IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i22p15323-d978206.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatiotemporal Evolution and Driving Forces of Vegetation Cover in the Urumqi River Basin

Author

Listed:
  • Azimatjan Mamattursun

    (Institute of Geography and Tourism, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi 830054, China
    Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Lake Environment and Resources in Arid Zone, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi 830054, China)

  • Han Yang

    (Institute of Geography and Tourism, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi 830054, China
    Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Lake Environment and Resources in Arid Zone, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi 830054, China)

  • Kamila Ablikim

    (Institute of Geography and Tourism, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi 830054, China
    Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Lake Environment and Resources in Arid Zone, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi 830054, China)

  • Nurbiya Obulhasan

    (School of Public Management, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China)

Abstract

It is important to determine long-term changes in vegetation cover, and the associated driving forces, to better understand the natural and human-induced factors affecting vegetation growth. We calculated the fractional vegetation coverage (FVC) of the Urumqi River basin and selected seven natural factors (the clay and sand contents of surface soils, elevation, aspect, slope, precipitation and temperature) and one human factor (land use type). We then used the Sen–Man–Kendall method to calculate the changing trend of the FVC from 2000 to 2020. We used the optimal parameters-based geographical detector (OPGD) model to quantitatively analyze the influence of each factor on the change in vegetation coverage in the basin. The FVC of the Urumqi River basin fluctuated from 2000 to 2020, with average values between 0.22 and 0.33. The areas with no and low vegetation coverage accounted for two-thirds of the total area, whereas the areas with a medium, medium–high and high FVC accounted for one-third of the total area. The upper reaches of the river basin are glacial and forest areas with no vegetation coverage and a high FVC. The middle reaches are concentrated in areas of urban construction with a medium FVC. The lower reaches are in unstable farmland with a medium and high FVC and deserts with a low FVC and no vegetation. From the perspective of the change trend, the areas with an improved FVC accounted for 62.54% of the basin, stable areas accounted for 5.66% and degraded areas accounted for 31.8%. The FVC showed an increasing trend in the study area. The improvement was mainly in the areas of urban construction and desert. Degradation occurred in the high-elevation areas, whereas the transitional zone was unchanged. The analysis of driving forces showed that the human factor explained more of the changes in the FVC than the natural factors in the order: land use type (0.244) > temperature (0.216) > elevation (0.205) > soil clay content (0.172) > precipitation (0.163) > soil sand content (0.138) > slope (0.059) > aspect (0.014). Apart from aspect, the explanatory power ( Q value) of the interaction of each factor was higher than that of the single factor. Risk detection showed that each factor had an interval in which the change in the FVC was inhibited or promoted. The optimum elevation interval of the study area was 1300–2700 m and the greatest inhibition of the FVC was seen above 3540 m. Too much or too little precipitation inhibited vegetation coverage.

Suggested Citation

  • Azimatjan Mamattursun & Han Yang & Kamila Ablikim & Nurbiya Obulhasan, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Evolution and Driving Forces of Vegetation Cover in the Urumqi River Basin," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-25, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:15323-:d:978206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/15323/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/15323/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fu, Lintao & Bo, Tianli & Du, Guozhen & Zheng, Xiaojing, 2012. "Modeling the responses of grassland vegetation coverage to grazing disturbance in an alpine meadow," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 221-232.
    2. Lei Zhang & Xinyu Peng & Ahmed Farouk, 2021. "Environmental Efficiency of Node Cities in Chinese Section of Silk Road Economic Zone and Its Influencing Factors," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-9, July.
    3. Yongxia Ding & Shouzhang Peng, 2020. "Spatiotemporal Trends and Attribution of Drought across China from 1901–2100," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiao Han & Yining Chen & Hehua Zhao, 2023. "Temporal–Spatial Evolution, Influencing Factors, and Driving Mechanisms of Environmental Regulation Performance Disparities: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-26, July.
    2. Jincai Zhao & Qianqian Liu & Heli Lu & Zheng Wang & Ke Zhang & Pan Wang, 2021. "Future droughts in China using the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI) under multi-spatial scales," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 109(1), pages 615-636, October.
    3. Chao Li & Xuemei Li & Dongliang Luo & Yi He & Fangfang Chen & Bo Zhang & Qiyong Qin, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Pattern of Vegetation Ecology Quality and Its Response to Climate Change between 2000–2017 in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-22, January.
    4. Zhen Chen & Xiaohong Gao & Zhifeng Liu & Kelong Chen, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Variation of Soil Erosion Characteristics in the Qinghai Lake Basin Based on the InVEST Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-21, March.
    5. Xuan Guo & Qingwen Min, 2023. "Analysis of Landscape Patterns Changes and Driving Factors of the Guangdong Chaoan Fenghuangdancong Tea Cultural System in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, March.
    6. Xi Kan & Xu Liu & Zhou Zhou & Yonghong Zhang & Linglong Zhu & Kenny Thiam Choy Lim Kam Sian & Qi Liu, 2023. "Analysis of Spatiotemporal Variation and Influencing Factors of PM 2.5 in China Based on Multisource Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, October.
    7. Mengyao Ci & Lu Ye & Changhao Liao & Li Yao & Zhiqin Tu & Qiao Xing & Xuguang Tang & Zhi Ding, 2023. "Long-Term Dynamics of Ecosystem Services and Their Influencing Factors in Ecologically Fragile Southwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-22, August.
    8. Monia Santini & Sergio Noce & Marco Mancini & Luca Caporaso, 2023. "A Global Multiscale SPEI Dataset under an Ensemble Approach," Data, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-14, February.
    9. Qingqing Ma & Linrong Chai & Fujiang Hou & Shenghua Chang & Yushou Ma & Atsushi Tsunekawa & Yunxiang Cheng, 2019. "Quantifying Grazing Intensity Using Remote Sensing in Alpine Meadows on Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-14, January.
    10. Anning Liang & Dongmei Yan & Jun Yan & Yayang Lu & Xiaowei Wang & Wanrong Wu, 2023. "A Comprehensive Assessment of Sustainable Development of Urbanization in Hainan Island Using Remote Sensing Products and Statistical Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, January.
    11. Huang, Wenhuan & Wang, Hailong, 2021. "Drought and intensified agriculture enhanced vegetation growth in the central Pearl River Basin of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    12. Ruixin Zhang & Yuke Zhou & Tianyang Hu & Wenbin Sun & Shuhui Zhang & Jiapei Wu & Han Wang, 2023. "Detecting the Spatiotemporal Variation of Vegetation Phenology in Northeastern China Based on MODIS NDVI and Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Dataset," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:15323-:d:978206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.