IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i10p1818-d944755.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Climate Change Adaption between Governance and Government—Collaborative Arrangements in the City of Munich

Author

Listed:
  • Simone Linke

    (Energy Efficient and Sustainable Design and Building, Technical University Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany)

  • Sabrina Erlwein

    (Strategic Landscape Planning and Management, Technical University Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany)

  • Martina van Lierop

    (Strategic Landscape Planning and Management, Technical University Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany)

  • Elizaveta Fakirova

    (Strategic Landscape Planning and Management, Technical University Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany)

  • Stephan Pauleit

    (Strategic Landscape Planning and Management, Technical University Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany)

  • Werner Lang

    (Energy Efficient and Sustainable Design and Building, Technical University Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany)

Abstract

Growing cities face severe land use conflicts. Urban expansion and the densification of existing built areas are increasing the pressure on green spaces, which are key for climate change adaptation. Planning procedures embroiled in these land use conflicts are often complicated and slow. This is due to the increasing complexity in planning processes, which involve a multitude of stakeholders and decision-makers, whose responsibilities are not always entirely clear. Governance-oriented forms of decision making with horizontal structures are often required, but these also entail challenges. In our study, we ask how climate adaptation through urban green spaces can be integrated into planning processes. The study is based on a methodological combination, including document analysis and qualitative interviews with administrative staff. The City of Munich, a rapidly growing German city, serves as a case study. The results show different collaborative arrangements in four planning arenas and demonstrate how these structures support or hinder climate change adaptation mainstreaming. We conclude that hierarchical structures impede horizontal collaborative arrangements and shed lights on mechanisms reinforcing these structures. For large administrations, informal meetings and coordinating units are effective in fostering interdepartmental cooperation.

