IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v15y2022i10p466-d944468.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Would You like to Work More Hours?—An Investigation on South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina Raluca Gh. Popescu

    (Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Business and Administration, University of Bucharest, 030018 Bucharest, Romania
    Department of Economics and Economic Policy, Economics I Doctoral School, Faculty of Theoretical and Applied Economics, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Esra Karapınar Kocağ

    (Department of Social Service and Counselling, Gumushane University, Gumushane 29100, Turkey)

Abstract

To begin with, Sustainable Development Goals are of tremendous importance in all areas, being seen as vital aims in all domains, which makes them indispensable when it comes to addressing the particularities of the labour market these days. Subsequently, human resources occupy a distinctive and unique position when referring to the implications derived from targeting Sustainable Development Goals, especially in the context represented by the period specific to the COVID-19 pandemic and the international events that followed immediately after that. This study investigates the work motivation of individuals, and whether they would be willing to work more hours if they are paid. Motivation and attitudes towards working more hours might be affected by several factors, and they are important contributors to business performance. Not only business performance is to be affected, but this is also a part of Sustainable Development Goals where labour market conditions and productivity concerns are addressed, along with several other factors. Using the Quarterly Labour Force Survey from 2017 to 2022 that is conducted by Statistics South Africa, this study attempts to shed light on individual preferences for working more hours in the case of South Africa. Considering the dichotomous dependent variable, a binary response model is utilised to explore the determinants of such behaviour. Findings of the probit model reveal that socio-demographic factors such as gender, marital status, education level, and work experience are important indicators to explain this preference. More precisely, being female increases the likelihood of willingness to work more hours if paid by 1.1 percentage points, and being never married increases that probability by 2.7 percentage points. Within education categories, the highest coefficient in magnitude, having tertiary education decreases the probability of willingness to work more hours by 8.2 percentage points. As an important labour market indicator, one more year to commence working increases the probability of willingness to work more hours by 0.4 percentage points.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina Raluca Gh. Popescu & Esra Karapınar Kocağ, 2022. "Would You like to Work More Hours?—An Investigation on South Africa," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:15:y:2022:i:10:p:466-:d:944468
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/15/10/466/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/15/10/466/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Isabelle Desnoyers-James & Sara Calligaris & Flavio Calvino, 2019. "DynEmp and MultiProd: Metadata," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2019/03, OECD Publishing.
    2. Diane F. Frey & Gillian MacNaughton, 2016. "A Human Rights Lens on Full Employment and Decent Work in the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(2), pages 21582440166, June.
    3. Cristina Raluca Gh. Popescu & Gheorghe N. Popescu, 2019. "An Exploratory Study Based on a Questionnaire Concerning Green and Sustainable Finance, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Performance: Evidence from the Romanian Business Environment," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-79, October.
    4. Cristina Raluca Gh. Popescu, 2020. "Sustainability Assessment: Does the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework for BEPS (Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project) Put an End to Disputes Over The Recognition and Measurement of Intellectual Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-22, November.
    5. Sarah Wild, 2018. "South Africa pushes science to improve daily life," Nature, Nature, vol. 561(7722), pages 158-159, September.
    6. Cristina Raluca Gh. Popescu, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Governance and Business Performance: Limits and Challenges Imposed by the Implementation of Directive 2013/34/EU in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-31, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Almorza-Gomar & Rafael Ravina-Ripoll & Cristina Raluca Gh. Popescu & Araceli Galiano-Coronil, 2022. "Evaluation of an Experience of Academic Happiness through Football at University," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-13, May.
    2. Jana Kozáková & Mária Urbánová & Radovan Savov, 2021. "Factors Influencing the Extent of the Ethical Codes: Evidence from Slovakia," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Maria Luisa Scalvedi & Laura Rossi, 2021. "Comprehensive Measurement of Italian Domestic Food Waste in a European Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Ibrahim Kabir & Umar Gunu & Zainab Lawal Gwadabe, 2023. "Decent Work Environment and Work-Life Balance: Empirical Analysis of Banking Sector of Hostile Environments," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 297-312, June.
    5. Sardar Muhammad Usman & Farasat Ali Shah Bukhari & Huiwei You & Daniel Badulescu & Darie Gavrilut, 2020. "The Effect and Impact of Signals on Investing Decisions in Reward-Based Crowdfunding: A Comparative Study of China and the United Kingdom," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Dariusz Klimek, 2020. "Sustainable Enterprise Capital Management," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, February.
    7. Halkos, George & Gkampoura, Eleni-Christina, 2021. "Where do we stand on the 17 Sustainable Development Goals? An overview on progress," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 94-122.
    8. Kumari, Alka & Singh, Manvendra Pratap, 2023. "A journey of social sustainability in organization during MDG & SDG period: A bibliometric analysis," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    9. Dalia Streimikiene & Biruta Svagzdiene & Edmundas Jasinskas & Arturas Simanavicius, 2021. "Sustainable tourism development and competitiveness: The systematic literature review," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 259-271, January.
    10. Olivera Kostoska & Ljupco Kocarev, 2019. "A Novel ICT Framework for Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-31, April.
    11. Arvind Ashta, 2021. "Towards a New Form of Undemocratic Capitalism: Introducing Macro-Equity to Finance Development Post COVID-19 Crisis," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-7, March.
    12. Jose Joy Thoppan & Robert Jeyakumar Nathan & Vijay Victor, 2021. "Impact of Improved Corporate Governance and Regulations on Earnings Management Practices—Analysis of 7 Industries from the Indian National Stock Exchange," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-15, September.
    13. Mirela Sichigea & Marian Ilie Siminica & Daniel Circiumaru & Silviu Carstina & Nela-Loredana Caraba-Meita, 2020. "A Comparative Approach of the Environmental Performance between Periods with Positive and Negative Accounting Returns of EEA Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    14. Pengwei Wang & Lirong Han & Rong Mei, 2022. "An Impact Asymmetry Analysis of Small Urban Green Space Attributes to Enhance Visitor Satisfaction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-15, March.
    15. David K. Ding & Ya Eem Chea, 2021. "Executive Compensation and Firm Performance in New Zealand: The Role of Employee Stock Option Plans," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, January.
    16. Elena-Sabina Turnea & Ștefan Andrei Neștian & Silviu Mihail Tiță & Ana Iolanda Vodă & Alexandra Luciana Guță, 2020. "Dismissals and Temporary Leaves in Romanian Companies in the Context of Low Demand and Cash Flow Problems during the COVID-19 Economic Lockdown," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-22, October.
    17. Michael Peneder & Fabian Unterlass, 2024. "Die Produktivitätsentwicklung österreichischer Unternehmen in den Jahren 2013 bis 2020. Eine Auswertung von Mikrodaten," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 97(2), pages 43-56, February.
    18. Sumei Luo & Guangyou Zhou & Jinpeng Zhou, 2021. "The Impact of Electronic Money on Monetary Policy: Based on DSGE Model Simulations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(20), pages 1-26, October.
    19. Monica-Laura ZLATI (SORICI) & Svetlana MIHAILA & Veronica GROSU, 2022. "Financial Performance Analysis From A Social Welfare Perspective - A Comparative Study Romania-Moldova," Eastern European Journal for Regional Studies (EEJRS), Center for Studies in European Integration (CSEI), Academy of Economic Studies of Moldova (ASEM), vol. 8(1), pages 63-76, June.
    20. Avi Perez, 2020. "Lack of Uniformity in the Israeli Property Tax System 1997–2017," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-11, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:15:y:2022:i:10:p:466-:d:944468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.