IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i12p2137-d240469.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Machine Learning-Based Integration of High-Resolution Wildfire Smoke Simulations and Observations for Regional Health Impact Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Yufei Zou

    (School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA)

  • Susan M. O’Neill

    (Pacific Wildland Fire Sciences Laboratory, U.S. Forest Service, Seattle, WA 98103, USA)

  • Narasimhan K. Larkin

    (Pacific Wildland Fire Sciences Laboratory, U.S. Forest Service, Seattle, WA 98103, USA)

  • Ernesto C. Alvarado

    (School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA)

  • Robert Solomon

    (School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA)

  • Clifford Mass

    (Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA)

  • Yang Liu

    (Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA)

  • M. Talat Odman

    (School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA)

  • Huizhong Shen

    (School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA)

Abstract

Large wildfires are an increasing threat to the western U.S. In the 2017 fire season, extensive wildfires occurred across the Pacific Northwest (PNW). To evaluate public health impacts of wildfire smoke, we integrated numerical simulations and observations for regional fire events during August-September of 2017. A one-way coupled Weather Research and Forecasting and Community Multiscale Air Quality modeling system was used to simulate fire smoke transport and dispersion. To reduce modeling bias in fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) and to optimize smoke exposure estimates, we integrated modeling results with the high-resolution Multi-Angle Implementation of Atmospheric Correction satellite aerosol optical depth and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency AirNow ground-level monitoring PM 2.5 concentrations. Three machine learning-based data fusion algorithms were applied: An ordinary multi-linear regression method, a generalized boosting method, and a random forest (RF) method. 10-Fold cross-validation found improved surface PM 2.5 estimation after data integration and bias correction, especially with the RF method. Lastly, to assess transient health effects of fire smoke, we applied the optimized high-resolution PM 2.5 exposure estimate in a short-term exposure-response function. Total estimated regional mortality attributable to PM 2.5 exposure during the smoke episode was 183 (95% confidence interval: 0, 432), with 85% of the PM 2.5 pollution and 95% of the consequent multiple-cause mortality contributed by fire emissions. This application demonstrates both the profound health impacts of fire smoke over the PNW and the need for a high-performance fire smoke forecasting and reanalysis system to reduce public health risks of smoke hazards in fire-prone regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Yufei Zou & Susan M. O’Neill & Narasimhan K. Larkin & Ernesto C. Alvarado & Robert Solomon & Clifford Mass & Yang Liu & M. Talat Odman & Huizhong Shen, 2019. "Machine Learning-Based Integration of High-Resolution Wildfire Smoke Simulations and Observations for Regional Health Impact Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-20, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:12:p:2137-:d:240469
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/12/2137/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/12/2137/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michelle C. Kondo & Anneclaire J. De Roos & Lauren S. White & Warren E. Heilman & Miranda H. Mockrin & Carol Ann Gross-Davis & Igor Burstyn, 2019. "Meta-Analysis of Heterogeneity in the Effects of Wildfire Smoke Exposure on Respiratory Health in North America," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Neal Fann & Amy D. Lamson & Susan C. Anenberg & Karen Wesson & David Risley & Bryan J. Hubbell, 2012. "Estimating the National Public Health Burden Associated with Exposure to Ambient PM2.5 and Ozone," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(1), pages 81-95, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nishi Srivastava, 2020. "Association of modeled PM2.5 with aerosol optical depth: model versus satellite," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 102(2), pages 689-705, June.
    2. Nicolas Borchers-Arriagada & Andrew J. Palmer & David M.J.S. Bowman & Grant J. Williamson & Fay H. Johnston, 2020. "Health Impacts of Ambient Biomass Smoke in Tasmania, Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Shih Ying Chang & William Vizuete & Marc Serre & Lakshmi Pradeepa Vennam & Mohammad Omary & Vlad Isakov & Michael Breen & Saravanan Arunachalam, 2017. "Finely Resolved On‐Road PM2.5 and Estimated Premature Mortality in Central North Carolina," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(12), pages 2420-2434, December.