Suggested Citation

  • Simone Linke & Sabrina Erlwein & Martina van Lierop & Elizaveta Fakirova & Stephan Pauleit & Werner Lang, 2022. "Climate Change Adaption between Governance and Government—Collaborative Arrangements in the City of Munich," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:10:p:1818-:d:944755
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/10/1818/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/10/1818/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bernardo Bortolotti & Marcella Fantini & Carlo Scarpa, 2002. "Why Do Governments Privatize Abroad?," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 3(2), pages 131-161, June.
    2. anonymous, 2002. "New Board governors Bies and Olson sworn in to office," Federal Reserve Bulletin, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.), issue Jan, pages 1-15.
    3. Louis Meuleman, 2021. "Public Administration and Governance for the SDGs: Navigating between Change and Stability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, May.
    4. Alan Greenspan, 2002. "Corporate governance," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 3(03), pages 3-6, October.
    5. Julian Franks & Colin Mayer, 2002. "Governance as a source of managerial discipline," Working Paper Research 31, National Bank of Belgium.
    6. anonymous, 2002. "Resignation of Governor Laurence H. Meyer," Federal Reserve Bulletin, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.), issue Feb, pages 1-85.
    7. Marika Tomasi & Sara Favargiotti & Martina van Lierop & Lorenzo Giovannini & Andrea Zonato, 2021. "Verona Adapt. Modelling as a Planning Instrument: Applying a Climate-Responsive Approach in Verona, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-28, June.
    8. Sabrina Erlwein & Stephan Pauleit, 2021. "Trade-Offs between Urban Green Space and Densification: Balancing Outdoor Thermal Comfort, Mobility, and Housing Demand," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 5-19.
    9. Raymond W. Y. Kao & Kenneth R. Kao & Rowland R. Kao, 2002. "Should/Can the Government be Entrepreneurial?," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Entrepreneurism A Philosophy and A Sensible Alternative for the Market Economy, chapter 18, pages 390-411, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    10. Raymond W. Y. Kao & Kenneth R. Kao & Rowland R. Kao, 2002. "Corporate Governance, Responsibility and Profit," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Entrepreneurism A Philosophy and A Sensible Alternative for the Market Economy, chapter 16, pages 349-366, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    11. Jun Ma & Hana Polackova, 2002. "Monitoring Fiscal Risks of Subnational Governments," World Bank Publications - Reports 11355, The World Bank Group.
    12. Gunilla Lindholm, 2017. "The Implementation of Green Infrastructure: Relating a General Concept to Context and Site," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-13, April.
    13. anonymous, 2002. "Resignation of Board Governor Kelley," Federal Reserve Bulletin, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.), issue Jan, pages 1-15.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alberto Peralta & Luis Rubalcaba, 2021. "How Governance Paradigms and Other Drivers Affect Public Managers’ Use of Innovation Practices. A PLS-SEM Analysis and Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-28, May.
    2. Diana Panke, 2020. "Regional cooperation through the lenses of states: Why do states nurture regional integration?," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 475-504, April.
    3. Nikolić Jelena & Zlatanović Dejana, 2018. "Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Synergies: A Systemic Approach," Naše gospodarstvo/Our economy, Sciendo, vol. 64(3), pages 36-46, September.
    4. Istvan Rado & Mei-Fei Lu & I-Chen Lin & Ken Aoo, 2021. "Societal Entrepreneurship for Sustainable Asian Rural Societies: A Multi-Sectoral Social Capital Approach in Thailand, Taiwan, and Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-28, March.
    5. Stefan Greiving & Dietwald Gruehn & Christa Reicher, 2022. "The Rhenish Coal-Mining Area—Assessing the Transformational Talents and Challenges of a Region in Fundamental Structural Change," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, May.
    6. Andy Gouldson & Rory Sullivan, 2014. "Understanding the Governance of Corporations: An Examination of the Factors Shaping UK Supermarket Strategies on Climate Change," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(12), pages 2972-2990, December.
    7. Miriam Weismann & Christopher Buscaglia & Jason Peterson, 2014. "The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: Why It Fails to Deter Bribery as a Global Market Entry Strategy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 123(4), pages 591-619, September.
    8. Enrique Yacuzzi, 2005. "A primer on governance and performance in small and medium-sized enterprises," CEMA Working Papers: Serie Documentos de Trabajo. 293, Universidad del CEMA.
    9. Odeh Al-Jayyousi & Hira Amin & Hiba Ali Al-Saudi & Amjaad Aljassas & Evren Tok, 2023. "Mission-Oriented Innovation Policy for Sustainable Development: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-21, August.
    10. Björn Mestdagh & Olivier Sempiga & Luc Van Liedekerke, 2023. "The Impact of External Shocks on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Linking the COVID-19 Pandemic to SDG Implementation at the Local Government Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, April.
    11. Eggimann, Sven, 2022. "Expanding urban green space with superblocks," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    12. Chris Skelcher & Jacob Torfing, 2010. "Improving democratic governance through institutional design: Civic participation and democratic ownership in Europe," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(1), pages 71-91, March.
    13. Boubakri, Narjess & Cosset, Jean-Claude & Samet, Anis, 2010. "The choice of ADRs," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(9), pages 2077-2095, September.
    14. Francesco Ramella, 2010. "Negotiating Local Development: The Italian Experience of ‘Territorial Pacts’," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 28(3), pages 512-527, June.
    15. Mediaty & Nurleni & Muhammad Muflih Ramlan, 2016. "Analysis of the Implementation of Good Corporate Governance at PT Nusantara Infrastructure Tbk," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 8(2), pages 6-19.
    16. Ardielli Eva, 2019. "Use of TOPSIS Method for Assessing of Good Governance in European Union Countries," Review of Economic Perspectives, Sciendo, vol. 19(3), pages 211-231, September.
    17. Lena Ulbricht & Karen Yeung, 2022. "Algorithmic regulation: A maturing concept for investigating regulation of and through algorithms," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), pages 3-22, January.
    18. Schuster, Philipp & Schmitt, Carina & Traub, Stefan, 2013. "The retreat of the state from entrepreneurial activities: A convergence analysis for OECD countries, 1980–2007," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 95-112.
    19. Smith, Göran & Hensher, David A., 2020. "Towards a framework for Mobility-as-a-Service policies," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 54-65.
    20. Athaulla A Rasheed, 2020. "Framing Metagovernance in the Context of Developing Democracies: An Institutionalist Viewpoint," Journal of Public Administration and Governance, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(3), pages 91111-91111, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:10:p:1818-:d:944755. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.