IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijfss/v11y2023i1p14-d1026256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability Initiatives, Knowledge-Intensive Innovators, and Firms’ Performance: An Empirical Examination

Author

Listed:
  • Rajesh Kumar Bhaskaran

    (Department of Finance, Institute of Management Technology, Dubai 345006, United Arab Emirates)

Abstract

This paper examines the role of sustainability as a major driver of innovation, and assesses its affect on firms’ performance. This study was based on companies listed in the Forbes list of 100 most innovative companies and BCG’s 50 most innovative companies. The innovative sample firms had higher ESG and component scores than the matched control firms, with statistical significance. In terms of distinctiveness of governance, the innovative firms had larger boards, independent board members, higher diversity, and longer board tenure. Innovative firms had superior financial performance in comparison with the matched control firms. A logit regression model was employed to predict whether firms that adopt sustainability initiatives tend also to be innovative companies. Firms with high intensity of investment in social and governance initiatives tended to be innovative. Innovative firms had greater focus on social initiatives related to employee satisfaction, promotion of a healthy and safe workplace, and diversity. However, innovative firms tended to score lower in terms of human rights initiatives. Innovative firms provided superior governance practices for shareholders and effective usage of antitakeover defense mechanisms. Debt-intensive firms tended to be innovative.

Suggested Citation

  • Rajesh Kumar Bhaskaran, 2023. "Sustainability Initiatives, Knowledge-Intensive Innovators, and Firms’ Performance: An Empirical Examination," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:11:y:2023:i:1:p:14-:d:1026256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/11/1/14/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/11/1/14/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marcus Wagner, 2009. "Innovation and competitive advantages from the integration of strategic aspects with social and environmental management in European firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(5), pages 291-306, July.
    2. Alessandro Marra & Vittorio Carlei & Cristiano Baldassari, 2020. "Exploring networks of proximity for partner selection, firms' collaboration and knowledge exchange. The case of clean‐tech industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1034-1044, March.
    3. Patricia S. Sánchez-Medina & Jack Corbett & Arcelia Toledo-López, 2011. "Environmental Innovation and Sustainability in Small Handicraft Businesses in Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(7), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Ayuso, Silvia & Rodriguez, Miguel A. & Ricart, Joan E., 2006. "Using stakeholder dialogue as a source for new ideas. A dynamic capability underlying sustainable innovation," IESE Research Papers D/633, IESE Business School.
    5. Mingfeng Tang & Grace Walsh & Daniel Lerner & Markus A. Fitza & Qiaohua Li, 2018. "Green Innovation, Managerial Concern and Firm Performance: An Empirical Study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 39-51, January.
    6. Jing-Wen Huang & Yong-Hui Li, 2017. "Green Innovation and Performance: The View of Organizational Capability and Social Reciprocity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 145(2), pages 309-324, October.
    7. Ramanathan, Ramakrishnan & Ramanathan, Usha & Bentley, Yongmei, 2018. "The debate on flexibility of environmental regulations, innovation capabilities and financial performance – A novel use of DEA," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 131-138.
    8. Yongtao Song & Junya Cai & Taiwen Feng, 2017. "The Influence of Green Supply Chain Integration on Firm Performance: A Contingency and Configuration Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-18, May.
    9. Timo Busch & Gunnar Friede, 2018. "The Robustness of the Corporate Social and Financial Performance Relation: A Second‐Order Meta‐Analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(4), pages 583-608, July.
    10. Ernesto Lopez-Valeiras & Jacobo Gomez-Conde & David Naranjo-Gil, 2015. "Sustainable Innovation, Management Accounting and Control Systems, and International Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-14, March.
    11. Justyna Przychodzen & Wojciech Przychodzen, 2013. "Corporate sustainability and shareholder wealth," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(4), pages 474-493, May.
    12. Hye-Young Joo & Yong-Won Seo & Hokey Min, 2018. "Examining the effects of government intervention on the firm’s environmental and technological innovation capabilities and export performance," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(18), pages 6090-6111, September.
    13. Justin Doran & Geraldine Ryan, 2016. "The Importance of the Diverse Drivers and Types of Environmental Innovation for Firm Performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 102-119, February.
    14. Chao Hung Wang & Wei‐Jr Juo, 2021. "An environmental policy of green intellectual capital: Green innovation strategy for performance sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3241-3254, November.
    15. Hideki Kobayashi & Masahiro Kato & Yukishige Maezawa & Kenji Sano, 2011. "An R&D Management Framework for Eco-Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(8), pages 1-20, August.
    16. Hashi, Iraj & Stojčić, Nebojša, 2013. "The impact of innovation activities on firm performance using a multi-stage model: Evidence from the Community Innovation Survey 4," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 353-366.
