IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i6p1454-d1099720.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Seaport Network Efficiency Measurement Using Triangular and Trapezoidal Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analyses with Liner Shipping Connectivity Index Output

Author

Listed:
  • Dineswary Nadarajan

    (Faculty of Business, Accountancy & Law, SEGi University, Petaling Jaya 47810, Malaysia
    Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia)

  • Saber Abdelall Mohamed Ahmed

    (Department of Applied Statistics, Faculty of Economics & Administration, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia)

  • Noor Fadiya Mohd Noor

    (Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
    Center for Data Analytics Consultancy and Services, Faculty of Science, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia)

Abstract

Seaport network efficiency is very crucial for global maritime economic trades and growth. In this work, data of three years (2018–2020) with input variables (time in port, age of vessels, size of vessels, cargo carrying capacity of vessels) and output variables (Liner Shipping Connectivity Index (LSCI) and Gross Domestic Product (GDP)) are collected. Few screening tests are performed to ensure the data are fit for further analyses. Since none of the existing studies has ever considered LSCI as an output variable, the main purpose of this study is to measure seaport network efficiency based on LSCI using data envelopment analysis (DEA), both classical and fuzzy. In fuzzy DEA, triangular fuzzy number (TrFN) and trapezoidal fuzzy number (TpFN) are used to construct the fuzzy sets of efficiency scores with DEA. The comparison between DEA and triangular fuzzy data envelopment analysis (TrFDEA) shows the range of differences in the results ranges from −0.0274 to 0.0105, while the comparison between DEA and trapezoidal fuzzy data envelopment analysis (TpFDEA) yields the differences within the range of −0.0307 to 0.0106. Using DEA as the relative reference, it is further revealed that the TpFDEA has smaller standard deviations and variances than the TrFDEA in 2018 and 2019, whereas the opposites hold true during the pandemic year of 2020. With the use of fuzzy numbers, the uncertainty levels in the seaport network efficiency measurement can further be investigated as the minimum, mean, median and maximum values are taken into consideration. Moreover, the proposed TrFDEA and TpFDEA lead new insights on the boundedness concept of the efficiency scores, which were never reported before by any researcher, especially in the maritime industry research. Fuzzy regression modelling based on the Possibilistic Linear Regression Least Squares (PLRLS) method was also performed to determine the interval of minimum and maximum connectivity efficiencies, which gave a better estimation than the regular regression model.

