IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v8y2020i6p972-d371047.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance Evaluation of Deep Learning-Based Gated Recurrent Units (GRUs) and Tree-Based Models for Estimating ETo by Using Limited Meteorological Variables

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Taghi Sattari

    (Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 51666, Iran
    Department of Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Ankara University, Ankara 06110, Turkey)

  • Halit Apaydin

    (Department of Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Ankara University, Ankara 06110, Turkey)

  • Shahaboddin Shamshirband

    (Department for Management of Science and Technology Development, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
    Faculty of Information Technology, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam)

Abstract

The amount of water allocated to irrigation systems is significantly greater than the amount allocated to other sectors. Thus, irrigation water demand management is at the center of the attention of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry in Turkey. To plan more effective irrigation systems in agriculture, it is necessary to accurately calculate plant water requirements. In this study, daily reference evapotranspiration (ETo) values were estimated using tree-based regression and deep learning-based gated recurrent unit (GRU) models. For this purpose, 15 input scenarios, consisting of meteorological variables including maximum and minimum temperature, wind speed, maximum and minimum relative humidity, dew point temperature, and sunshine duration, were considered. ETo values calculated according to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Penman-Monteith method were considered as model outputs. The results indicate that the random forest model, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9926, is better than the other tree-based models. In addition, the GRU model, with R = 0.9837, presents good performance relative to the other models. In this study, it was found that maximum temperature was more effective in estimating ETo than other variables.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Taghi Sattari & Halit Apaydin & Shahaboddin Shamshirband, 2020. "Performance Evaluation of Deep Learning-Based Gated Recurrent Units (GRUs) and Tree-Based Models for Estimating ETo by Using Limited Meteorological Variables," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-18, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:6:p:972-:d:371047
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/6/972/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/6/972/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Sheng & Lian, Jinjiao & Peng, Yuzhong & Hu, Baoqing & Chen, Hongsong, 2019. "Generalized reference evapotranspiration models with limited climatic data based on random forest and gene expression programming in Guangxi, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 220-230.
    2. Ali Rahimikhoob, 2016. "Comparison of M5 Model Tree and Artificial Neural Network’s Methodologies in Modelling Daily Reference Evapotranspiration from NOAA Satellite Images," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(9), pages 3063-3075, July.
    3. Yusen Wang & Wenlong Liao & Yuqing Chang, 2018. "Gated Recurrent Unit Network-Based Short-Term Photovoltaic Forecasting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Granata, Francesco, 2019. "Evapotranspiration evaluation models based on machine learning algorithms—A comparative study," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 303-315.
    5. Feng, Yu & Cui, Ningbo & Gong, Daozhi & Zhang, Qingwen & Zhao, Lu, 2017. "Evaluation of random forests and generalized regression neural networks for daily reference evapotranspiration modelling," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 163-173.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammadi, Babak & Mehdizadeh, Saeid, 2020. "Modeling daily reference evapotranspiration via a novel approach based on support vector regression coupled with whale optimization algorithm," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    2. Malik, Anurag & Jamei, Mehdi & Ali, Mumtaz & Prasad, Ramendra & Karbasi, Masoud & Yaseen, Zaher Mundher, 2022. "Multi-step daily forecasting of reference evapotranspiration for different climates of India: A modern multivariate complementary technique reinforced with ridge regression feature selection," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    3. Roy, Dilip Kumar & Lal, Alvin & Sarker, Khokan Kumer & Saha, Kowshik Kumar & Datta, Bithin, 2021. "Optimization algorithms as training approaches for prediction of reference evapotranspiration using adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    4. Wu, Lifeng & Peng, Youwen & Fan, Junliang & Wang, Yicheng & Huang, Guomin, 2021. "A novel kernel extreme learning machine model coupled with K-means clustering and firefly algorithm for estimating monthly reference evapotranspiration in parallel computation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    5. Phon Sheng Hou & Lokman Mohd Fadzil & Selvakumar Manickam & Mahmood A. Al-Shareeda, 2023. "Vector Autoregression Model-Based Forecasting of Reference Evapotranspiration in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Yan, Shicheng & Wu, Lifeng & Fan, Junliang & Zhang, Fucang & Zou, Yufeng & Wu, You, 2021. "A novel hybrid WOA-XGB model for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration using local and external meteorological data: Applications in arid and humid regions of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    7. Dilip Kumar Roy & Tapash Kumar Sarkar & Sujit Kumar Biswas & Bithin Datta, 2023. "Generalized Daily Reference Evapotranspiration Models Based on a Hybrid Optimization Algorithm Tuned Fuzzy Tree Approach," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(1), pages 193-218, January.
    8. Chia, Min Yan & Huang, Yuk Feng & Koo, Chai Hoon, 2021. "Swarm-based optimization as stochastic training strategy for estimation of reference evapotranspiration using extreme learning machine," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    9. Ferreira, Lucas Borges & da Cunha, Fernando França, 2020. "New approach to estimate daily reference evapotranspiration based on hourly temperature and relative humidity using machine learning and deep learning," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    10. Tao, Hai & Diop, Lamine & Bodian, Ansoumana & Djaman, Koffi & Ndiaye, Papa Malick & Yaseen, Zaher Mundher, 2018. "Reference evapotranspiration prediction using hybridized fuzzy model with firefly algorithm: Regional case study in Burkina Faso," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 140-151.
    11. Ali Barzkar & Mohammad Najafzadeh & Farshad Homaei, 2022. "Evaluation of drought events in various climatic conditions using data-driven models and a reliability-based probabilistic model," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 110(3), pages 1931-1952, February.
    12. Lu, Yingjie & Li, Tao & Hu, Hui & Zeng, Xuemei, 2023. "Short-term prediction of reference crop evapotranspiration based on machine learning with different decomposition methods in arid areas of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    13. Fabio Di Nunno & Marco De Matteo & Giovanni Izzo & Francesco Granata, 2023. "A Combined Clustering and Trends Analysis Approach for Characterizing Reference Evapotranspiration in Veneto," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-23, July.
    14. Beáta Novotná & Ľuboš Jurík & Ján Čimo & Jozef Palkovič & Branislav Chvíla & Vladimír Kišš, 2022. "Machine Learning for Pan Evaporation Modeling in Different Agroclimatic Zones of the Slovak Republic (Macro-Regions)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-22, March.
    15. Yamaç, Sevim Seda, 2021. "Artificial intelligence methods reliably predict crop evapotranspiration with different combinations of meteorological data for sugar beet in a semiarid area," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    16. Feng, Yu & Hao, Weiping & Li, Haoru & Cui, Ningbo & Gong, Daozhi & Gao, Lili, 2020. "Machine learning models to quantify and map daily global solar radiation and photovoltaic power," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    17. Jessica Wojtkiewicz & Matin Hosseini & Raju Gottumukkala & Terrence Lynn Chambers, 2019. "Hour-Ahead Solar Irradiance Forecasting Using Multivariate Gated Recurrent Units," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-13, October.
    18. Ruijin Zhu & Xuejiao Gong & Shifeng Hu & Yusen Wang, 2019. "Power Quality Disturbances Classification via Fully-Convolutional Siamese Network and k-Nearest Neighbor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-12, December.
    19. Yin, Juan & Deng, Zhen & Ines, Amor V.M. & Wu, Junbin & Rasu, Eeswaran, 2020. "Forecast of short-term daily reference evapotranspiration under limited meteorological variables using a hybrid bi-directional long short-term memory model (Bi-LSTM)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    20. Tomáš Mikita & Zdeněk Patočka & Elizaveta Avoiani, 2023. "Sap flow modelling based on global radiation and canopy parameters derived from a digital surface model," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(8), pages 348-359.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    reference evapotranspiration; deep learning; M5 tree model; random forest; random tree; regression tree;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M5 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:6:p:972-:d:371047. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.