IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i11p2085-d1284002.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Renewal of the Finnish Planning Legislation as a Strategy of Urban Planning and Development

Author

Listed:
  • Liisa Horelli

    (Department of the Built Environment, Aalto University, P.O. Box 14100, 02150 Aalto, Finland)

  • Sirkku Wallin

    (Department of the Built Environment, Aalto University, P.O. Box 14100, 02150 Aalto, Finland)

Abstract

Due to global eco-social and technological challenges, a new strategy of planning adopted as the Land Use and Building Act in Finland (2000) will be renewed after 23 years of implementation. Will the forthcoming law recognise the complex relationships and consequences of self-organised processes, the digital empowerment of citizens, and the eco-social content of planning and development? This article examines and discusses the renewal of the Finnish Land Use and Building Act and the forthcoming planning system from an ontological perspective. Methodologically it is based on an assessment of the draft of and comments on the new Act, as well as on a comparative analysis of two case studies that illustrate the potential consequences of the renewal in the Finnish context. The results reveal that the planning system will become more complex. Despite the adoption of a new digital methodology, the Act ignores civil society’s self-organisation and digital empowerment; also, the definition of the eco-social substance is vague. However, the Finnish reform serves as an example of the difficulties that planning systems encounter in the current context of complex problems concerning sustainability transitions all over the world.

Suggested Citation

  • Liisa Horelli & Sirkku Wallin, 2023. "The Renewal of the Finnish Planning Legislation as a Strategy of Urban Planning and Development," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:11:p:2085-:d:1284002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/11/2085/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/11/2085/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vincent Nadin & Dominic Stead & Marcin Dąbrowski & Ana Maria Fernandez-Maldonado, 2021. "Integrated, adaptive and participatory spatial planning: trends across Europe," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(5), pages 791-803, May.
    2. Joerges, Bernward, 1999. "Do Politics have Artefacts," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 29(3), pages 411-431.
    3. Rob Kitchin & Gareth W. Young & Oliver Dawkins, 2021. "Planning and 3D Spatial Media: Progress, Prospects, and the Knowledge and Experiences of Local Government Planners in Ireland," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 349-367, May.
    4. Augusto Pimentel PEREIRA & Mario PROCOPIUCK, 2022. "A Socio-Technical Perspective On The Future Of City Information Modelling," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(2), pages 66-88, May.
    5. Stefano Cozzolino, 2020. "The (anti) adaptive neighbourhoods. Embracing complexity and distribution of design control in the ordinary built environment," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(2), pages 203-219, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ian Carter & Stefano Moroni, 2022. "Adaptive and anti-adaptive neighbourhoods: Investigating the relationship between individual choice and systemic adaptability," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(2), pages 722-736, February.
    2. Tsahor, Michal & Katoshevski-Cavari, Rachel & Alfasi, Nurit, 2023. "Assessing urban adaptability: The key is in the land use plan," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    3. Potthast, Jörg, 2001. "Wenn Riesen tanzen lernen: Großflughäfen und Flexibilisierung aus wartungssoziologischer Perspektive," Discussion Papers, Research Group Metropolitan City Studies FS II 01-501, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    4. Cozzolino, Stefano & Moroni, Stefano, 2021. "Multiple agents and self-organisation in complex cities: The crucial role of several property," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    5. Ivana Suboticki & Knut H. Sørensen, 2021. "Designing and domesticating an interstructure: Exploring the practices and the politics of an elevator for cyclists," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(6), pages 1229-1244, May.
    6. Magennis Eoin & Corrigan Jordana & Blair Neale & Broin Deiric Ó, 2021. "Planning a Dublin–Belfast Economic Corridor: Networks, engagement and creating opportunities," Administration, Sciendo, vol. 69(4), pages 57-82, December.
    7. Selina Abraham, 2023. "Your Sustainability Is Not My Sustainability: In-between Spaces for Meaningful Collaboration between Local Stakeholders and Planning Professionals to Construct Congruent Frames over Contested Meanings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-21, September.
    8. Ward Rauws & Stefano Cozzolino & Stefano Moroni, 2020. "Framework rules for self-organizing cities: Introduction," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(2), pages 195-202, February.
    9. Peter Brokking & Ulla Mörtberg & Berit Balfors, 2021. "Municipal Practices for Integrated Planning of Nature-Based Solutions in Urban Development in the Stockholm Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-20, September.
    10. David Adade & Walter Timo de Vries, 2023. "Digital Twin for Active Stakeholder Participation in Land-Use Planning," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, February.
    11. Ana Tarrafa Silva & Ana Pereira Roders & Teresa Cunha Ferreira & Ivan Nevzgodin, 2023. "Critical Analysis of Policy Integration Degrees between Heritage Conservation and Spatial Planning in Amsterdam and Ballarat," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, May.
    12. Maciej Nowak & Giancarlo Cotella & Przemysław Śleszyński, 2021. "The Legal, Administrative, and Governance Frameworks of Spatial Policy, Planning, and Land Use: Interdependencies, Barriers, and Directions of Change," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-9, October.
    13. Eda Ustaoglu & Brendan Williams, 2022. "Institutional Settings and Effects on Agricultural Land Conversion: A Global and Spatial Analysis of European Regions," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-35, December.
    14. James Porter & David Demeritt, 2012. "Flood-Risk Management, Mapping, and Planning: The Institutional Politics of Decision Support in England," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(10), pages 2359-2378, October.
    15. Kerschner, Christian & Ehlers, Melf-Hinrich, 2016. "A framework of attitudes towards technology in theory and practice," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 139-151.
    16. Joanna M. McMillan & Joern Birkmann & Siwaporn Tangwanichagapong & Ali Jamshed, 2022. "Spatial Planning and Systems Thinking Tools for Climate Risk Reduction: A Case Study of the Andaman Coast, Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-23, June.
    17. Fatimah, Yuti Ariani & Raven, Rob P.J.M. & Arora, Saurabh, 2015. "Scripts in transition: Protective spaces of Indonesian biofuel villages," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 1-13.
    18. Mascha Gugganig & Karly Ann Burch & Julie Guthman & Kelly Bronson, 2023. "Contested agri-food futures: Introduction to the Special Issue," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(3), pages 787-798, September.
    19. Slaev, Aleksandar D., 2022. "Matching the degree of privateness/collectiveness to the scale of resource use," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    20. Thibaud Chassin & Jens Ingensand & Florent Joerin, 2023. "Media Coverage of 3D Visual Tools Used in Urban Participatory Planning," International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), IGI Global, vol. 12(1), pages 1-32, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:11:p:2085-:d:1284002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.