IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i11p1177-d670641.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identification and Optimization of the Spatial Structure of Urban and Rural Settlements from a Hierarchical Network Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Qingqing Ye

    (School of Engineering Management and Real Estate, Henan University of Economics and Law, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

  • Jiwei Li

    (School of Resources and Environment, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China)

  • Xuesong Kong

    (School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Shaokai Zhang

    (Geophysical and Spatial Information Institute of Henan Province, Zhengzhou 450009, China)

Abstract

China has entered a new era of comprehensive promotion of rural revitalization and integrated urban–rural development. The identification and optimization of the spatial structure of urban and rural settlements are of great significance to the realization of rural revitalization and integrated urban–rural development. This study proposes a method framework for identifying and optimizing the spatial structure of urban and rural settlements from a hierarchical network perspective. This framework includes three parts—namely, the identification, analysis, and optimization of the hierarchical network structure of these settlements. The identification of this structure is the foundation of this study. To realize the identification, for each settlement, this study finds and retains its strongest interaction with other settlements which have a stronger capacity for development. This study used Hua County in Henan, China, as an example to verify the method framework. Results showed that the spatial structure of the urban and rural settlements in Hua County identified in this study was complete and continuous, with significant hierarchical and community characteristics. Based on this, a five-level optimization system of these settlements was constructed. This study expands the method used to study the spatial structure of urban and rural settlements from the network perspective and has a theoretical and practical significance for the optimization of the spatial structure of these settlements.

