incidence of gun violence in the United States, 2014–2017," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    5. Zhang, Shen & Liu, Xin & Tang, Jinjun & Cheng, Shaowu & Qi, Yong & Wang, Yinhai, 2018. "Spatio-temporal modeling of destination choice behavior through the Bayesian hierarchical approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 512(C), pages 537-551.
    6. Paige, John & Fuglstad, Geir-Arne & Riebler, Andrea & Wakefield, Jon, 2022. "Bayesian multiresolution modeling of georeferenced data: An extension of ‘LatticeKrig’," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    7. Daniela Castro‐Camilo & Raphaël Huser & Håvard Rue, 2022. "Practical strategies for generalized extreme value‐based regression models for extremes," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(6), September.
    8. Aaron Osgood‐Zimmerman & Jon Wakefield, 2023. "A Statistical Review of Template Model Builder: A Flexible Tool for Spatial Modelling," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 91(2), pages 318-342, August.
    9. William Gonzalez Daza & Renata L. Muylaert & Thadeu Sobral-Souza & Victor Lemes Landeiro, 2023. "Malaria Risk Drivers in the Brazilian Amazon: Land Use—Land Cover Interactions and Biological Diversity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(15), pages 1-16, August.
    10. Sameh Abdulah & Yuxiao Li & Jian Cao & Hatem Ltaief & David E. Keyes & Marc G. Genton & Ying Sun, 2023. "Large‐scale environmental data science with ExaGeoStatR," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), February.
    11. John M. Humphreys & Robert B. Srygley & David H. Branson, 2022. "Geographic Variation in Migratory Grasshopper Recruitment under Projected Climate Change," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-19, January.
    12. John M. Humphreys, 2022. "Amplification in Time and Dilution in Space: Partitioning Spatiotemporal Processes to Assess the Role of Avian-Host Phylodiversity in Shaping Eastern Equine Encephalitis Virus Distribution," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-16, July.
    13. Dong Liang & Genevieve Nesslage & Michael Wilberg & Thomas Miller, 2017. "Bayesian Calibration of Blue Crab (Callinectes sapidus) Abundance Indices Based on Probability Surveys," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 22(4), pages 481-497, December.
    14. Silius M. Vandeskog & Sara Martino & Daniela Castro-Camilo & Håvard Rue, 2022. "Modelling Sub-daily Precipitation Extremes with the Blended Generalised Extreme Value Distribution," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 27(4), pages 598-621, December.
    15. Humphreys, John M. & Srygley, Robert B. & Lawton, Douglas & Hudson, Amy R. & Branson, David H., 2022. "Grasshoppers exhibit asynchrony and spatial non-stationarity in response to the El Niño/Southern and Pacific Decadal Oscillations," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 471(C).
    16. Carlos Díaz-Avalos & Pablo Juan & Somnath Chaudhuri & Marc Sáez & Laura Serra, 2020. "Association between the New COVID-19 Cases and Air Pollution with Meteorological Elements in Nine Counties of New York State," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-18, December.
    17. Beręsewicz Maciej, 2019. "Correlates of Representation Errors in Internet Data Sources for Real Estate Market," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 35(3), pages 509-529, September.
    18. Deslatte, Aaron & Scott, Tyler A. & Carter, David P., 2019. "Specialized governance and regional land-use outcomes: A spatial analysis of Florida community development districts," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 227-239.
    19. Chien-Chou Chen & Guo-Jun Lo & Ta-Chien Chan, 2022. "Spatial Analysis on Supply and Demand of Adult Surgical Masks in Taipei Metropolitan Areas in the Early Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-12, May.
    20. Chiranjit Dutta & Nalini Ravishanker & Sumanta Basu, 2022. "Modeling Multivariate Positive-Valued Time Series Using R-INLA," Papers 2206.05374, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:17:p:2035-:d:621008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.