IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i2p257-d744810.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regional Disparities and Influencing Factors of Eco-Efficiency of Arable Land Utilization in China

Author

Listed:
  • Nan Ke

    (College of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Xupeng Zhang

    (School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Xinhai Lu

    (College of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Bing Kuang

    (School of Public Administration, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Bin Jiang

    (College of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

Abstract

Eco-efficiency of arable land utilization (EALU) emphasizes efficient coordination between land use systems and ecosystems. It is therefore of great significance for agricultural sustainability based on the systematic assessment of EALU. This study took carbon emissions and non-point source pollution resulting from arable land utilization into the measurement system of EALU, and a super-SBM model, kernel density estimation and Tobit regression model were used to analyze regional differences and influencing factors of EALU for 31 provinces in China from 2000 to 2019. The results showed that there was an upward trend in EALU in China from 0.4393 in 2000 to 0.8929 in 2019, with an average annual growth rate of 4.01%. At the regional level, the EALU of three categories of grain functional areas generally maintains an increasing trend, with the highest average value of EALU in main grain marketing areas (MGMAs), followed by grain producing and marketing balance areas (GPMBAs) and main grain producing areas (MGPAs). There are obvious differences in EALU among provinces, and the number of provinces with high eco-efficiency has increased significantly, showing a spatial distribution pattern of “block” clustering. In terms of dynamic evolution, kernel density curves reflect the evolution of EALU in China and grain functional areas with different degrees of polarization characteristics. The results of Tobit regression show that natural conditions, financial support for agriculture, science and technology inputs, level of industrialization, agricultural mechanization, and the living standards of farmers are significant factors resulting in regional disparities of EALU. Therefore, this study proposes the implementation of differentiated arable land use/agricultural management strategies to improve the sustainable utilization of arable land.