Suggested Citation

  • Qingqing Ye & Jiwei Li & Xuesong Kong & Shaokai Zhang, 2021. "Identification and Optimization of the Spatial Structure of Urban and Rural Settlements from a Hierarchical Network Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:11:p:1177-:d:670641
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/11/1177/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/11/1177/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Batara Surya & Despry Nur Annisa Ahmad & Harry Hardian Sakti & Hernita Sahban, 2020. "Land Use Change, Spatial Interaction, and Sustainable Development in the Metropolitan Urban Areas, South Sulawesi Province, Indonesia," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-43, March.
    2. Pengfei Guo & Fangfang Zhang & Haiying Wang & Fen Qin, 2020. "Suitability Evaluation and Layout Optimization of the Spatial Distribution of Rural Residential Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Yubo Zhao & Gui Zhang & Hongwei Zhao & Anirban Chakraborti, 2021. "Spatial Network Structures of Urban Agglomeration Based on the Improved Gravity Model: A Case Study in China’s Two Urban Agglomerations," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-17, February.
    4. Sheng Wei & Jiangang Xu & Haitao Ma, 2019. "Exploring public bicycle network structure based on complex network theory and shortest path analysis: the public bicycle system in Yixing, China," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(3), pages 293-307, April.
    5. Ma, Wenqiu & Jiang, Guanghui & Zhang, Ruijuan & Li, Yuling & Jiang, Xiaoguang, 2018. "Achieving rural spatial restructuring in China: A suitable framework to understand how structural transitions in rural residential land differ across peri-urban interface?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 583-593.
    6. Yan Ma & Feng Xue, 2019. "Deciphering the Spatial Structures of City Networks in the Economic Zone of the West Side of the Taiwan Strait through the Lens of Functional and Innovation Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-20, May.
    7. Bastiaan De Goei & Martijn Burger & Frank Van Oort & Michael Kitson, 2010. "Functional Polycentrism and Urban Network Development in the Greater South East, United Kingdom: Evidence from Commuting Patterns, 1981-2001," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(9), pages 1149-1170.
    8. James LeSage & Carlos Llano-Verduras, 2014. "Forecasting spatially dependent origin and destination commodity flows," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 1543-1562, December.
    9. Martijn J. Burger & Bert van der Knaap & Ronald S. Wall, 2014. "Polycentricity and the Multiplexity of Urban Networks," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 816-840, April.
    10. Sadasivuni, R. & Cooke, W.H. & Bhushan, S., 2013. "Wildfire risk prediction in Southeastern Mississippi using population interaction," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 297-306.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gabriel Kuczman & Denis Bechera & Zdenka Rózová & Attila Tóth, 2024. "Roadside Vegetation Functions, Woody Plant Values, and Ecosystem Services in Rural Streetscapes: A Qualitative Study on Rural Settlements in Western Slovakia," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-27, February.
    2. Leiru Wei & Xiaojie Zhao & Jianxin Lu, 2022. "Measuring the Level of Urban–Rural Integration Development and Analyzing the Spatial Pattern Based on the New Development Concept: Evidence from Cities in the Yellow River Basin," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-26, December.
    3. Hao Mei & Jin Yang & Mingshun Xiang & Xiaofeng Yang & Chunjian Wang & Wenheng Li & Suhua Yang, 2022. "Evaluation and Optimization Model of Rural Settlement Habitability in the Upper Reaches of the Minjiang River, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Xiaohu Liu & Lei Yuan & Gangyi Tan, 2023. "Identification and Hierarchy of Traditional Village Characteristics Based on Concentrated Contiguous Development—Taking 206 Traditional Villages in Hubei Province as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, February.
    5. Jizhe Zhou & Yanhong Jiang & Shaolin Niu & Lan Li & Weijia Li & Yahui Zhang & Dongyang Liu, 2023. "Spatial Optimization of Rural Settlements in a Small Watershed Based on Social Network Analysis," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 799-823, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shangkun Yu & Yi Miao & Mengcheng Li & Xiaoming Ding & Chengxin Wang & Wangsheng Dou, 2022. "Theoretical Development Model for Rural Settlements against Rural Shrinkage: An Empirical Study on Pingyin County, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Batara Surya & Agus Salim & Hernita Hernita & Seri Suriani & Firman Menne & Emil Salim Rasyidi, 2021. "Land Use Change, Urban Agglomeration, and Urban Sprawl: A Sustainable Development Perspective of Makassar City, Indonesia," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-31, May.
    3. Chen Zhong & Markus Schläpfer & Stefan Müller Arisona & Michael Batty & Carlo Ratti & Gerhard Schmitt, 2017. "Revealing centrality in the spatial structure of cities from human activity patterns," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(2), pages 437-455, February.
    4. Antoine Peris & Evert Meijers & Maarten Ham, 2018. "The Evolution of the Systems of Cities Literature Since 1995: Schools of Thought and their Interaction," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 533-554, September.
    5. Weiyang Zhang & Ben Derudder, 2019. "How sensitive are measures of polycentricity to the choice of ‘centres’? A methodological and empirical exploration," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(16), pages 3339-3357, December.
    6. Nir Kaplan & Itzhak Omer, 2022. "Multiscale Accessibility—A New Perspective of Space Structuration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, April.
    7. Feng, Yuhao & Wu, Shufan & Wu, Peixin & Su, Shiliang & Weng, Min & Bian, Meng, 2018. "Spatiotemporal characterization of megaregional poly-centrality: Evidence for new urban hypotheses and implications for polycentric policies," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 712-731.
    8. Kyusang Kwon & Minho Seo, 2018. "Does the Polycentric Urban Region Contribute to Economic Performance? The Case of Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-10, November.
    9. Yameng Wang & Zhe Chen & Xiumei Wang & Mengyang Hou & Feng Wei, 2021. "Research on the Spatial Network Structure and Influencing Factors of the Allocation Efficiency of Agricultural Science and Technology Resources in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-23, November.
    10. Albrecht Kauffmann, 2016. "Is the ‘Central German Metropolitan Region’ spatially integrated? An empirical assessment of commuting relations," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(9), pages 1853-1868, July.
    11. Kang Wu & Jingxian Tang & Ying Long, 2019. "Delineating the Regional Economic Geography of China by the Approach of Community Detection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-18, October.
    12. Yingcheng Li & Nicholas Phelps, 2018. "Megalopolis unbound: Knowledge collaboration and functional polycentricity within and beyond the Yangtze River Delta Region in China, 2014," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(2), pages 443-460, February.
    13. Kauffmann, Albrecht, 2021. "Befindet sich die "Metropolregion Mitteldeutschland" auf dem Weg zur räumlich integrierten Region? Eine empirische Untersuchung der Berufspendlerverflechtungen," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Rosenfeld, Martin T. W. & Stefansky, Andreas (ed.), "Metropolregion Mitteldeutschland" aus raumwissenschaftlicher Sicht, volume 30, pages 76-95, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    14. Vicente Romero de à vila Serrano, 2019. "The Intrametropolitan Geography of Knowledge-Intensive Business Services (KIBS): A Comparative Analysis of Six European and U.S. City-Regions," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 33(4), pages 279-295, November.
    15. Peng Gao & Dan He & Zhijing Sun & Yuemin Ning, 2020. "Characterizing functionally integrated regions in the Central Yangtze River Megaregion from a city‐network perspective," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 1357-1379, September.
    16. Ni, Linglin & Wang, Xiaokun (Cara) & Zhang, Dapeng, 2016. "Impacts of information technology and urbanization on less-than-truckload freight flows in China: An analysis considering spatial effects," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 12-25.
    17. Ma, Wen & Fang, Zhuoqiong & Zhang, Xiangfeng, 2023. "Comparative analysis of structural characteristics of China's 18 typical urban agglomerations based on flows of various elements," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 479(C).
    18. Van Butsic & Maggi Kelly & Max A. Moritz, 2015. "Land Use and Wildfire: A Review of Local Interactions and Teleconnections," Land, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-17, February.
    19. Peng Ji & Lilin Yuan, 2023. "Whether polycentric spatial structure is conducive to regional coordinated development: A study on urban agglomerations in China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(4), pages 940-961, December.
    20. Yue, Wenze & Wang, Tianyu & Liu, Yong & Zhang, Qun & Ye, Xinyue, 2019. "Mismatch of morphological and functional polycentricity in Chinese cities: An evidence from land development and functional linkage," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:11:p:1177-:d:670641. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.