IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i17p3150-d261997.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Citizen Science Approach to Determine Physical Activity Patterns and Demographics of Greenway Users in Winston-Salem, North Carolina

Author

Listed:
  • Joshua R. Dilley

    (Department of Family and Community Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA)

  • Justin B. Moore

    (Department of Family and Community Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA
    Department of Implementation Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27101, USA
    Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27101, USA)

  • Phillip Summers

    (Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Program in Community Engagement, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27101, USA)

  • Amanda A. Price

    (Department of Exercise Physiology, Winston-Salem State University, Winston-Salem, NC 27110, USA)

  • Matthew Burczyk

    (City of Winston-Salem Department of Transportation, NC 27101, USA)

  • Lynn Byrd

    (Citizen Scientist, Winston-Salem, NC 27101, USA)

  • Patricia J. Sisson

    (Citizen Scientist, Winston-Salem, NC 27101, USA)

  • Alain G. Bertoni

    (Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27101, USA)

Abstract

Citizen science is a growing method of scientific discovery and community engagement. To date, there is a paucity of data using citizen scientists to monitor community level physical activity, such as bicycling or walking; these data are critical to inform community level intervention. Volunteers were recruited from the local community to make observations at five local greenways. The volunteers picked their location, time to collect data and duration of data collection. Volunteer observations included recording estimated age, race or ethnicity and activity level of each individual they encountered walking, running or bicycling on the greenway. A total of 102 volunteers were recruited to participate in the study, of which 60% completed one or more observations. Average observational time lasted 81 minutes and resulted in recording the demographics and physical activity of a mean of 48 people per session. The majority of adult bicyclists observed were biking at a moderate pace (86%) and were white (72%) males (62%). Similar results were observed for those walking. We demonstrate the feasibility of using citizen scientists to address the current scarcity of data describing community-level physical activity behavior patterns. Future work should focus on refining the citizen science approach for the collection of physical activity data to inform community-specific interventions in order to increase greenway use.

Suggested Citation

  • Joshua R. Dilley & Justin B. Moore & Phillip Summers & Amanda A. Price & Matthew Burczyk & Lynn Byrd & Patricia J. Sisson & Alain G. Bertoni, 2019. "A Citizen Science Approach to Determine Physical Activity Patterns and Demographics of Greenway Users in Winston-Salem, North Carolina," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-11, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:17:p:3150-:d:261997
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/17/3150/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/17/3150/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pucher, J. & Buehler, R., 2016. "Safer cycling through improved infrastructure," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 106(12), pages 2089-2091.
    2. Anthony G. Tuckett & Abbey Freeman & Sharon Hetherington & Paul A. Gardiner & Abby C. King & On behalf of Burnie Brae Citizen Scientists, 2018. "Older Adults Using Our Voice Citizen Science to Create Change in Their Neighborhood Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Megan B. Irby & Keena R. Moore & Lilli Mann-Jackson & DeWanna Hamlin & Isaiah Randall & Phillip Summers & Joseph A. Skelton & Stephanie S. Daniel & Scott D. Rhodes, 2021. "Community-Engaged Research: Common Themes and Needs Identified by Investigators and Research Teams at an Emerging Academic Learning Health System," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-14, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sagaris, Lake, 2018. "Citizen participation for sustainable transport: Lessons for change from Santiago and Temuco, Chile," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 402-410.
    2. Lukas Adam & Tim Jones & Marco Brömmelstroet, 2020. "Planning for cycling in the dispersed city: establishing a hierarchy of effectiveness of municipal cycling policies," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 503-527, April.
    3. Ali Al-Ramini & Mohammad A Takallou & Daniel P Piatkowski & Fadi Alsaleem, 2022. "Quantifying changes in bicycle volumes using crowdsourced data," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(6), pages 1612-1630, July.
    4. Belinda Paulovich & Sonja Pedell & Erica Tandori & Jeanie Beh, 2022. "Weaving Social Connectivity into the Community Fabric: Exploring Older Adult’s Relationships to Technology and Place," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-13, July.
    5. Glaser, Meredith & Krizek, Kevin J., 2021. "Can street-focused emergency response measures trigger a transition to new transport systems? Exploring evidence and lessons from 55 US cities," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 146-155.
    6. Meder, Björn & Fleischhut, Nadine & Osman, Magda, 2018. "Beyond the confines of choice architecture: A critical analysis," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 36-44.
    7. Esther Fasan & Miles Tight & Harry Evdorides, 2021. "Factors Influencing Cycling among Secondary School Adolescents in an Ethnically Diverse City: The Perspective of Birmingham Transport Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.
    8. Büchel, Beda & Marra, Alessio Daniele & Corman, Francesco, 2022. "COVID-19 as a window of opportunity for cycling: Evidence from the first wave," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 144-156.
    9. Sonja Pedell & Ann Borda & Alen Keirnan & Nicole Aimers, 2021. "Combining the Digital, Social and Physical Layer to Create Age-Friendly Cities and Communities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-14, January.
    10. Deakin, Elizabeth & Bhamidi, Vidya & Funaki, Dorry & Colani, Tasha & McCarthy, Margaret, 2018. "Women and Cycling: A Case Study of the Use of San Francisco Bike Lanes," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt6fh5p5tt, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    11. Sergio A. Useche & Francisco Alonso & Aleksey Boyko & Polina Buyvol & Irina Makarova & Gleb Parsin & Mireia Faus, 2024. "Promoting (Safe) Young-User Cycling in Russian Cities: Relationships among Riders’ Features, Cycling Behaviors and Safety-Related Incidents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-17, April.
    12. Rune Elvik, 2019. "A Transport Policy Whose Injury Impacts May Go Unnoticed: More Walking, Cycling and Use of Public Transport," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-10, September.
    13. Michael Szell, 2018. "Crowdsourced Quantification and Visualization of Urban Mobility Space Inequality," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(1), pages 1-20.
    14. Yue, Yafei & Yang, Dongfeng & Owen, Neville & Van Dyck, Delfien, 2022. "The built environment and mental health among older adults in Dalian: The mediating role of perceived environmental attributes," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    15. Andrew J. Collins & Craig A. Jordan & R. Michael Robinson & Caitlin Cornelius & Ross Gore, 2020. "Exploring good cycling cities using multivariate statistics," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 526-543, December.
    16. Marcel E Moran, 2021. "What’s your angle? Analyzing angled parking via satellite imagery to aid bike-network planning," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(7), pages 1912-1925, September.
    17. Kadia Saint-Onge & Paquito Bernard & Célia Kingsbury & Janie Houle, 2021. "Older Public Housing Tenants’ Capabilities for Physical Activity Described Using Walk-Along Interviews in Montreal, Canada," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-19, November.
    18. Teixeira, Inaian Pignatti & Rodrigues da Silva, Antônio Nélson & Schwanen, Tim & Manzato, Gustavo Garcia & Dörrzapf, Linda & Zeile, Peter & Dekoninck, Luc & Botteldooren, Dick, 2020. "Does cycling infrastructure reduce stress biomarkers in commuting cyclists? A comparison of five European cities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    19. Zain Ul-Abdin & Pieter De Winne & Hans De Backer, 2019. "Risk-Perception Formation Considering Tangible and Non-Tangible Aspects of Cycling: A Flemish Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-19, November.
    20. John Pucher & Ralph Buehler, 2017. "Cycling towards a more sustainable transport future," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(6), pages 689-694, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:17:p:3150-:d:261997. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.