IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i7p1280-d1177950.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disentangling the Complexity of Regional Ecosystem Degradation: Uncovering the Interconnected Natural-Social Drivers of Quantity and Quality Loss

Author

Listed:
  • Mengyuan Zhang

    (College of Horticulture & Forestry Sciences, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Shuaipeng Chen

    (College of Horticulture & Forestry Sciences, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Wenping Liu

    (College of Horticulture & Forestry Sciences, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
    Research Center for Territorial Spatial Governance and Green Development, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)

Abstract

In the face of the combined effects of economic development and climate change, ecosystems are experiencing unprecedented pressures. It is imperative to diagnose changes in the quantity and quality of ecosystems, as well as identify the integrated natural and social driving mechanisms that underlie these changes, in order to facilitate ecosystem restoration and maintenance. In this study, we analyzed the changes in forest, grassland, farmland, and water ecosystems in Hubei Province, China from 2000 to 2020. We examined the changes in ecosystem quantity by assessing their area, and for evaluating ecosystem quality, we utilized an ecosystem quality index (EQI). To further understand the integrated natural–social driving mechanisms behind the degradation of different types of ecosystems, we selected four natural factors and fifteen socio-economic factors, based on the influences of climate change and human activities. We employed stepwise regression models for analysis. Our study reveals significant degradation of farmland and grassland ecosystems in Hubei Province from 2000 to 2020, reducing by 5.16% and 82.46%, respectively. The water ecosystems have slightly decreased by 1.08%, while and the forest ecosystems has increased by 2.64%. The analysis further highlights that the total area of ecosystem quality degradation in Hubei Province reached 5.34%. Additionally, our findings indicate that human activities have a greater impact on the quantitative degradation of ecosystems, while climate change has a greater impact on the quality degradation of ecosystems. Specifically, the forestry output value has a significant negative impact on the area of farmland and grassland ecosystems, while rural per capita net income and fishery output value have a significant negative impact on water area. Annual precipitation and annual average temperature have a significant positive effect on the quality of ecosystems in the good-quality level, while ecosystems in the low-quality level are mainly influenced by annual evaporation. Our results provide valuable insights for policymakers seeking to restore and manage ecosystems effectively in order to promote regional sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Mengyuan Zhang & Shuaipeng Chen & Wenping Liu, 2023. "Disentangling the Complexity of Regional Ecosystem Degradation: Uncovering the Interconnected Natural-Social Drivers of Quantity and Quality Loss," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:7:p:1280-:d:1177950
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/7/1280/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/7/1280/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brendan Choat & Timothy J. Brodribb & Craig R. Brodersen & Remko A. Duursma & Rosana López & Belinda E. Medlyn, 2018. "Triggers of tree mortality under drought," Nature, Nature, vol. 558(7711), pages 531-539, June.
    2. Rabbat, Christelle & Awad, Sary & Villot, Audrey & Rollet, Delphine & Andrès, Yves, 2022. "Sustainability of biomass-based insulation materials in buildings: Current status in France, end-of-life projections and energy recovery potentials," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    3. Warren-Rhodes, Kimberley & Koenig, Albert, 2001. "Ecosystem appropriation by Hong Kong and its implications for sustainable development," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 347-359, December.
    4. Kevin Parris, 2011. "Impact of Agriculture on Water Pollution in OECD Countries: Recent Trends and Future Prospects," International Journal of Water Resources Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 33-52, March.
    5. Qiong Jia & Mengfei Li & Xuecheng Dou, 2022. "Climate Change Affects Crop Production Potential in Semi-Arid Regions: A Case Study in Dingxi, Northwest China, in Recent 30 Years," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-12, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amon-Armah, Frederick & Yiridoe, Emmanuel K. & Hebb, Dale & Jamieson, Rob, 2013. "Nitrogen abatement cost comparison for cropping systems under alternative management choices," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 149915, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Claudio O. Delang & Ho Cheuk Lung, 2010. "Public Housing and Poverty Concentration in Urban Neighbourhoods: The Case of Hong Kong in the 1990s," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(7), pages 1391-1413, June.
