IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v9y2021i14p1655-d594035.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Motivations, Barriers and Risk-Taking When Investing in Cryptocurrencies

Author

Listed:
  • Zdenek Smutny

    (Faculty of Informatics and Statistics, Prague University of Economics and Business, W. Churchill Sq. 1938/4, 13067 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Zdenek Sulc

    (Faculty of Informatics and Statistics, Prague University of Economics and Business, W. Churchill Sq. 1938/4, 13067 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Jan Lansky

    (Faculty of Economic Studies, University of Finance and Administration, Estonska 500/3, 10100 Prague, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The cryptocurrency market is very young, volatile, and highly risky. By the end of 2020, a new bull run started, and the prices of several cryptocurrencies reached record-breaking highs. The factors affecting this rise of cryptocurrencies include the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, the economic crisis and the global increase in the inflation rate, as well as the gradual acceptance and adoption of cryptocurrencies by people worldwide. This exploratory research is focused on this last factor, i.e., using cryptocurrency and with it, the associated support of its ecosystem (e.g., mining, staking). A survey was carried out investigating the motivational factors and barriers to investment in cryptocurrency for Czech representatives of Generations Y and Z (18–42 years; n = 468). The geographic scope was nationwide, and quota sampling was used. Notably, this survey was carried out prior to the global COVID-19 pandemic outbreak, and it is thus not affected by the pandemic and its related economic impacts. The article investigates the dependency between the individual motivational factors and barriers from the perspective of the tendency to take risks (using the risk propensity scale), according to gender and representation of Generations Y and Z. The lack of information on this form of investment is considered as the main barrier to investment in cryptocurrency, with respect to sex and generations. Compared to that, a negative experience with investment in cryptocurrency constitutes the most minor barrier. Respondents that have a tendency to take risks are mostly put off by their lack of experience with investment in general. The main motivational factor for investment in cryptocurrency, with respect to sex and generations, is considered to be the speed of increase in cryptocurrency value. On the other hand, the least encouraging factor is the opportunity to use the high volatility of cryptocurrency for speculative trading. Interestingly, this factor mostly encourages respondents that do not have a tendency to take risks. The findings are discussed, along with the presentation of their implications for practice and the directions of further explanatory research.