    17. Klaus Rennings & Christian Rammer, 2011. "The Impact of Regulation-Driven Environmental Innovation on Innovation Success and Firm Performance," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 255-283.
    18. Yu-Shan Chen & Yu-Hsien Lin & Ching-Ying Lin & Chih-Wei Chang, 2015. "Enhancing Green Absorptive Capacity, Green Dynamic Capacities and Green Service Innovation to Improve Firm Performance: An Analysis of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-19, November.
    19. Thomas Dyllick & Kai Hockerts, 2002. "Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(2), pages 130-141, March.
    20. Kuen‐Hung Tsai & Yi‐Chuan Liao, 2017. "Sustainability Strategy and Eco‐Innovation: A Moderation Model," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 426-437, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Naeimah Fahad S. Almawishir & Houcine Benlaria, 2023. "Using the PLS-SEM Model to Measure the Impact of the Knowledge Economy on Sustainable Development in the Al-Jouf Region of Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-23, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ayça Kubra Hizarci‐Payne & İlayda İpek & Gülüzar Kurt Gümüş, 2021. "How environmental innovation influences firm performance: A meta‐analytic review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 1174-1190, February.
    2. Zhang Xiaoyi & Hailan Yang & Nilesh Kumar & Maqsood H. Bhutto & Wang Kun & Tianyang Hu, 2023. "Assessing Chinese Textile and Apparel Industry Business Sustainability: The Role of Organization Green Culture, Green Dynamic Capabilities, and Green Innovation in Relation to Environmental Orientatio," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-21, May.
    3. Yu Wang & Yetaotao Qiu & Yi Luo, 2022. "CEO foreign experience and corporate sustainable development: Evidence from China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2036-2051, July.
    4. Tariq, Adeel & Badir, Yuosre F. & Tariq, Waqas & Bhutta, Umair Saeed, 2017. "Drivers and consequences of green product and process innovation: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future outlook," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 8-23.
    5. Yueping Du & Huanhuan Wang, 2022. "Green Innovation Sustainability: How Green Market Orientation and Absorptive Capacity Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, July.
    6. Manjot Singh Bhatia, 2021. "Green process innovation and operational performance: The role of proactive environment strategy, technological capabilities, and organizational learning," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 2845-2857, November.
    7. Syed Muhammad Fazal‐e‐Hasan & Hormoz Ahmadi & Harjit Sekhon & Gary Mortimer & Mohd Sadiq & Husni Kharouf & Muhammad Abid, 2023. "The role of green innovation and hope in employee retention," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 220-239, January.
    8. Yue‐Jun Zhang & Wei Shi & Lin Jiang, 2020. "Does China's carbon emissions trading policy improve the technology innovation of relevant enterprises?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 872-885, March.
    9. Yuan Li & Nan Huang & Yang Zhao, 2022. "The Impact of Green Innovation on Enterprise Green Economic Efficiency," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-26, December.
    10. Wei‐Jr Juo & Chao‐Hung Wang, 2022. "Does green innovation mediate the relationship between green relational view and competitive advantage?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2456-2468, July.
    11. Burcu Özgül & Cemal Zehir, 2023. "How Managers’ Green Transformational Leadership Affects a Firm’s Environmental Strategy, Green Innovation, and Performance: The Moderating Impact of Differentiation Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    12. Naila Nureen & Da Liu & Muhammad Irfan & Maida Malik & Usama Awan, 2023. "Nexuses among Green Supply Chain Management, Green Human Capital, Managerial Environmental Knowledge, and Firm Performance: Evidence from a Developing Country," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, March.
    13. Wu, Jiamei & Chen, Zhibin & Guo, Chong, 2022. "How does anti-corruption affect green innovation? Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 405-424.
    14. Antonella Biscione & Raul Caruso & Annunziata de Felice, 2021. "Environmental innovation in European transition countries," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(5), pages 521-535, January.
    15. Chao Hung Wang & Wei‐Jr Juo, 2021. "An environmental policy of green intellectual capital: Green innovation strategy for performance sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3241-3254, November.
    16. Febi Jensen & Hans Lööf & Andreas Stephan, 2020. "New ventures in Cleantech: Opportunities, capabilities and innovation outcomes," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 902-917, March.
    17. Stojčić, Nebojša, 2021. "Social and private outcomes of green innovation incentives in European advancing economies," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    18. Jinqiu He & Huiwen Su, 2022. "Digital Transformation and Green Innovation of Chinese Firms: The Moderating Role of Regulatory Pressure and International Opportunities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-21, October.
    19. Yousaf, Umair Bin & Ullah, Irfan & Jiang, Junchen & Wang, Man, 2022. "The role of board capital in driving green innovation: Evidence from China," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    20. Wunhong Su & Chun Guo & Xiaobao Song, 2022. "Media coverage, Environment Protection Law and environmental research and development: evidence from the Chinese-listed firms," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 6953-6983, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:11:y:2023:i:1:p:14-:d:1026256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.