Suggested Citation

  • Dineswary Nadarajan & Saber Abdelall Mohamed Ahmed & Noor Fadiya Mohd Noor, 2023. "Seaport Network Efficiency Measurement Using Triangular and Trapezoidal Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analyses with Liner Shipping Connectivity Index Output," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-27, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:6:p:1454-:d:1099720
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/6/1454/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/6/1454/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bottasso, Anna & Conti, Maurizio & Ferrari, Claudio & Merk, Olaf & Tei, Alessio, 2013. "The impact of port throughput on local employment: Evidence from a panel of European regions," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 32-38.
    2. Gordon Wilmsmeier & Jan Hoffmann, 2008. "Liner Shipping Connectivity and Port Infrastructure as Determinants of Freight Rates in the Caribbean," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 10(1-2), pages 130-151, March.
    3. Saeid Jafarzadeh Ghoushchi & Elnaz Osgooei & Gholamreza Haseli & Hana Tomaskova, 2021. "A Novel Approach to Solve Fully Fuzzy Linear Programming Problems with Modified Triangular Fuzzy Numbers," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(22), pages 1-13, November.
    4. Hatami-Marbini, Adel & Emrouznejad, Ali & Tavana, Madjid, 2011. "A taxonomy and review of the fuzzy data envelopment analysis literature: Two decades in the making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(3), pages 457-472, November.
    5. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    6. Sun, Jiasen & Yuan, Yang & Yang, Rui & Ji, Xiang & Wu, Jie, 2017. "Performance evaluation of Chinese port enterprises under significant environmental concerns: An extended DEA-based analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 75-86.
    7. Peter Wanke & Obioma R. Nwaogbe & Zhongfei Chen, 2018. "Efficiency in Nigerian ports: handling imprecise data with a two-stage fuzzy approach," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(5), pages 699-715, July.
    8. Lee, Haekwan & Tanaka, Hideo, 1999. "Upper and lower approximation models in interval regression using regression quantile techniques," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(3), pages 653-666, August.
    9. Jose L. Tongzon, 1989. "The Impact Of Wharfage Costs On Victoria'S Export-Oriented Industries," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 8(4), pages 58-64, December.
    10. Marco Fugazza & Jan Hoffmann, 2017. "Liner shipping connectivity as determinant of trade," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 1-18, December.
    11. Deng, Ping & Lu, Shiqing & Xiao, Hanbin, 2013. "Evaluation of the relevance measure between ports and regional economy using structural equation modeling," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 123-133.
    12. Mohammad Ahmad & Weihu Cheng, 2022. "A Novel Approach of Fuzzy Control Chart with Fuzzy Process Capability Indices Using Alpha Cut Triangular Fuzzy Number," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-15, September.
    13. Ivan Pribićević & Suzana Doljanica & Oliver Momčilović & Dillip Kumar Das & Dragan Pamučar & Željko Stević, 2020. "Novel Extension of DEMATEL Method by Trapezoidal Fuzzy Numbers and D Numbers for Management of Decision-Making Processes," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-16, May.
    14. Tovar, Beatriz & Wall, Alan, 2022. "The relationship between port-level maritime connectivity and efficiency," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    15. Dong-Joon Kang & Su-Han Woo, 2017. "Liner shipping networks, port characteristics and the impact on port performance," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 19(2), pages 274-295, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Courage Mlambo, 2021. "The Impact of Port Performance on Trade: The Case of Selected African States," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Ducruet, César, 2020. "The geography of maritime networks: A critical review," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    3. César Ducruet, 2020. "The geography of maritime networks: A critical review," Post-Print halshs-02922543, HAL.
    4. Ziaul Haque Munim & Hans-Joachim Schramm, 2018. "The impacts of port infrastructure and logistics performance on economic growth: the mediating role of seaborne trade," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Samia Bouazza & Zoubida Benmamoun & Hanaa Hachimi, 2023. "Maritime Bilateral Connectivity Analysis for Sustainable Maritime Growth: Case of Morocco," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-23, March.
    6. Claudio Quintano & Paolo Mazzocchi & Antonella Rocca, 2020. "A competitive analysis of EU ports by fixing spatial and economic dimensions," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Achilleas Tsantis & John Mangan & Agustina Calatayud & Roberto Palacin, 2023. "Container shipping: a systematic literature review of themes and factors that influence the establishment of direct connections between countries," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(4), pages 667-697, December.
    8. Deng, Ping & Song, Lian & Xiao, Ruiqi & Huang, Chengfeng, 2022. "Evaluation of logistics and port connectivity in the Yangtze River Economic Belt of China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 249-267.
    9. Matthias Klumpp & Dominic Loske, 2021. "Sustainability and Resilience Revisited: Impact of Information Technology Disruptions on Empirical Retail Logistics Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, May.
    10. Patricija Bajec & Danijela Tuljak-Suban, 2019. "An Integrated Analytic Hierarchy Process—Slack Based Measure-Data Envelopment Analysis Model for Evaluating the Efficiency of Logistics Service Providers Considering Undesirable Performance Criteria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, April.
    11. Bottasso, Anna & Conti, Maurizio & Ferrari, Claudio & Tei, Alessio, 2014. "Ports and regional development: A spatial analysis on a panel of European regions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 44-55.
    12. Jan Hoffmann & Naima Saeed & Sigbjørn Sødal, 2020. "Liner shipping bilateral connectivity and its impact on South Africa’s bilateral trade flows," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(3), pages 473-499, September.
    13. Adel Hatami-Marbini & Madjid Tavana & Kobra Gholami & Zahra Ghelej Beigi, 2015. "A Bounded Data Envelopment Analysis Model in a Fuzzy Environment with an Application to Safety in the Semiconductor Industry," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 164(2), pages 679-701, February.
    14. Maciej Jewczak & Agata Zoltaczek, 2011. "Technical efficiency evaluation of health care entities in 1999-2009 - spatial and dynamic analysis - a case study of general care hospitals, with the use of DEA method (Ocena efektywnosci technicznej," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 9(33), pages 194-210.
    15. Yang Lin & Longzhong Yan & Ying-Ming Wang, 2019. "Performance Evaluation and Investment Analysis for Container Port Sustainable Development in China: An Inverse DEA Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-13, August.
    16. Loske, Dominic & Klumpp, Matthias, 2021. "Human-AI collaboration in route planning: An empirical efficiency-based analysis in retail logistics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    17. Leonidas Sotirios Kyrgiakos & Georgios Kleftodimos & George Vlontzos & Panos M. Pardalos, 2023. "A systematic literature review of data envelopment analysis implementation in agriculture under the prism of sustainability," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 1-38, March.
    18. Zhao, Deng & Zhen-fu, Li & Yu-tao, Zhou & Xiao, Chen & Shan-shan, Liang, 2020. "Measurement and spatial spillover effects of port comprehensive strength: Empirical evidence from China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 288-298.
    19. Harilaos N. Psaraftis & Thalis Zis, 2021. "Impact assessment of a mandatory operational goal-based short-term measure to reduce GHG emissions from ships: the LDC/SIDS case study," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 445-467, September.
    20. Adel Hatami-Marbini & Per J. Agrell & Hirofumi Fukuyama & Kobra Gholami & Pegah Khoshnevis, 2017. "The role of multiplier bounds in fuzzy data envelopment analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 250(1), pages 249-276, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:6:p:1454-:d:1099720. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.