IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i6p906-d838478.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Framework for Comparative Assessment of Indigenous Land Governance

Author

Listed:
  • Chris McDonald

    (First Nations Portfolio, Australia National University, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia)

  • Lorena Figueiredo

    (Law School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 01005-010, SP, Brazil)

Abstract

Indigenous peoples are increasingly important players in the management and use of land and natural landscapes, bound in spiritual and traditional practices that endure and pre-date colonisation. This also extends to the aspirations that Indigenous traditional owners may have to generate income from land and to sustain business and employment opportunities that enable reinvestment in local communities. The paper draws from a study undertaken while the authors were at the Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) that involved 13 countries. It presents a framework to compare Indigenous land governance, to activate economic development opportunities across different legal and institutional contexts. The three-part typology allows us to assess the level of autonomy granted to Indigenous groups by law and identify key governance and regulatory instruments that they can employ to protect their cultural practices and activate commercial potential from land and waters. Varying autonomy levels can co-exist within a same country, since Indigenous groups may have different rights, aspirations, and capabilities. The typology allows us to conduct comparative analyses around progress and learnings that can support the self-determination of Indigenous peoples and promote regional well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Chris McDonald & Lorena Figueiredo, 2022. "A Framework for Comparative Assessment of Indigenous Land Governance," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:6:p:906-:d:838478
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/6/906/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/6/906/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David O'BRIEN & John Phillips & Valeri Patsiorkovsky, 2005. "Linking indigenous bonding and bridging social capital," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(8), pages 1041-1051.
    2. Chris McDonald & Lisanne Raderschall, 2019. "Indigenous community capacity and multi-level governance," OECD Regional Development Working Papers 2019/04, OECD Publishing.
    3. Altman, Jon C., 2004. "Economic development and Indigenous Australia: contestations over property, institutions and ideology," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 48(3), pages 1-22.
    4. Monica Brezzi & Lewis Dijkstra & Vicente Ruiz, 2011. "OECD Extended Regional Typology: The Economic Performance of Remote Rural Regions," OECD Regional Development Working Papers 2011/6, OECD Publishing.
    5. Lorena Figueiredo & Chris McDonald, 2019. "Making land management work for Indigenous economic development," OECD Regional Development Working Papers 2019/02, OECD Publishing.
    6. Jon C. Altman, 2004. "Economic development and Indigenous Australia: contestations over property, institutions and ideology," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 48(3), pages 513-534, September.
    7. Rodney Nelson, 2019. "Beyond Dependency: Economic Development, Capacity Building, and Generational Sustainability for Indigenous People in Canada," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(3), pages 21582440198, September.
    8. Vicente Ruiz & Lewis Dijkstra, 2011. "Refinement of the OECD regional typology: Economic Performance of Remote Rural Regions," ERSA conference papers ersa10p1650, European Regional Science Association.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tamara Krawchenko & John Tomaney, 2023. "The Governance of Land Use: A Conceptual Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-11, March.
    2. J. Kawika Riley & Cade Akamu & Lorinda Riley, 2022. "Ēwe Hānau o ka ʻĀina: A Policy Review Focused on Hawaiʻi’s Public Land Trust," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chris McDonald & Ana I. Moreno-Monroy & Laura-Sofia Springare, 2019. "Indigenous economic development and well-being in a place-based context," OECD Regional Development Working Papers 2019/01, OECD Publishing.
    2. Francisco José Goerlich Gisbert & Isidro Cantarino Martí, 2013. "Redefiniendo ciudades," Working Papers. Serie EC 2013-06, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    3. Tisdell, Clement A., 2005. "Resource Entitlements of Indigenous Minorities, Their Poverty and Conservation of Nature: Status of Australian Aborigines, Comparisons with India's Tribals, Theory and Changing Policies Globally," Economics, Ecology and Environment Working Papers 55061, University of Queensland, School of Economics.
    4. Venn, Tyron, 2005. "Commercial Forestry: An Economic Development Opportunity Consistent with the Property Rights of the Wik People to Natural Resources," Risk and Sustainable Management Group Working Papers 149845, University of Queensland, School of Economics.
    5. Mieczysław Adamowicz, 2021. "The Potential for Innovative and Smart Rural Development in the Peripheral Regions of Eastern Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-28, February.
    6. Monika Stanny & Łukasz Komorowski & Andrzej Rosner, 2021. "The Socio-Economic Heterogeneity of Rural Areas: Towards a Rural Typology of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
    7. Paolo Veneri & Vicente Ruiz, 2016. "Urban-To-Rural Population Growth Linkages: Evidence From Oecd Tl3 Regions," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(1), pages 3-24, January.
    8. Jon Altman & Geoff Buchanan, 2006. "Measuring the ‘real’ indigenous economy in remote Australia using NATSISS 2002," Australian Journal of Labour Economics (AJLE), Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre (BCEC), Curtin Business School, vol. 9(1), pages 17-32, March.
    9. Alexandra Langford & Geoffrey Lawrence & Kiah Smith, 2021. "Financialization for Development? Asset Making on Indigenous Land in Remote Northern Australia," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 52(3), pages 574-597, May.
    10. Patrícia C. Melo & Conceição Rego & Paulo R. Anciães & Nuno Guiomar & José Muñoz‐Rojas, 2022. "Does road accessibility to cities support rural population growth? Evidence for Portugal between 1991 and 2011," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(2), pages 443-470, March.
    11. Venn, Tyron J. & Quiggin, John, 2007. "Accommodating indigenous cultural heritage values in resource assessment: Cape York Peninsula and the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2-3), pages 334-344, March.
    12. Klimanek Tomasz & Filas-Przybył Sylwia, 2019. "The Impact Of The Applied Typology On The Statistical Picture Of Population Ageing In Urban Areas In Poland – A Comparative Analysis," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 20(4), pages 135-152, December.
    13. Braga Gustavo Bastos & de Carvalho Fiúza Ana Louise & Remoaldo Paula Cristina, 2018. "Eurostat methodology applied to the characterization of rural and urban Brazilian spaces," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 42(42), pages 151-162, December.
    14. Carmen Delgado-Viñas & María-Luisa Gómez-Moreno, 2022. "The Interaction between Urban and Rural Areas: An Updated Paradigmatic, Methodological and Bibliographic Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, August.
    15. Francesco Mantino & Giovanna De Fano & Gianluca Asaro, 2022. "Analysing the Policy Delivery System and Effects on Territorial Disparities in Italy: The Mechanisms of Territorial Targeting in the EU Rural Development Programmes 2014–2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-20, October.
    16. Venn, Tyron J., 2007. "Economic implications of inalienable and communal native title: The case of Wik forestry in Australia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 131-142, October.
    17. Julian Gorman & Diane Pearson & Penelope Wurm, 2020. "Old Ways, New Ways—Scaling Up from Customary Use of Plant Products to Commercial Harvest Taking a Multifunctional, Landscape Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-20, May.
    18. Martin Falk & Eva Hagsten & Xiang Lin, 2023. "Uneven domestic tourism demand in times of pandemic," Tourism Economics, , vol. 29(3), pages 596-611, May.
    19. Ognjen Žurovec & Sabrija Čadro & Bishal Kumar Sitaula, 2017. "Quantitative Assessment of Vulnerability to Climate Change in Rural Municipalities of Bosnia and Herzegovina," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-18, July.
    20. Wilman, Elizabeth A., 2013. "An economic model of aboriginal fire-stick farming," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 59(1), March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:6:p:906-:d:838478. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.