IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i6p560-d563017.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying and Mapping Groups of Protected Area Visitors by Environmental Awareness

Author

Listed:
  • Arjan S. Gosal

    (School of Geography, Faculty of Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK)

  • Janine A. McMahon

    (School of Geography, Faculty of Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK)

  • Katharine M. Bowgen

    (British Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford IP24 2PU, UK)

  • Catherine H. Hoppe

    (Independent Researcher, 31515 Wunstorf, Germany)

  • Guy Ziv

    (School of Geography, Faculty of Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK)

Abstract

Protected areas worldwide receive billions of visitors annually. The positive impact of nature on health and wellbeing, in addition to providing opportunities for cultural activities such as recreation and aesthetic appreciation, is well documented. Management to reduce negative impacts to biodiversity and conservation aims whilst providing amenities and access to visitors is important. Understanding environmental awareness of visitors and their on-site spatial patterns can assist in making effective management decisions within often constrained resources. However, there is a lack of strategies for site-specific identification and predictive mapping of visitors by environmental awareness. Here, we demonstrate a method to map on-site visitation by latent groups of visitors based on their environmental awareness of on-site issues. On-site surveys and participatory mapping were used to collect data on environmental awareness on bird nesting and spatial visitation patterns in an upland moor in northern England. Latent class analysis (LCA), a structural equation model, was used to discover underlying groups of environmental awareness, with random forest (RF) modelling, a machine learning technique, using a range of on-site predictors (bioclimatic, land cover, elevation, viewshed, and proximity to paths and freshwater) to predict and map visitation across the site by each group. Visitors were segmented into ‘aware’ and ‘ambiguous’ groups and their potential spatial visitation patterns mapped. Our results demonstrate the ability to uncover groups of users by environmental awareness and map their potential visitation across a site using a variety of on-site predictors. Spatial understanding of the movement patterns of differently environmentally aware groups of visitors can assist in efficient targeting of conservation education endeavours (i.e., signage, positioning of staff, monitoring programmes, etc.), therefore maximising their efficacy. Furthermore, we anticipate this method will be of importance to environmental managers and educators when deploying limited resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Arjan S. Gosal & Janine A. McMahon & Katharine M. Bowgen & Catherine H. Hoppe & Guy Ziv, 2021. "Identifying and Mapping Groups of Protected Area Visitors by Environmental Awareness," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:6:p:560-:d:563017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/6/560/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/6/560/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jihoon Moon & Yongsung Kim & Minjae Son & Eenjun Hwang, 2018. "Hybrid Short-Term Load Forecasting Scheme Using Random Forest and Multilayer Perceptron," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, November.
    2. Kim, Aise KyoungJin & Weiler, Betty, 2013. "Visitors' attitudes towards responsible fossil collecting behaviour: An environmental attitude-based segmentation approach," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 602-612.
    3. Kuhn, Max, 2008. "Building Predictive Models in R Using the caret Package," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 28(i05).
    4. Linzer, Drew A. & Lewis, Jeffrey B., 2011. "poLCA: An R Package for Polytomous Variable Latent Class Analysis," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 42(i10).
    5. Kursa, Miron B. & Rudnicki, Witold R., 2010. "Feature Selection with the Boruta Package," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 36(i11).
    6. Wright, Marvin N. & Ziegler, Andreas, 2017. "ranger: A Fast Implementation of Random Forests for High Dimensional Data in C++ and R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 77(i01).
    7. Burger, Joanna & Leonard, Justin, 2000. "Conflict resolution in coastal waters: the case of personal watercraft," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 61-67, January.
    8. Ehrlich, Oren & Bi, Xiang & Borisova, Tatiana & Larkin, Sherry, 2017. "A latent class analysis of public attitudes toward water resources with implications for recreational demand," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PA), pages 124-132.
    9. Joseph Mascaro & Gregory P Asner & David E Knapp & Ty Kennedy-Bowdoin & Roberta E Martin & Christopher Anderson & Mark Higgins & K Dana Chadwick, 2014. "A Tale of Two “Forests”: Random Forest Machine Learning Aids Tropical Forest Carbon Mapping," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-9, January.
    10. Peschel, Anne & Grebitus, Carola & Steiner, Bodo & Veeman, Michele, 2016. "How does consumer knowledge affect environmentally sustainable choices? Evidence from a cross-country latent class analysis of food labels," MPRA Paper 69864, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Wolf, Isabelle D. & Hagenloh, Gerald & Croft, David B., 2012. "Visitor monitoring along roads and hiking trails: How to determine usage levels in tourist sites," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 16-28.
