IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i9p941-d630689.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Fractal Approach to Urban Boundary Delineation Based on Raster Land Use Maps: A Case of Shanghai, China

Author

Listed:
  • Chong Zhao

    (School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430000, China)

  • Yu Li

    (School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430000, China)

  • Min Weng

    (School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430000, China)

Abstract

Given the diverse socioecological consequences of rapid urban sprawl worldwide, the delineation and monitoring of urban boundaries have been widely used by local governments as a planning instrument for promoting sustainable development. This study demonstrates a fractal method to delineate urban boundaries based on raster land use maps. The basic logic is that the number of built-up land clusters and their size at each dilation step follows a power-law function. It is assumed that two spatial subsets with distinct fractal characteristics would be obtained when the deviation between the dilation curve and a straight line reaches the top point. The top point is regarded to be the optimum threshold for classifying the built-up land patches, because the fractality of built-up land would no longer exist beyond the threshold. After that, all the built-up land patches are buffered with the optimum threshold and the rank-size distribution of new clusters can be re-plotted. Instead of artificial judgement, hierarchical agglomerative clustering is utilized to automatically classify the urban and rural clusters. The approach was applied to the case of Shanghai, the most rapidly urbanizing megacity in China, and the dynamic changes of the urban boundaries from 1994 to 2016 were analyzed. On this basis, urban–rural differences were further explored through several fractal or nonfractal indices. The results show that the proposed fractal approach can accurately distinguish the urban boundary without subjective choice of thresholds. Extraordinarily different fractal dimensions, aggregation and density and similar average compactness were further identified between built-up land in urban and rural areas. The dynamic changes in the urban boundary indicated rapid urban sprawl within Shanghai during the study period. In view of the popularization and global availability of raster land use maps, this paper adds fuels to the cutting-edge topic of distinguishing the morphological criteria to universally describe urban boundaries.