    4. Vivek Shandas & Jackson Voelkel & Meenakshi Rao & Linda George, 2016. "Integrating High-Resolution Datasets to Target Mitigation Efforts for Improving Air Quality and Public Health in Urban Neighborhoods," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, August.
    5. Claire L. Schollaert & Jihoon Jung & Joseph Wilkins & Ernesto Alvarado & Jill Baumgartner & Julien Brun & Tania Busch Isaksen & Jamie M. Lydersen & Miriam E. Marlier & Julian D. Marshall & Yuta J. Mas, 2024. "Quantifying the smoke-related public health trade-offs of forest management," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 7(2), pages 130-139, February.
    6. Meenakshi Rao & Linda A. George & Vivek Shandas & Todd N. Rosenstiel, 2017. "Assessing the Potential of Land Use Modification to Mitigate Ambient NO 2 and Its Consequences for Respiratory Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, July.
    7. Yang Yang & Liwen Luo & Chao Song & Hao Yin & Jintao Yang, 2018. "Spatiotemporal Assessment of PM 2.5 -Related Economic Losses from Health Impacts during 2014–2016 in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, June.
    8. Mao Mao & Xiaolin Zhang & Yan Yin, 2018. "Particulate Matter and Gaseous Pollutions in Three Metropolises along the Chinese Yangtze River: Situation and Implications," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-29, May.
    9. Szkop Zbigniew, 2016. "An evaluation of the ecosystem services provided by urban trees: The role of Krasiński Gardens in air quality and human health in Warsaw (Poland)," Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, Sciendo, vol. 4(4), pages 41-50, December.
    10. Lin Jia & Xiaoyi Zhou & Qingjie Wang, 2023. "Effects of Agricultural Machinery Operations on PM 2.5 , PM 10 and TSP in Farmland under Different Tillage Patterns," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, April.
    11. Anne E. Smith & Will Gans, 2015. "Enhancing the Characterization of Epistemic Uncertainties in PM2.5 Risk Analyses," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(3), pages 361-378, March.
    12. Amy J. Schulz & Graciela B. Mentz & Natalie Sampson & Melanie Ward & J. Timothy Dvonch & Ricardo De Majo & Barbara A. Israel & Angela G. Reyes & Donele Wilkins, 2018. "Independent and Joint Contributions of Fine Particulate Matter Exposure and Population Vulnerability to Mortality in the Detroit Metropolitan Area," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, June.
    13. Haiou Yang & Wenbo Chen & Zhaofeng Liang, 2017. "Impact of Land Use on PM 2.5 Pollution in a Representative City of Middle China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, April.
    14. Klingen, Joris & van Ommeren, Jos, 2020. "Urban air pollution and time losses: Evidence from cyclists in London," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    15. Louis Anthony (Tony) Cox, 2013. "Improving Causal Inferences in Risk Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(10), pages 1762-1771, October.
    16. Jorge A. Bonilla & Claudia Aravena & Ricardo Morales-Betancourt, 2023. "Assessing Multiple Inequalities and Air Pollution Abatement Policies," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 84(3), pages 695-727, March.
    17. Huang, Ching-Hsun & Bagdon, Benjamin A., 2018. "Quantifying environmental and health benefits of using woody biomass for electricity generation in the Southwestern United States," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 123-134.
    18. Raphaël Homayoun Boroumand & Stéphane Goutte & Thomas Péran & Thomas Porcher, 2019. "Worker mobility and the purchase of low CO2 emission vehicles in France: a datamining approach," European Journal of Comparative Economics, Cattaneo University (LIUC), vol. 16(2), pages 171-205, December.
    19. Marshall Burke & Sam Heft-Neal & Jessica Li & Anne Driscoll & Patrick Baylis & Matthieu Stigler & Joakim A. Weill & Jennifer A. Burney & Jeff Wen & Marissa L. Childs & Carlos F. Gould, 2022. "Exposures and behavioural responses to wildfire smoke," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(10), pages 1351-1361, October.
    20. Neal Fann & Amy D. Lamson & Susan C. Anenberg & Karen Wesson & David Risley & Bryan J. Hubbell, 2012. "Response to Cox Letter: “Miscommunicating Risk, Uncertainty, and Causation: Fine Particulate Air Pollution and Mortality Risk as an Example”," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(5), pages 768-770, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:12:p:2137-:d:240469. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.