IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i5p1004-d1342755.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beyond Personal Beliefs: The Impact of the Dominant Social Paradigm on Energy Transition Choices

Author

Listed:
  • Johannes Platje

    (Faculty of Finance and Management, WSB Merito University in Wrocław, ul Fabryczna 29-31, 53-609 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Katarzyna A. Kurek

    (Department of Trade and Finance, Czech University of Life Sciences, Kamýcká 129, Praha-Suchdol, 165 00 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Petra Berg

    (School of Marketing and Communication, University of Vaasa, Wolffintie 34, 65200 Vaasa, Finland)

  • Johan van Ophem

    (Urban Economics Group, Wageningen University & Research, Hollandseweg 1, 6706 KN Wageningen, The Netherlands)

  • Aniela Styś

    (Faculty of Finance and Management, WSB Merito University in Wrocław, ul Fabryczna 29-31, 53-609 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Sławomir Jankiewicz

    (Faculty of Finance and Banking, WSB Merito University in Poznań, ul. Ratajczaka 1-3, 61-813 Poznań, Poland)

Abstract

Energy transition towards a local resilient energy supply is necessary for energy security. Climate change and the threat of economic collapse are reasons to force society to become less dependent on fossil fuel. Small-scale solutions are expected to be more sustainable, as large-scale integrated networks are featured by complexity and difficult-to-notice vulnerabilities, creating system risks. This paper presents the results of empirical research among a sample of Polish business students ( N = 205) on the importance of worldviews for the choice of the energy transition scenario (local solutions vs. large-scale solutions). Worldviews are represented here by the Dominant Social Paradigm (defined for the purpose of this study as the belief that liberal democracy, free markets, and technological development are to solve all type of problems). This study addresses two research questions: (1) Is there a difference in preference for the energy transition scenarios? (2) Does adherence to the Dominant Social Paradigm determine the choice of the scenario for energy transition? The results present a preference for non-cooperative solutions (individual household solutions and large-scale solutions), while no significant relation to the worldviews represented by the Dominant Social Paradigm has been found. The results suggest that preferences for individual and large-scale solutions may be influenced more by institutional factors than by personal worldviews. A policy implication is that a change in the socio-political institutions and strengthening local governance may be a prerequisite for a sustainable energy transition.

Suggested Citation

  • Johannes Platje & Katarzyna A. Kurek & Petra Berg & Johan van Ophem & Aniela Styś & Sławomir Jankiewicz, 2024. "Beyond Personal Beliefs: The Impact of the Dominant Social Paradigm on Energy Transition Choices," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-15, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:5:p:1004-:d:1342755
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/5/1004/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/5/1004/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johannes (Joost) Platje & Markus Will & Monika Paradowska & Ynte K. van Dam, 2022. "Socioeconomic Paradigms and the Perception of System Risks: A Study of Attitudes towards Nuclear Power among Polish Business Students," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Kilbourne, William E. & Beckmann, Suzanne C. & Thelen, Eva, 2002. "The role of the dominant social paradigm in environmental attitudes: a multinational examination," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 193-204, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jun Guan Neoh & Maxwell Chipulu & Alasdair Marshall, 2017. "What encourages people to carpool? An evaluation of factors with meta-analysis," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 423-447, March.
    2. Salzberger, Thomas & Koller, Monika, 2013. "Towards a new paradigm of measurement in marketing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1307-1317.
    3. Stamatios Ntanos & Grigorios Kyriakopoulos & Michalis Skordoulis & Miltiadis Chalikias & Garyfallos Arabatzis, 2019. "An Application of the New Environmental Paradigm (NEP) Scale in a Greek Context," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, January.
    4. Grimmer, Martin & Miles, Morgan P. & Polonsky, Michael Jay & Vocino, Andrea, 2015. "The effectiveness of life-cycle pricing for consumer durables," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 1602-1606.
    5. Marco Guerci & Annachiara Longoni & Davide Luzzini, 2016. "Translating stakeholder pressures into environmental performance – the mediating role of green HRM practices," Post-Print hal-01251759, HAL.
    6. Yu‐Xiang Yen, 2018. "Buyer–supplier collaboration in green practices: The driving effects from stakeholders," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1666-1678, December.
    7. Diego A. Vazquez & Catherine Liston‐Heyes, 2008. "Corporate discourse and environmental performance in Argentina," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(3), pages 179-193, March.
    8. Yan Xu & Aijun Liu & Zengxian Li & Jiaxin Li & Jiamin Xiong & Peng Fan, 2023. "Review of Green Supply-Chain Management Diffusion in the Context of Energy Transformation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-16, January.
    9. Low, Brian & Tang, Yiming & Medhekar, Milind, 2012. "Green power electricity, public policy and disjointed incrementalism," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(6), pages 802-806.
    10. Christian Omobhude & ShihHsin Chen, 2020. "Institutional process for infrastructural development in Nigeria," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 20(3), pages 223-242, July.
    11. J. K. Eastman & P. Modi & S. Gordon-Wilson, 2020. "The Impact of Future Time Perspective and Personality on the Sustainable Behaviours of Seniors," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 275-294, June.
    12. Vishal Gupta, 2021. "Validating the theory of planned behavior in green purchasing behavior," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(10), pages 1-19, October.
    13. Glover, J.L. & Champion, D. & Daniels, K.J. & Dainty, A.J.D., 2014. "An Institutional Theory perspective on sustainable practices across the dairy supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 102-111.
    14. Victoria-Sophie Osburg & Iain Davies & Vignesh Yoganathan & Fraser McLeay, 2021. "Perspectives, Opportunities and Tensions in Ethical and Sustainable Luxury: Introduction to the Thematic Symposium," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(2), pages 201-210, March.
    15. Font, Xavier & Garay, Lluis & Jones, Steve, 2016. "A Social Cognitive Theory of sustainability empathy," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 65-80.
    16. Huff, Aimee Dinnin & Barnhart, Michelle, 2022. "UNRAVEL-ing gnarly knots: A path for researching market-entangled wicked social problems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 717-727.
    17. Melea Press, 2021. "Developing a strong sustainability research program in marketing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(1), pages 96-114, June.
    18. Papadas, Karolos-Konstantinos & Avlonitis, George J. & Carrigan, Marylyn, 2017. "Green marketing orientation: Conceptualization, scale development and validation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 236-246.
    19. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Kester, Johannes & Noel, Lance & de Rubens, Gerardo Zarazua, 2019. "Income, political affiliation, urbanism and geography in stated preferences for electric vehicles (EVs) and vehicle-to-grid (V2G) technologies in Northern Europe," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 214-229.
    20. Driessen, P.H., 2005. "Green product innovation strategy," Other publications TiSEM f14c1bcc-f1bf-4637-b4a6-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:5:p:1004-:d:1342755. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.