    12. Weaver, David B. & Lawton, Laura J., 2017. "A new visitation paradigm for protected areas," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 140-146.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kalliopi Kanaki & Michail Kalogiannakis & Emmanouil Poulakis & Panagiotis Politis, 2022. "Investigating the Association between Algorithmic Thinking and Performance in Environmental Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Chidiebere Ofoegbu & Heiko Balzter & Martin Phillips, 2023. "Evidence Synthesis towards a Holistic Landscape Decision Framework: Insight from the Landscape Decisions Programme," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Abang Zainoren Abang Abdurahman & Wan Fairos Wan Yaacob & Syerina Azlin Md Nasir & Serah Jaya & Suhaili Mokhtar, 2022. "Using Machine Learning to Predict Visitors to Totally Protected Areas in Sarawak, Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, February.
    4. Juan F. Beltrán & John A. Litvaitis & Pedro Abellán, 2022. "Seeking Sustainable Solutions in a Time of Change," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-2, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesco Sartor & Jonathan P. Moore & Hans-Peter Kubis, 2021. "Plasma Interleukin-10 and Cholesterol Levels May Inform about Interdependences between Fitness and Fatness in Healthy Individuals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Van Belle, Jente & Guns, Tias & Verbeke, Wouter, 2021. "Using shared sell-through data to forecast wholesaler demand in multi-echelon supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(2), pages 466-479.
    3. Petra HLAVÁČKOVÁ & Hana SLOVÁČKOVÁ & David BŘEZINA & Jakub MICHAL, 2018. "Comparison of results of visitor arrival monitoring using regression analysis," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 64(7), pages 303-312.
    4. Marc Deffland & Claudia Spies & Bjoern Weiss & Niklas Keller & Mirjam Jenny & Jochen Kruppa & Felix Balzer, 2020. "Effects of pain, sedation and delirium monitoring on clinical and economic outcome: A retrospective study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-14, September.
    5. Faisal Alsayegh & Moh A Alkhamis & Fatima Ali & Sreeja Attur & Nicholas M Fountain-Jones & Mohammad Zubaid, 2022. "Anemia or other comorbidities? using machine learning to reveal deeper insights into the drivers of acute coronary syndromes in hospital admitted patients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-15, January.
    6. Franck M. Ramaharo & Michael Fitiavana Randriamifidy, 2023. "Determinants of renewable energy consumption in Madagascar: Evidence from feature selection algorithms," Working Papers hal-04262240, HAL.
    7. David Zejda & Josef Zelenka, 2019. "The Concept of Comprehensive Tracking Software to Support Sustainable Tourism in Protected Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-18, July.
    8. Migle Janulaitiene & Vilmantas Gegzna & Lina Baranauskiene & Aistė Bulavaitė & Martynas Simanavicius & Milda Pleckaityte, 2018. "Phenotypic characterization of Gardnerella vaginalis subgroups suggests differences in their virulence potential," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, July.
    9. Satre-Meloy, Aven & Diakonova, Marina & Grünewald, Philipp, 2020. "Cluster analysis and prediction of residential peak demand profiles using occupant activity data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    10. Sara Saadatmand & Khodakaram Salimifard & Reza Mohammadi & Alex Kuiper & Maryam Marzban & Akram Farhadi, 2023. "Using machine learning in prediction of ICU admission, mortality, and length of stay in the early stage of admission of COVID-19 patients," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 328(1), pages 1043-1071, September.
    11. Svetlana Kresova & Sebastian Hess, 2022. "Identifying the Determinants of Regional Raw Milk Prices in Russia Using Machine Learning," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, July.
    12. László Pásztor & Katalin Takács & János Mészáros & Gábor Szatmári & Mátyás Árvai & Tibor Tóth & Gyöngyi Barna & Sándor Koós & Zsófia Adrienn Kovács & Péter László & Kitti Balog, 2023. "Indirect Prediction of Salt Affected Soil Indicator Properties through Habitat Types of a Natural Saline Grassland Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Imagery," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-23, July.
    13. Hirche, Martin & Farris, Paul W. & Greenacre, Luke & Quan, Yiran & Wei, Susan, 2021. "Predicting Under- and Overperforming SKUs within the Distribution–Market Share Relationship," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 97(4), pages 697-714.
    14. Vincenzo Cribari & Michael P. Strager & Aaron E. Maxwell & Charles Yuill, 2021. "Landscape Changes in the Southern Coalfields of West Virginia: Multi-Level Intensity Analysis and Surface Mining Transitions in the Headwaters of the Coal River from 1976 to 2016," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-32, July.
    15. Kresova, Svetlana & Hess, Sebastian, 2021. "Determinants of Regional Raw Milk Prices in Russia," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315064, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Nanna Munck & Patrick Murigu Kamau Njage & Pimlapas Leekitcharoenphon & Eva Litrup & Tine Hald, 2020. "Application of Whole‐Genome Sequences and Machine Learning in Source Attribution of Salmonella Typhimurium," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(9), pages 1693-1705, September.
    17. Tanzeela Khalid & Raphael Aggio & Paul White & Ben De Lacy Costello & Raj Persad & Huda Al-Kateb & Peter Jones & Chris S Probert & Norman Ratcliffe, 2015. "Urinary Volatile Organic Compounds for the Detection of Prostate Cancer," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.
    18. Kresova, Svetlana & Hess, Sebastian, 2021. "Determinants of Regional Raw Milk Prices in Russia," 61st Annual Conference, Berlin, Germany, September 22-24, 2021 317051, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    19. Gehan A. Mousa & Elsayed A. H. Elamir & Khaled Hussainey, 2022. "Using machine learning methods to predict financial performance: Does disclosure tone matter?," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(1), pages 93-112, March.
    20. Matthew Harding & Gabriel F. R. Vasconcelos, 2022. "Managers versus Machines: Do Algorithms Replicate Human Intuition in Credit Ratings?," Papers 2202.04218, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:6:p:560-:d:563017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.