Suggested Citation

  • Zdenek Smutny & Zdenek Sulc & Jan Lansky, 2021. "Motivations, Barriers and Risk-Taking When Investing in Cryptocurrencies," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(14), pages 1-22, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:14:p:1655-:d:594035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/14/1655/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/14/1655/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bresnahan, Timothy F. & Trajtenberg, M., 1995. "General purpose technologies 'Engines of growth'?," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 83-108, January.
    2. Zoltan Ban & Jan Lansky & Stanislava Mildeova & Petr Tesar, 2019. "A Probe Survey of Bitcoin Transactions Through Analysis of Advertising in an On-Line Discussion Forum," Acta Informatica Pragensia, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2019(2), pages 112-131.
    3. Kristin Johnson & Brian S. Krueger, 2021. "Who Supports Using Cryptocurrencies and Why Public Education About Blockchain Technology Matters?," Public Administration and Information Technology, in: Christopher G. Reddick & Manuel Pedro Rodríguez-Bolívar & Hans Jochen Scholl (ed.), Blockchain and the Public Sector, edition 1, chapter 0, pages 127-149, Springer.
    4. Bannier, Christina & Meyll, Tobias & Röder, Florian & Walter, Andreas, 2019. "The gender gap in ‘Bitcoin literacy’," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 129-134.
    5. Ayana T Aspembitova & Ling Feng & Lock Yue Chew, 2021. "Behavioral structure of users in cryptocurrency market," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-19, January.
    6. Ed Saiedi & Anders Broström & Felipe Ruiz, 2021. "Global drivers of cryptocurrency infrastructure adoption," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 353-406, June.
    7. Wei Sun & Alisher Tohirovich Dedahanov & Ho Young Shin & Ki Su Kim, 2020. "Switching intention to crypto-currency market: Factors predisposing some individuals to risky investment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, June.
    8. Emna Mnif & Anis Jarboui, 2021. "COVID-19, bitcoin market efficiency, herd behaviour," Review of Behavioral Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(1), pages 69-84, March.
    9. Vítor Fonseca & Luís Pacheco & Júlio Lobão, 2019. "Psychological barriers in the cryptocurrency market," Review of Behavioral Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(2), pages 151-169, August.
    10. Lee, Adrian D. & Li, Mengling & Zheng, Huanhuan, 2020. "Bitcoin: Speculative asset or innovative technology?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    11. Leslie Haddon, 2006. "The contribution of domestication research to in-home computing and media consumption," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 62631, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Shahzad, Fakhar & Xiu, GuoYi & Wang, Jian & Shahbaz, Muhammad, 2018. "An empirical investigation on the adoption of cryptocurrencies among the people of mainland China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 33-40.
    13. Frantisek Sudzina, 2018. "Distribution of Foreign Aid in Cryptocurrencies: Initial Considerations," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 24(4), pages 387-388, November.
    14. Zdenek Smutny & Vasja Vehovar, 2020. "Social Informatics Research: Schools of Thought, Methodological Basis, and Thematic Conceptualization," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(5), pages 529-539, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vladut Faraonel & Alexandra Raluca Jelea & Mara Matcu, 2022. "Romanian Students’ Perception of Cryptocurrency," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 545-551, September.
    2. Álvaro Hernández Sánchez & Beatriz María Sastre-Hernández & Javier Jorge-Vazquez & Sergio Luis Náñez Alonso, 2024. "Cryptocurrencies, Tax Ignorance and Tax Noncompliance in Direct Taxation: Spanish Empirical Evidence," Economies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-25, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. McMorrow Jake & Esfahani Mona Seyed, 2021. "An Exploration into People’s Perception and Intention on using Cryptocurrencies," HOLISTICA – Journal of Business and Public Administration, Sciendo, vol. 12(2), pages 109-144, August.
    2. Bommer, William H. & Milevoj, Emil & Rana, Shailesh, 2023. "The intention to use cryptocurrency: A meta-analysis of what we know," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    3. Eloy Gil-Cordero & Juan Pedro Cabrera-Sánchez & Manuel Jesús Arrás-Cortés, 2020. "Cryptocurrencies as a Financial Tool: Acceptance Factors," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Antonin BERGEAUD & Gilbert Cette & Rémy Lecat, 2017. "What role did education, equipment age and technology play in 20th century productivity growth?," Rue de la Banque, Banque de France, issue 43, may..
    5. Matthijs J. Janssen, 2015. "Cross-specialization: A New Perspective on Industry Policy," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1519, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jun 2015.
    6. Marina Rybalka, 2015. "The innovative input mix. Assessing the importance of R&D and ICT investments for firm performance in manufacturing and services," Discussion Papers 801, Statistics Norway, Research Department.
    7. Irene Bertschek & Joern Block & Alexander S. Kritikos & Caroline Stiel, 2024. "German financial state aid during Covid-19 pandemic: Higher impact among digitalized self-employed," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1-2), pages 76-97, January.
    8. repec:ipg:wpaper:2014-587 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Briglauer, Wolfgang & Dürr, Niklas S. & Gugler, Klaus, 2019. "A retrospective study on the regional benefits and spillover effects of high-speed broadband networks: Evidence from German counties," ZEW Discussion Papers 19-026, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    10. Janet L. Yellen, 2005. "The U.S. economic outlook," Speech 5, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
    11. Patricia Crifo & Etienne Lehmann, 2001. "Why the Kuznets Curve Will Always Reverse," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00150324, HAL.
    12. Szalavetz, Andrea, 2002. "Az informatikai szektor és a felzárkózó gazdaságok [The informatics sector and the advancing economies]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(9), pages 794-804.
    13. Helpman, Elhanan & Trajtenberg, Manuel, 1994. "A Time to Sow and a Time to Reap: Growth Based on General Purpose Technologies," CEPR Discussion Papers 1080, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    14. Czarnitzki, Dirk & Fernández, Gastón P. & Rammer, Christian, 2023. "Artificial intelligence and firm-level productivity," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 188-205.
    15. Claire M. Weiller & Michael G. Pollitt, 2013. "Platform markets and energy services," Working Papers EPRG 1334, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    16. Antonelli, Cristiano, 2017. "Digital knowledge generation and the appropriability trade-off," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(10), pages 991-1002.
    17. Slowak, André P., 2009. "Market fields structure & dynamics in industrial automation," FZID Discussion Papers 02-2009, University of Hohenheim, Center for Research on Innovation and Services (FZID).
    18. Olsson, Ola, 2001. "Why Does Technology Advance in Cycles?," Working Papers in Economics 38, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
    19. Aghion, Philippe & Akcigit, Ufuk & Howitt, Peter, 2014. "What Do We Learn From Schumpeterian Growth Theory?," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 515-563, Elsevier.
    20. Ghisetti, Claudia, 2017. "Demand-pull and environmental innovations: Estimating the effects of innovative public procurement," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 178-187.
    21. Battke, Benedikt & Schmidt, Tobias S. & Stollenwerk, Stephan & Hoffmann, Volker H., 2016. "Internal or external spillovers—Which kind of knowledge is more likely to flow within or across technologies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 27-41.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:14:p:1655-:d:594035. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.