IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i12p2196-d992922.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identification of Land Use Conflicts in Shandong Province from an Ecological Security Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Guanglong Dong

    (School of Management Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China)

  • Zhonghao Liu

    (School of Management Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China)

  • Yuanzhao Niu

    (Binhu New District Construction and Development Center in Xintai, Taian 271200, China)

  • Wenya Jiang

    (Zhuhai Nature Resource and Planning Technology Center, Zhuhai 519000, China)

Abstract

Accurate identification of land use conflicts is an important prerequisite for the rational allocation of land resources and optimizing the production–living–ecological space pattern. Previous studies used suitability assessment and landscape pattern indices to identify land use conflicts. However, research on land use conflict identification from the perspective of ecological security is insufficient and not conducive to regional ecological, environmental protection, and sustainable development. Based on ecological security, this study takes Shandong Province as an example and comprehensively evaluates the importance of ecosystem service function and environmental sensitivity. It identifies the ecological source, and extracts ecological corridors with a minimum cumulative resistance model from which ecological security patterns are constructed. It identifies land use conflicts through spatial overlay analysis of arable land and construction land. The results show that: (1) Shandong Province has formed an ecological security pattern of “two ecological barriers, two belts, and eight cores” with an area of 15,987 km 2 . (2) The level of arable land–ecological space conflict is low, at 39.76%. The proportions of serious and moderate conflicts are 13.44% and 26.97%, respectively, distributed primarily on the Jiaodong Peninsula and the low hill areas of Ludong. (3) Construction land–ecological space conflict is reasonably stable and controllable, at 76.39%, occurring mainly around urban construction land, with serious and moderate conflict concentrated in the eastern coastal areas, mainly between rural settlements and ecologically safe space in the region. This study has important theoretical and practical reference values for identifying land use conflicts, protecting regional ecological security, and optimizing land use patterns.