Suggested Citation

  • Chong Zhao & Yu Li & Min Weng, 2021. "A Fractal Approach to Urban Boundary Delineation Based on Raster Land Use Maps: A Case of Shanghai, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:9:p:941-:d:630689
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/9/941/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/9/941/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. TANNIER, Cécile & THOMAS, Isabelle & VUIDEL, Gilles & FRANKHAUSER, Pierre, 2011. "A fractal approach to identifying urban boundaries," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2297, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    2. Lei Fang & Yingjie Wang, 2018. "Multi-Disciplinary Determination of the Rural/Urban Boundary: A Case Study in Xi’an, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-13, July.
    3. Susannah Gunn, 2007. "Green belts: A review of the regions' responses to a changing housing Agenda," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(5), pages 595-616.
    4. Isabelle Thomas & Pierre Frankhauser & Marie‐Laurence De Keersmaecker, 2007. "Fractal dimension versus density of built‐up surfaces in the periphery of Brussels," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 86(2), pages 287-308, June.
    5. J. Phillips & E. Goodstein, 2000. "Growth management and housing prices: the case of Portland, Oregon," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 18(3), pages 334-344, July.
    6. Lucien Benguigui & Efrat Blumenfeld-Lieberthal & Daniel Czamanski, 2006. "The Dynamics of the Tel Aviv Morphology," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 33(2), pages 269-284, April.
    7. Lucien Benguigui & Daniel Czamanski & Maria Marinov & Yuval Portugali, 2000. "When and Where is a City Fractal?," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 27(4), pages 507-519, August.
    8. TANNIER, Cécile & THOMAS, Isabelle, 2013. "Defining and characterizing urban boundaries: a fractal analysis of theoretical cities and Belgian cities," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2521, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    9. Chen, Yanguang & Huang, Linshan, 2019. "Modeling growth curve of fractal dimension of urban form of Beijing," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 523(C), pages 1038-1056.
    10. Isabelle Thomas & Marie-Laurence De Keersmaecker & Pierre Frankhauser, 2003. "Using fractal dimensions for characterizing intra-urban diversity. The example of Brussels," ERSA conference papers ersa03p116, European Regional Science Association.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Francisco Martínez & Bastian Sepúlveda & Hermann Manríquez, 2023. "Fractal Organization of Chilean Cities: Observations from a Developing Country," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-21, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. François Sémécurbe & Cécile Tannier & Stéphane G. Roux, 2019. "Applying two fractal methods to characterise the local and global deviations from scale invariance of built patterns throughout mainland France," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 271-293, June.
    2. Chen, Yanguang, 2013. "A set of formulae on fractal dimension relations and its application to urban form," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 150-158.
    3. Chen, Yanguang, 2022. "Normalizing and classifying shape indexes of cities by ideas from fractals," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    4. Yanguang Chen & Jiejing Wang, 2013. "Multifractal Characterization of Urban Form and Growth: The Case of Beijing," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 40(5), pages 884-904, October.
    5. Myagmartseren Purevtseren & Bazarkhand Tsegmid & Myagmarjav Indra & Munkhnaran Sugar, 2018. "The Fractal Geometry of Urban Land Use: The Case of Ulaanbaatar City, Mongolia," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-14, May.
    6. Chen, Yanguang, 2013. "Fractal analytical approach of urban form based on spatial correlation function," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 47-60.
    7. Isabelle Thomas & Pierre Frankhauser & Dominique Badariotti, 2012. "Comparing the fractality of European urban neighbourhoods: do national contexts matter?," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 189-208, April.
    8. Chen, Yanguang, 2012. "Fractal dimension evolution and spatial replacement dynamics of urban growth," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 115-124.
    9. Chen, Yanguang & Huang, Linshan, 2019. "Modeling growth curve of fractal dimension of urban form of Beijing," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 523(C), pages 1038-1056.
    10. Jian Feng & Yanguang Chen, 2010. "Spatiotemporal Evolution of Urban Form and Land-Use Structure in Hangzhou, China: Evidence from Fractals," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 37(5), pages 838-856, October.
    11. Lishan Xiao & Peiqi Shi & Tong Lin & Ning Chen & Sha Huang, 2021. "Rural Morphology and Forces Driving Change in Rapidly Urbanizing Areas: A Case Study in Fujian, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-15, April.
    12. Chen, Yanguang & Wang, Yihan & Li, Xijing, 2019. "Fractal dimensions derived from spatial allometric scaling of urban form," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 122-134.
    13. Dong Chen & Rongrong Liu & Maoxian Zhou, 2023. "Delineation of Urban Growth Boundary Based on Habitat Quality and Carbon Storage: A Case Study of Weiyuan County in Gansu, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, May.
    14. Zhijun SONG & Linjun YU, 2019. "Multifractal features of spatial variation in construction land in Beijing (1985–2015)," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-15, December.
    15. Szymon Czyża & Karol Szuniewicz & Iwona Cieślak & Andrzej Biłozor & Tomasz Bajerowski, 2023. "An Analysis of the Spatial Development of European Cities Based on Their Geometry and the CORINE Land Cover (CLC) Database," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-21, January.
    16. Qindong Fan & Fengtian Du & Hu Li, 2020. "A Study of the Spatial Form of Maling Village, Henan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-24, September.
    17. Lafourcade, Miren & Blaudin de Thé, Camille & Carantino, Benjamin, 2018. "The Carbon `Carprint' of Suburbanization: New Evidence from French Cities," CEPR Discussion Papers 13086, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    18. Jean Cavailhès & Pierre Frankhauser & Dominique Peeters & Isabelle Thomas, 2010. "Residential equilibrium in a multifractal metropolitan area," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 45(3), pages 681-704, December.
    19. Chen, Yanguang & Zhou, Yixing, 2008. "Scaling laws and indications of self-organized criticality in urban systems," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 85-98.
    20. Song, Zhijun & Jin, Wenxuan & Jiang, Guanghui & Li, Sichun & Ma, Wenqiu, 2021. "Typical and atypical multifractal systems of urban spaces—using construction land in Zhengzhou from 1988 to 2015 as an example," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:9:p:941-:d:630689. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.