IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v17y2024i3p109-d1352967.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Investigation of Preference Attributes of Indonesian Mobile Banking Users to Develop a Strategy for Mobile Banking Adoption

Author

Listed:
  • Toto Edrinal Sebayang

    (School of Business, IPB University, Bogor 16151, Indonesia
    Department of International Business Management, Bina Nusantara University, Tangerang 15325, Indonesia)

  • Dedi Budiman Hakim

    (Department of Economics and International Center for Applied Finance and Economics, IPB University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia)

  • Toni Bakhtiar

    (Department of Mathematics, IPB University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia)

  • Dikky Indrawan

    (School of Business, IPB University, Bogor 16151, Indonesia)

Abstract

A new normal has been established as a result of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on social behavior, technology, and business. This has a significant effect on how technology is used, such as mobile banking services, which offer more hygienic and secure payment alternatives than cash. Mobile banking has been viewed as having the ability to enhance access to unbanked customers in developing economies such as Indonesia, where 100 million people remain unbanked. This study aims to develop strategies using importance-performance analysis (IPA) to improve adoption based on the perceived importance and performance of 1441 mobile banking users during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data were collected using an online questionnaire administered during the period of September 2022 to March 2023 using the mobile banking adoption attributes of Attitude, Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, Compatibility, Subjective Norm, Interpersonal Influence, External Influence, Perceived Behavior Control, facilitating conditions, self-efficacy, firm reputation, trust, disease risk, performance risk, financial risk, privacy risk, time risk, psychological risk, and perceived risk. IPA results were divided into four quadrants: “concentrate here”, “keep up the good work”, “low priority”, and “possible overkill” with a representation that respondents regard as important and well-addressed. The findings show that bank strategists seeking competitive advantage must push innovation efforts to protect users by improving privacy risk and financial risk and enhancing mobile banking security from potential cyberattacks. Digital banks and associated institutions need to educate mobile banking customers on the benefits of security measures for these services, which may improve confidence and trust, and consequently, accelerate mobile banking adoption.

Suggested Citation

  • Toto Edrinal Sebayang & Dedi Budiman Hakim & Toni Bakhtiar & Dikky Indrawan, 2024. "The Investigation of Preference Attributes of Indonesian Mobile Banking Users to Develop a Strategy for Mobile Banking Adoption," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-20, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:3:p:109-:d:1352967
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/3/109/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/3/109/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mathew Joseph & David Allbright & George Stone & Yasmin Sekhon & Julie Tinson, 2005. "Importance-performance analysis of UK and US bank customer perceptions of service delivery technologies," International Journal of Financial Services Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1), pages 66-88.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Esmailpour, Javad & Aghabayk, Kayvan & Abrari Vajari, Mohammad & De Gruyter, Chris, 2020. "Importance – Performance Analysis (IPA) of bus service attributes: A case study in a developing country," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 129-150.
    2. Silvance O. Abeka & Evance Ochieng¡¯ Abeka, 2012. "Percieved Importance and Perfomance of Information Systems in Azam Company- Dar Es Salaam," International Journal of Learning and Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 2(3), pages 9-24, June.
    3. Chen, Pin-Zheng & Liu, Wan-Yu, 2019. "Assessing management performance of the national forest park using impact range-performance analysis and impact-asymmetry analysis," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 121-138.
    4. Francisco Javier Forcadell & Elisa Aracil & Fernando Ubeda, 2020. "Using reputation for corporate sustainability to tackle banks digitalization challenges," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2181-2193, September.
    5. Karim Charaf & Ahmed Fath-Allah Rahmouni, 2014. "Using Importance Performance Analysis to Evaluate the Satisfaction of Activity-Based Costing Adopters," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 13(4), pages 665-685, December.
    6. Azzopardi, Ernest & Nash, Robert, 2013. "A critical evaluation of importance–performance analysis," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 222-233.
    7. Mohamed M. Khalifa Tailab, 2020. "Using Importance-Performance Matrix Analysis to Evaluate the Financial Performance of American Banks During the Financial Crisis," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440209, January.
    8. Aridah MAMOUN WALID & Ramadhan SHERZAD, 2020. "The impact of using electronic payment methods on transparency and disclosure: Case study Jordanian companies," Smart Cities and Regional Development (SCRD) Journal, Smart-EDU Hub, vol. 4(2), pages 117-138, June.
    9. Reema Bera & Bhargab Maitra, 2023. "Identification of Priority Areas of Improvement for Small Passenger Car Segment in Indian Market," Vision, , vol. 27(2), pages 225-242, April.
    10. Sever, Ivan, 2015. "Importance-performance analysis: A valid management tool?," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 43-53.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:3:p:109-:d:1352967. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.