Suggested Citation

  • Nan Ke & Xupeng Zhang & Xinhai Lu & Bing Kuang & Bin Jiang, 2022. "Regional Disparities and Influencing Factors of Eco-Efficiency of Arable Land Utilization in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:2:p:257-:d:744810
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/2/257/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/2/257/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ma, Li & Long, Hualou & Tu, Shuangshuang & Zhang, Yingnan & Zheng, Yuhan, 2020. "Farmland transition in China and its policy implications," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    2. Xie, Hualin & Chen, Qianru & Wang, Wei & He, Yafen, 2018. "Analyzing the green efficiency of arable land use in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 15-28.
    3. Abass, Kabila & Adanu, Selase Kofi & Agyemang, Seth, 2018. "Peri-urbanisation and loss of arable land in Kumasi Metropolis in three decades: Evidence from remote sensing image analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 470-479.
    4. Berihun, Mulatu Liyew & Tsunekawa, Atsushi & Haregeweyn, Nigussie & Meshesha, Derege Tsegaye & Adgo, Enyew & Tsubo, Mitsuru & Masunaga, Tsugiyuki & Fenta, Ayele Almaw & Sultan, Dagnenet & Yibeltal, Me, 2019. "Exploring land use/land cover changes, drivers and their implications in contrasting agro-ecological environments of Ethiopia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    5. Ying Chen & Suran Li & Long Cheng, 2020. "Evaluation of Cultivated Land Use Efficiency with Environmental Constraints in the Dongting Lake Eco-Economic Zone of Hunan Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-15, November.
    6. Lu, Hua & Xie, Hualin & Lv, Tiangui & Yao, Guanrong, 2019. "Determinants of cultivated land recuperation in ecologically damaged areas in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 160-166.
    7. Chaozheng Zhang & Yangyue Su & Gangqiao Yang & Danling Chen & Rongxuan Yang, 2020. "Spatial-Temporal Characteristics of Cultivated Land Use Efficiency in Major Function-Oriented Zones: A Case Study of Zhejiang Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-20, April.
    8. Kuang, Bing & Lu, Xinhai & Zhou, Min & Chen, Danling, 2020. "Provincial cultivated land use efficiency in China: Empirical analysis based on the SBM-DEA model with carbon emissions considered," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    9. Babin, N. & Mullendore, N.D. & Prokopy, L.S., 2016. "Using social criteria to select watersheds for non-point source agricultural pollution abatement projects," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 327-333.
    10. Ye, Sijing & Song, Changqing & Shen, Shi & Gao, Peichao & Cheng, Changxiu & Cheng, Feng & Wan, Changjun & Zhu, Dehai, 2020. "Spatial pattern of arable land-use intensity in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    11. Mukuve, Feriha Mugisha & Fenner, Richard A., 2015. "The influence of water, land, energy and soil-nutrient resource interactions on the food system in Uganda," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 24-37.
    12. Skevas, Theodoros & Stefanou, Spiro E. & Oude Lansink, Alfons, 2014. "Pesticide use, environmental spillovers and efficiency: A DEA risk-adjusted efficiency approach applied to Dutch arable farming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(2), pages 658-664.
    13. Tone, Kaoru, 2002. "A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 32-41, November.
    14. Xie, Jinhua & Yang, Gangqiao & Wang, Ge & Song, Yan & Yang, Fan, 2021. "How do different rural-land-consolidation modes shape farmers’ ecological production behaviors?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    15. Tone, Kaoru, 2001. "A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(3), pages 498-509, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuling Wu & Pei Zhang & Jia Li & Jiao Hou, 2022. "Spatial Distribution Evolution and Optimization Path of Eco-Efficiency of Cultivated Land Use: A Case Study of Hubei Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Shuting Liu & Junsong Jia & Hanzhi Huang & Dilan Chen & Yexi Zhong & Yangming Zhou, 2023. "China’s CO 2 Emissions: A Thorough Analysis of Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Sustainable Policy from the Agricultural Land-Use Perspective during 1995–2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Mengna Li & Li Tan & Xi Yang, 2023. "The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Cultivated Land Use Eco-Efficiency: Evidence from China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, August.
    4. Min Zhou & Hua Zhang & Nan Ke, 2022. "Cultivated Land Transfer, Management Scale, and Cultivated Land Green Utilization Efficiency in China: Based on Intermediary and Threshold Models," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Min Zhou & Hua Zhang & Zixuan Zhang & Hanxiaoxue Sun, 2023. "Digital Financial Inclusion, Cultivated Land Transfer and Cultivated Land Green Utilization Efficiency: An Empirical Study from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    6. Mingtao Yan & Jianji Zhao & Jiajun Qiao & Dong Han & Qiankun Zhu & Yang Yang & Qi Liu & Zhipeng Wang, 2023. "Spatial Pattern Evolution and Influencing Factors on Agricultural Non-Point Source Pollution in Small Town Areas under the Background of Rapid Industrialization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-19, February.
    7. Min Zhou & Bing Kuang & Min Zhou & Nan Ke, 2022. "The Spatial and Temporal Evolution of the Coordination Degree in Regard to Farmland Transfer and Cultivated Land Green Utilization Efficiency in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-16, August.
    8. Min Zhou & Hanxiaoxue Sun & Nan Ke, 2022. "The Spatial and Temporal Evolution of Coordination Degree Concerning China’s Cultivated Land Green Utilization Efficiency and High-Quality Agricultural Development," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