    3. David A. Keiser & Joseph S. Shapiro, 2019. "US Water Pollution Regulation over the Past Half Century: Burning Waters to Crystal Springs?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 33(4), pages 51-75, Fall.
    4. Abraham Nathan Zoure & Paolo Vincenzo Genovese, 2023. "Comparative Study of the Impact of Bio-Sourced and Recycled Insulation Materials on Energy Efficiency in Office Buildings in Burkina Faso," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-26, January.
    5. Jennie Moore, 2015. "Ecological Footprints and Lifestyle Archetypes: Exploring Dimensions of Consumption and the Transformation Needed to Achieve Urban Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-17, April.
    6. Li-Tao Yang & Jun-Fang Zhao & Xiang-Ping Jiang & Sheng Wang & Lin-Hui Li & Hong-Fei Xie, 2022. "Effects of Climate Change on the Climatic Production Potential of Potatoes in Inner Mongolia, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-16, June.
    7. Kissinger, Meidad & Rees, William E., 2010. "An interregional ecological approach for modelling sustainability in a globalizing world—Reviewing existing approaches and emerging directions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(21), pages 2615-2623.
    8. Tshering Choden & Bhim Bahadur Ghaley, 2021. "A Portfolio of Effective Water and Soil Conservation Practices for Arable Production Systems in Europe and North Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, March.
    9. Dang, Hongzhong & Han, Hui & Chen, Shuai & Li, Mingyang, 2021. "A fragile soil moisture environment exacerbates the climate change-related impacts on the water use by Mongolian Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica) in northern China: Long-term observations," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    10. Chandio, Abbas Ali & Ozdemir, Dicle & Jiang, Yuansheng, 2023. "Modelling the impact of climate change and advanced agricultural technologies on grain output: Recent evidence from China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 485(C).
    11. Caroline Petit & Audrey Vincent & Philippe Fleury & Amandine Durpoix & Fabienne Barataud, 2016. "Protecting Water from Agricultural Diffuse Pollutions: Between Action Territories and Hydrogeological Demarcation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(1), pages 295-313, January.
    12. Browne, David & O'Regan, Bernadette & Moles, Richard, 2012. "Comparison of energy flow accounting, energy flow metabolism ratio analysis and ecological footprinting as tools for measuring urban sustainability: A case-study of an Irish city-region," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 97-107.
    13. Ye-Ning Wang & Qiang Zhou & Hao-Wei Wang, 2020. "Assessing Ecological Carrying Capacity in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Based on a Three-Dimensional Ecological Footprint Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.
    14. Alina Galimshina & Maliki Moustapha & Alexander Hollberg & Sébastien Lasvaux & Bruno Sudret & Guillaume Habert, 2024. "Strategies for robust renovation of residential buildings in Switzerland," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    15. Fayaz A. Lone & Showkat A. Ganaie & M. Imran Ganaie & Javeed A. Rather & Jahangeer A. Parry, 2022. "Is paddy cultivation in Kashmir Valley still a profitable activity? Geo-economic analysis across physiographic divisions," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(8), pages 1-18, August.
    16. Giordano, P. & Caputo, P. & Vancheri, A., 2014. "Fuzzy evaluation of heterogeneous quantities: Measuring urban ecological efficiency," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 288(C), pages 112-126.
    17. Donna L. Fitzgerald & Stefan Peters & Gregory R. Guerin & Andrew McGrath & Gunnar Keppel, 2023. "Quantifying Dieback in a Vulnerable Population of Eucalyptus macrorhyncha Using Remote Sensing," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, June.
    18. Xianliang Zhang & Tim Rademacher & Hongyan Liu & Lu Wang & Rubén D. Manzanedo, 2023. "Fading regulation of diurnal temperature ranges on drought-induced growth loss for drought-tolerant tree species," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    19. Zeqir Veselaj & Shahin Berisha, 2022. "Ecological footprint as a tool for change of individual attitudes toward the environment and better education for sustainability," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 30(1), pages 727-741, April.
    20. Dashnor Hoxha & Brahim Ismail & Ancuța Rotaru & David Izabel & Thibaut Renaux, 2022. "Assessment of the Usability of Some Bio-Based Insulation Materials in Double-Skin Steel Envelopes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-28, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:7:p:1280-:d:1177950. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.