IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jgames/v12y2021i3p62-d606157.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Champ versus Chump: Viewing an Opponent’s Face Engages Attention but Not Reward Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Ralph S. Redden

    (Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, 6299 South St, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada)

  • Greg A. Gagliardi

    (Neuroeconomics Laboratory, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada)

  • Chad C. Williams

    (Neuroeconomics Laboratory, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada)

  • Cameron D. Hassall

    (Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK)

  • Olave E. Krigolson

    (Neuroeconomics Laboratory, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada)

Abstract

When we play competitive games, the opponents that we face act as predictors of the outcome of the game. For instance, if you are an average chess player and you face a Grandmaster, you anticipate a loss. Framed in a reinforcement learning perspective, our opponents can be thought of as predictors of rewards and punishments. The present study investigates whether facing an opponent would be processed as a reward or punishment depending on the level of difficulty the opponent poses. Participants played Rock, Paper, Scissors against three computer opponents while electroencephalographic (EEG) data was recorded. In a key manipulation, one opponent (HARD) was programmed to win most often, another (EASY) was made to lose most often, and the third (AVERAGE) had equiprobable outcomes of wins, losses, and ties. Through practice, participants learned to anticipate the relative challenge of a game based on the opponent they were facing that round. An analysis of our EEG data revealed that winning outcomes elicited a reward positivity relative to losing outcomes. Interestingly, our analysis of the predictive cues (i.e., the opponents’ faces) demonstrated that attentional engagement (P3a) was contextually sensitive to anticipated game difficulty. As such, our results for the predictive cue are contrary to what one might expect for a reinforcement model associated with predicted reward, but rather demonstrate that the neural response to the predictive cue was encoding the level of engagement with the opponent as opposed to value relative to the anticipated outcome.

Suggested Citation

  • Ralph S. Redden & Greg A. Gagliardi & Chad C. Williams & Cameron D. Hassall & Olave E. Krigolson, 2021. "Champ versus Chump: Viewing an Opponent’s Face Engages Attention but Not Reward Systems," Games, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-12, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jgames:v:12:y:2021:i:3:p:62-:d:606157
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/12/3/62/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/12/3/62/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Treleaven-Hassard, Shiree & Gold, Joshua & Bellman, Steven & Schweda, Anika & Ciorciari, Joseph & Critchley, Christine & Varan, Duane, 2010. "Using the P3a to gauge automatic attention to interactive television advertising," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 777-784, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daugherty, Terry & Hoffman, Ernest & Kennedy, Kathleen, 2016. "Research in reverse: Ad testing using an inductive consumer neuroscience approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 3168-3176.
    2. Ahmed H. Alsharif & Nor Zafir Md Salleh & Mazilah Abdullah & Ahmad Khraiwish & Azmirul Ashaari, 2023. "Neuromarketing Tools Used in the Marketing Mix: A Systematic Literature and Future Research Agenda," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, February.
    3. Ahmed H. Alsharif & Nor Zafir Md Salleh & Rohaizat Baharun & Alharthi Rami Hashem E & Aida Azlina Mansor & Javed Ali & Alhamzah F. Abbas, 2021. "Neuroimaging Techniques in Advertising Research: Main Applications, Development, and Brain Regions and Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jgames:v:12:y:2021:i:3:p:62-:d:606157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.