IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jgames/v12y2021i4p88-d683045.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stackelberg Population Dynamics: A Predictive-Sensitivity Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Eduardo Mojica-Nava

    (Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota 111321, Colombia
    Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria—DEIB, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milano, Italy)

  • Fredy Ruiz

    (Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria—DEIB, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milano, Italy)

Abstract

Hierarchical decision-making processes traditionally modeled as bilevel optimization problems are widespread in modern engineering and social systems. In this work, we deal with a leader with a population of followers in a hierarchical order of play. In general, this problem can be modeled as a leader–follower Stackelberg equilibrium problem using a mathematical program with equilibrium constraints. We propose two interconnected dynamical systems to dynamically solve a bilevel optimization problem between a leader and follower population in a single time scale by a predictive-sensitivity conditioning interconnection. For the leader’s optimization problem, we developed a gradient descent algorithm based on the total derivative, and for the followers’ optimization problem, we used the population dynamics framework to model a population of interacting strategic agents. We extended the concept of the Stackelberg population equilibrium to the differential Stackelberg population equilibrium for population dynamics. Theoretical guarantees for the stability of the proposed Stackelberg population learning dynamics are presented. Finally, a distributed energy resource coordination problem is solved via pricing dynamics based on the proposed approach. Some simulation experiments are presented to illustrate the effectiveness of the framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Eduardo Mojica-Nava & Fredy Ruiz, 2021. "Stackelberg Population Dynamics: A Predictive-Sensitivity Approach," Games, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jgames:v:12:y:2021:i:4:p:88-:d:683045
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/12/4/88/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/12/4/88/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jerome Bracken & James T. McGill, 1973. "Mathematical Programs with Optimization Problems in the Constraints," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 37-44, February.
    2. T. Başar & R. Srikant, 2002. "A Stackelberg Network Game with a Large Number of Followers," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 115(3), pages 479-490, December.
    3. Kosuke Hirose & Toshihiro Matsumura, 2019. "Comparing welfare and profit in quantity and price competition within Stackelberg mixed duopolies," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 126(1), pages 75-93, January.
    4. A. J. Novak & G. Feichtinger & G. Leitmann, 2010. "A Differential Game Related to Terrorism: Nash and Stackelberg Strategies," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 144(3), pages 533-555, March.
    5. Motalleb, Mahdi & Siano, Pierluigi & Ghorbani, Reza, 2019. "Networked Stackelberg Competition in a Demand Response Market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 680-691.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marta Biancardi & Andrea Di Liddo & Giovanni Villani, 2022. "How do Fines and Their Enforcement on Counterfeit Products Affect Social Welfare?," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 60(4), pages 1547-1573, December.
    2. R. Paulavičius & C. S. Adjiman, 2020. "New bounding schemes and algorithmic options for the Branch-and-Sandwich algorithm," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 77(2), pages 197-225, June.
    3. Beck, Yasmine & Ljubić, Ivana & Schmidt, Martin, 2023. "A survey on bilevel optimization under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 401-426.
    4. Yanikoglu, I., 2014. "Robust optimization methods for chance constrained, simulation-based, and bilevel problems," Other publications TiSEM 45826f7e-6e21-481e-889e-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Lei Fang & Hecheng Li, 2013. "Lower bound of cost efficiency measure in DEA with incomplete price information," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 219-226, October.
    6. Panayides, Michalis & Knight, Vince & Harper, Paul, 2023. "A game theoretic model of the behavioural gaming that takes place at the EMS - ED interface," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(3), pages 1236-1258.
    7. Gabriel Ruiz-Garzón & Rafaela Osuna-Gómez & Antonio Rufián-Lizana & Beatriz Hernández-Jiménez, 2020. "Approximate Efficient Solutions of the Vector Optimization Problem on Hadamard Manifolds via Vector Variational Inequalities," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-19, December.
    8. Catherine C. Langlois & Jean-Pierre P. Langlois, 2011. "The Escalation of Terror: Hate and the Demise of Terrorist Organizations," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 28(5), pages 497-521, November.
    9. Changhong Deng & Ning Liang & Jin Tan & Gongchen Wang, 2016. "Multi-Objective Scheduling of Electric Vehicles in Smart Distribution Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-15, November.
    10. V. Balachandran & Edward A. Stohr, 1978. "Optimal Pricing of Computer Resources in a Competitive Environment," Discussion Papers 268, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
    11. Shuang Ma & Gang Du & Jianxin (Roger) Jiao & Ruchuan Zhang, 2016. "Hierarchical game joint optimization for product family-driven modular design," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 67(12), pages 1496-1509, December.
    12. Lu Gan & Dirong Xu & Xiuyun Chen & Pengyan Jiang & Benjamin Lev & Zongmin Li, 2023. "Sustainable portfolio re-equilibrium on wind-solar-hydro system: An integrated optimization with combined meta-heuristic," Energy & Environment, , vol. 34(5), pages 1383-1408, August.
    13. Mao, Ying & Wang, Liqing & Liu, Yang & Lu, Jianquan & Wang, Zhen, 2018. "Stabilization of evolutionary networked games with length-r information," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 337(C), pages 442-451.
    14. Michael Caputo & Chen Ling, 2015. "Intrinsic Comparative Dynamics of Locally Differentiable Feedback Stackelberg Equilibria," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-25, March.
    15. Bertrand Crettez & Naila Hayek, 2014. "Terrorists’ Eradication Versus Perpetual Terror War," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 160(2), pages 679-702, February.
    16. Basak, Debasmita & Wang, Leonard F.S., 2019. "Cournot vs. Bertrand in mixed markets with R&D," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 265-271.
    17. Rebeca Ramirez Acosta & Chathura Wanigasekara & Emilie Frost & Tobias Brandt & Sebastian Lehnhoff & Christof Büskens, 2023. "Integration of Intelligent Neighbourhood Grids to the German Distribution Grid: A Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-16, May.
    18. Ming Hsin Lin & Toshihiro Matsumura, 2018. "Optimal Privatisation Policy under Private Leadership in Mixed Oligopolies," Arthaniti: Journal of Economic Theory and Practice, , vol. 17(1), pages 1-14, June.
    19. van Hoesel, Stan, 2008. "An overview of Stackelberg pricing in networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(3), pages 1393-1402, September.
    20. Karabulut, Ezgi & Aras, Necati & Kuban Altınel, İ., 2017. "Optimal sensor deployment to increase the security of the maximal breach path in border surveillance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(1), pages 19-36.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jgames:v:12:y:2021:i:4:p:88-:d:683045. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.