    9. Jie Li & Zhengchuan Sun & Jie Zhou & Yaya Sow & Xufeng Cui & Haipeng Chen & Qianling Shen, 2023. "The Impact of the Digital Economy on Carbon Emissions from Cultivated Land Use," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, March.
    10. Yajuan Wang & Xi Wu & Hongbo Zhu, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Pattern and Spatial Disequilibrium of Cultivated Land Use Efficiency in China: An Empirical Study Based on 342 Prefecture-Level Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, October.
    11. Houtian Tang & Yuanlai Wu & Jinxiu Chen & Liuxin Deng & Minjie Zeng, 2022. "How Does Change in Rural Residential Land Affect Cultivated Land Use Efficiency? An Empirical Study Based on 42 Cities in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guangyan Ran & Guangyao Wang & Huijuan Du & Mi Lv, 2023. "Relationship of Cooperative Management and Green and Low-Carbon Transition of Agriculture and Its Impacts: A Case Study of the Western Tarim River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Mengchao Yao & Yihua Zhang, 2021. "Evaluation and Optimization of Urban Land-Use Efficiency: A Case Study in Sichuan Province of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    3. Yi Qu & Xiao Lyu & Wenlong Peng & Zongfei Xin, 2021. "How to Evaluate the Green Utilization Efficiency of Cultivated Land in a Farming Household? A Case Study of Shandong Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Yuling Wu & Pei Zhang & Jia Li & Jiao Hou, 2022. "Spatial Distribution Evolution and Optimization Path of Eco-Efficiency of Cultivated Land Use: A Case Study of Hubei Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Yuanhe Yu & Jinkuo Lin & Peixiang Zhou & Shuwei Zheng & Zijun Li, 2022. "Cultivated Land Input Behavior of Different Types of Rural Households and Its Impact on Cultivated Land-Use Efficiency: A Case Study of the Yimeng Mountain Area, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-21, November.
    6. Pengnan Xiao & Jie Xu & Zupeng Yu & Peng Qian & Mengyao Lu & Chao Ma, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Pattern Differentiation and Influencing Factors of Cultivated Land Use Efficiency in Hubei Province under Carbon Emission Constraints," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-24, June.
    7. Mengna Li & Li Tan & Xi Yang, 2023. "The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Cultivated Land Use Eco-Efficiency: Evidence from China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Ning Geng & Zengjin Liu & Xuejiao Wang & Lin Meng & Jiayan Pan, 2022. "Measurement of Green Total Factor Productivity and Its Spatial Convergence Test on the Pig-Breeding Industry in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    9. Xiao Lu & Yi Qu & Piling Sun & Wei Yu & Wenlong Peng, 2020. "Green Transition of Cultivated Land Use in the Yellow River Basin: A Perspective of Green Utilization Efficiency Evaluation," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-22, November.
    10. Bampatsou, Christina & Halkos, George, 2019. "Economic growth, efficiency and environmental elasticity for the G7 countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 355-360.
    11. Yahong Liu & Hailian Sun & Lei Shi & Huimin Wang & Zhai Xiu & Xiao Qiu & Hong Chang & Yu Xie & Yang Wang & Chengjie Wang, 2021. "Spatial-Temporal Changes and Driving Factors of Land-Use Eco-Efficiency Incorporating Ecosystem Services in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, January.
    12. Yayuan Pang & Xinjun Wang, 2020. "Land-Use Efficiency in Shandong (China): Empirical Analysis Based on a Super-SBM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-20, December.
    13. Chaozheng Zhang & Yangyue Su & Gangqiao Yang & Danling Chen & Rongxuan Yang, 2020. "Spatial-Temporal Characteristics of Cultivated Land Use Efficiency in Major Function-Oriented Zones: A Case Study of Zhejiang Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-20, April.
    14. Zhongxun Zhang & Kaifang Shi & Zhiyong Zhu & Lu Tang & Kangchuan Su & Qingyuan Yang, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of the Rural Natural Capital Utilization Efficiency: A Case Study of Chongqing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-29, May.
    15. Min Zhou & Hua Zhang & Zixuan Zhang & Hanxiaoxue Sun, 2023. "Digital Financial Inclusion, Cultivated Land Transfer and Cultivated Land Green Utilization Efficiency: An Empirical Study from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    16. Lan Yao & Zhenning Yu & Mengya Wu & Jiachen Ning & Tiangui Lv, 2020. "The Spatiotemporal Evolution and Trend Prediction of Ecological Wellbeing Performance in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, December.
    17. Houtian Tang & Yuanlai Wu & Jinxiu Chen & Liuxin Deng & Minjie Zeng, 2022. "How Does Change in Rural Residential Land Affect Cultivated Land Use Efficiency? An Empirical Study Based on 42 Cities in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.
    18. Jie Zhang & Yajing Wang & Jiangfeng Li, 2023. "Maximize Eco-Economic Benefits with Minimum Land Resources Input: Evaluation and Evolution of Land Use Eco-Efficiency of Agglomerations in Middle Reaches of Yangtze River, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-19, January.
    19. Ying Chen & Suran Li & Long Cheng, 2020. "Evaluation of Cultivated Land Use Efficiency with Environmental Constraints in the Dongting Lake Eco-Economic Zone of Hunan Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-15, November.
    20. Binkai Xu & Yanming Sun, 2023. "The Impact of Industrial Agglomeration on Urban Land Green Use Efficiency and Its Spatio-Temporal Pattern: Evidence from 283 Cities in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-19, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:2:p:257-:d:744810. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.