Suggested Citation

  • Guanglong Dong & Zhonghao Liu & Yuanzhao Niu & Wenya Jiang, 2022. "Identification of Land Use Conflicts in Shandong Province from an Ecological Security Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:12:p:2196-:d:992922
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/12/2196/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/12/2196/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Feng & Ye, Yaping & Song, Bowen & Wang, Rusong, 2015. "Evaluation of urban suitable ecological land based on the minimum cumulative resistance model: A case study from Changzhou, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 318(C), pages 194-203.
    2. Jing Zhang & Yan Chen & Congmou Zhu & Bingbing Huang & Muye Gan, 2021. "Identification of Potential Land-Use Conflicts between Agricultural and Ecological Space in an Ecologically Fragile Area of Southeastern China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Yang Yang & Yanru Zhou & Zhe Feng & Kening Wu, 2022. "Making the Case for Parks: Construction of an Ecological Network of Urban Parks Based on Birds," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Guanglong Dong & Yibing Ge & Haiwei Jia & Chuanzhun Sun & Senyuan Pan, 2021. "Land Use Multi-Suitability, Land Resource Scarcity and Diversity of Human Needs: A New Framework for Land Use Conflict Identification," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-14, September.
    5. Oana-Cătălina Popescu & Antonio-Valentin Tache & Alexandru-Ionuț Petrișor, 2022. "Methodology for Identifying Ecological Corridors: A Spatial Planning Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-25, July.
    6. Jiang, Song & Meng, Jijun & Zhu, Likai, 2020. "Spatial and temporal analyses of potential land use conflict under the constraints of water resources in the middle reaches of the Heihe River," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    7. Siqi Yi & Yong Zhou & Qing Li, 2022. "A New Perspective for Urban Development Boundary Delineation Based on the MCR Model and CA-Markov Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, March.
    8. Chuansheng Wang & Guiyan Sun & Lijuan Dang, 2015. "Identifying Ecological Red Lines: A Case Study of the Coast in Liaoning Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-17, July.
    9. Gao, Yuan & Wang, Jinman & Zhang, Min & Li, Sijia, 2021. "Measurement and prediction of land use conflict in an opencast mining area," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    10. Orr, Alastair & Mwale, Blessings, 2001. "Adapting to Adjustment: Smallholder Livelihood Strategies in Southern Malawi," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 29(8), pages 1325-1343, August.
    11. Gang Lin & Jingying Fu & Dong Jiang, 2021. "Production–Living–Ecological Conflict Identification Using a Multiscale Integration Model Based on Spatial Suitability Analysis and Sustainable Development Evaluation: A Case Study of Ningbo, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-13, April.
    12. Honglei Cui & Mei Liu & Chen Chen, 2022. "Ecological Restoration Strategies for the Topography of Loess Plateau Based on Adaptive Ecological Sensitivity Evaluation: A Case Study in Lanzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, March.
    13. Yu, Dandan & Han, Shijie, 2016. "Ecosystem service status and changes of degraded natural reserves – A study from the Changbai Mountain Natural Reserve, China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 56-65.
    14. Reuveny, Rafael & Maxwell, John W. & Davis, Jefferson, 2011. "On conflict over natural resources," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(4), pages 698-712, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Linlin Wang & Qiyuan Hu & Liming Liu & Chengcheng Yuan, 2022. "Land Use Multifunctions in Metropolis Fringe: Spatiotemporal Identification and Trade-Off Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Jiao Chen & Liwei Zhang & Shan Zhao & Hua Zong, 2023. "Assessing Land-Use Conflict Potential and Its Correlation with LULC Based on the Perspective of Multi-Functionality and Landscape Complexity: The Case of Chengdu, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Andreas Tolk & Jennifer A. Richkus & F. LeRon Shults & Wesley J. Wildman, 2023. "Computational Decision Support for Socio-Technical Awareness of Land-Use Planning under Complexity—A Dam Resilience Planning Case Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, April.
    4. Yanlong Guo & Pengyu Chen & Han Zhang & Zuoqing Jiang, 2022. "Evaluation of the Perception and Experience of Rural Natural Landscape among Youth Groups: An Empirical Analysis from Three Villages around Hefei," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-26, December.
    5. Shan Ke & Hui Pan & Bowen Jin, 2023. "Identification of Priority Areas for Ecological Restoration Based on Human Disturbance and Ecological Security Patterns: A Case Study of Fuzhou City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-26, February.
    6. Guanglong Dong & Jue Wang & Wenxin Zhang & Zheng Liu & Kehua Wang & Weiya Cheng, 2023. "Land Use Conflict Identification Coupled with Ecological Protection Priority in Jinan City, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-15, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tian Liang & Peng Du & Fei Yang & Yuanxia Su & Yinchen Luo & You Wu & Chuanhao Wen, 2022. "Potential Land-Use Conflicts in the Urban Center of Chongqing Based on the “Production–Living–Ecological Space” Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Guanglong Dong & Yibing Ge & Haiwei Jia & Chuanzhun Sun & Senyuan Pan, 2021. "Land Use Multi-Suitability, Land Resource Scarcity and Diversity of Human Needs: A New Framework for Land Use Conflict Identification," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-14, September.
    3. Yang Zheng & Linlin Cheng & Yifang Wang, 2022. "Measuring the Spatial Conflict of Resource-Based Cities and Its Coupling Coordination Relationship with Land Use," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, September.
    4. Gang Lin & Dong Jiang & Jingying Fu & Yi Zhao, 2022. "A Review on the Overall Optimization of Production–Living–Ecological Space: Theoretical Basis and Conceptual Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, February.
    5. Guanglong Dong & Jue Wang & Wenxin Zhang & Zheng Liu & Kehua Wang & Weiya Cheng, 2023. "Land Use Conflict Identification Coupled with Ecological Protection Priority in Jinan City, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-15, March.
    6. Yanru Zhao & Xiaomin Zhao & Xinyi Huang & Jiaxin Guo & Guohui Chen, 2022. "Identifying a Period of Spatial Land Use Conflicts and Their Driving Forces in the Pearl River Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Junxiong Mo & Piling Sun & Dandan Shen & Nan Li & Jinye Zhang & Kun Wang, 2023. "Simulation Analysis of Land-Use Spatial Conflict in a Geopark Based on the GMOP–Markov–PLUS Model: A Case Study of Yimengshan Geopark, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-24, June.
    8. Caihong Yang & Huijun Guo & Xiaoyuan Huang & Yanxia Wang & Xiaona Li & Xinyuan Cui, 2022. "Ecological Network Construction of a National Park Based on MSPA and MCR Models: An Example of the Proposed National Parks of “Ailaoshan-Wuliangshan” in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, October.
    9. Yan Sun & Xiaoping Ge & Junna Liu & Yuanyuan Chang & Gang-Jun Liu & Fu Chen, 2021. "Mitigating Spatial Conflict of Land Use for Sustainable Wetlands Landscape in Li-Xia-River Region of Central Jiangsu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-14, October.
    10. Zilang Cheng & Yanjun Zhang & Lingzhi Wang & Lanyi Wei & Xuying Wu, 2022. "An Analysis of Land-Use Conflict Potential Based on the Perspective of Production–Living–Ecological Function," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, May.
    11. Guanglong Dong & Wenxin Zhang & Xinliang Xu & Kun Jia, 2021. "Multi-Dimensional Feature Recognition and Policy Implications of Rural Human–Land Relationships in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    12. Jing Xie & Binggeng Xie & Kaichun Zhou & Junhan Li & Jianyong Xiao & Changchang Liu & Xuemao Zhang, 2023. "Multiple Probability Ecological Network and County-Scale Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, August.
    13. Guangliang Zhou & Di Zhang & Qian Zhou & Tao Shi, 2022. "Study on the Spatiotemporal Evolution Characteristics of the “Production–Living–Ecology” Space in the Yellow River Basin and Its Driving Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-26, November.
    14. Yanzhen Hou & Zhenlong Zhang & Yuerong Wang & Honghu Sun & Chang Xu, 2022. "Function Evaluation and Coordination Analysis of Production–Living–Ecological Space Based on the Perspective of Type–Intensity–Connection: A Case Study of Suzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-21, November.
    15. Jiao Chen & Liwei Zhang & Shan Zhao & Hua Zong, 2023. "Assessing Land-Use Conflict Potential and Its Correlation with LULC Based on the Perspective of Multi-Functionality and Landscape Complexity: The Case of Chengdu, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, March.
    16. Jing Zhang & Yan Chen & Congmou Zhu & Bingbing Huang & Muye Gan, 2021. "Identification of Potential Land-Use Conflicts between Agricultural and Ecological Space in an Ecologically Fragile Area of Southeastern China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, September.
    17. Houssa, Romain & Verpoorten, Marijke, 2015. "The Unintended Consequence of an Export Ban: Evidence from Benin’s Shrimp Sector," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 138-150.
    18. Changchun Feng & Hao Zhang & Liang Xiao & Yongpei Guo, 2022. "Land Use Change and Its Driving Factors in the Rural–Urban Fringe of Beijing: A Production–Living–Ecological Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, February.
    19. Wancong Li & Hong Li & Shijun Wang & Zhiqiang Feng, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Evolution of County-Level Land Use Structure in the Context of Urban Shrinkage: Evidence from Northeast China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, October.
    20. Bao Meng & Shaoyao Zhang & Wei Deng & Li Peng & Peng Zhou & Hao Zhang, 2023. "Identification and Analysis of Territorial Spatial Utilization Conflicts in Yibin Based on Multidimensional Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:12:p:2196-:d:992922. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.