IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i23p9066-d988895.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Thermodynamic Environmental and Economic Analyses of Combined Cycles Using Air and Supercritical CO 2 in the Bottoming Cycles for Power Generation by Gas Turbine Waste Heat Recovery

Author

Listed:
  • Faiza Brahimi

    (Département de Génie Mécanique, Faculté de Technologie, Université M’hamed Bougara, Boumerdes 35000, Algeria
    Laboratoire Dynamique des Moteurs et Vibro-acoustique, Université M’hamed Bougara, Boumerdes 35000, Algeria)

  • Baya Madani

    (Département de Génie Mécanique, Faculté de Technologie, Université M’hamed Bougara, Boumerdes 35000, Algeria
    Laboratoire d’Energétique Mécanique et Matériaux, Université Mouloud Mammeri, Tizi-Ouzou 15000, Algeria)

  • Messaouda Ghemmadi

    (Département de Génie Mécanique, Faculté de Technologie, Université M’hamed Bougara, Boumerdes 35000, Algeria
    Laboratoire d’Energétique Mécanique et Matériaux, Université Mouloud Mammeri, Tizi-Ouzou 15000, Algeria)

Abstract

This study aims to improve existing fossil gas turbine power plants by waste heat recovery. These power plants function with an air simple cycle (ASC) and are implemented where water resources are limited. Modeling and simulation of ASC and two advanced energy conversion systems are performed. They are the gas turbine–air bottoming cycle (GT-ABC) and gas turbine–supercritical carbon dioxide bottoming cycle (GT-sc-CO 2 BC). The main intent is to assess the benefits of employing sc-CO 2 as a working fluid in a closed Brayton bottoming cycle compared to air, based on the energetic and exergetic performance and economic and environmental impact. Analyses of ASC, GT-ABC, and GT-sc-CO 2 BC are performed for various topping gas turbine powers: large (plant 1); medium (plant 2); and low (plant 3). The results of the energetic and exergetic analyses indicate that there is a significant improvement in the output power (ranging from 22% to 25%); and energy and exergy efficiencies of GT-ABC and GT-sc-CO 2 BC (up to 8% and 11%, respectively) compared to that of ASC. To provide better insight into the behavior of these technologies and achieve their better integration, we investigate the influence of varying the bottoming compressor pressure ratio, the ambient temperature, and the gas flow rate in the bottoming cycle. The results of the environmental and economic analyses show that the amount of CO 2 emissions in GT-sc-CO 2 BC is reduced by 10% more than in GT ABC. The results also show that GT-ABC improves the NPV between 17.69% and 30% but GT-sc-CO 2 BC improves it even more, between 25.79% and 33.30%.

Suggested Citation

  • Faiza Brahimi & Baya Madani & Messaouda Ghemmadi, 2022. "Comparative Thermodynamic Environmental and Economic Analyses of Combined Cycles Using Air and Supercritical CO 2 in the Bottoming Cycles for Power Generation by Gas Turbine Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-21, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:23:p:9066-:d:988895
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/23/9066/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/23/9066/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pham, H.S. & Alpy, N. & Ferrasse, J.H. & Boutin, O. & Quenaut, J. & Tothill, M. & Haubensack, D. & Saez, M., 2015. "Mapping of the thermodynamic performance of the supercritical CO2 cycle and optimisation for a small modular reactor and a sodium-cooled fast reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 412-424.
    2. Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2012. "Integrated assessment of IGCC power generation technology with carbon capture and storage (CCS)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 434-445.
    3. Zhu, Sipeng & Deng, Kangyao & Qu, Shuan, 2013. "Energy and exergy analyses of a bottoming Rankine cycle for engine exhaust heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 448-457.
    4. Vaja, Iacopo & Gambarotta, Agostino, 2010. "Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) bottoming with Organic Rankine Cycles (ORCs)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 1084-1093.
    5. Kim, Min Seok & Ahn, Yoonhan & Kim, Beomjoo & Lee, Jeong Ik, 2016. "Study on the supercritical CO2 power cycles for landfill gas firing gas turbine bottoming cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 893-909.
    6. Le Moullec, Yann, 2013. "Conceptual study of a high efficiency coal-fired power plant with CO2 capture using a supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 32-46.
    7. Padilla, Ricardo Vasquez & Soo Too, Yen Chean & Benito, Regano & Stein, Wes, 2015. "Exergetic analysis of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles integrated with solar central receivers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 348-365.
    8. Weber, Céline & Favrat, Daniel, 2010. "Conventional and advanced CO2 based district energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 5070-5081.
    9. He, Maogang & Zhang, Xinxin & Zeng, Ke & Gao, Ke, 2011. "A combined thermodynamic cycle used for waste heat recovery of internal combustion engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 6821-6829.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ma, Yuegeng & Liu, Ming & Yan, Junjie & Liu, Jiping, 2017. "Thermodynamic study of main compression intercooling effects on supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 746-756.
    2. Olumayegun, Olumide & Wang, Meihong & Oko, Eni, 2019. "Thermodynamic performance evaluation of supercritical CO2 closed Brayton cycles for coal-fired power generation with solvent-based CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1074-1088.
    3. Crespi, Francesco & Gavagnin, Giacomo & Sánchez, David & Martínez, Gonzalo S., 2017. "Supercritical carbon dioxide cycles for power generation: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 152-183.
    4. Hanak, Dawid P. & Manovic, Vasilije, 2016. "Calcium looping with supercritical CO2 cycle for decarbonisation of coal-fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 343-353.
    5. Park, Joo Hyun & Park, Hyun Sun & Kwon, Jin Gyu & Kim, Tae Ho & Kim, Moo Hwan, 2018. "Optimization and thermodynamic analysis of supercritical CO2 Brayton recompression cycle for various small modular reactors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 520-535.
    6. Liu, Yaping & Wang, Ying & Huang, Diangui, 2019. "Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle: A state-of-the-art review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    7. Khallaghi, Navid & Hanak, Dawid P. & Manovic, Vasilije, 2019. "Gas-fired chemical looping combustion with supercritical CO2 cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C), pages 237-244.
    8. Guo, Jiangfeng, 2016. "Design analysis of supercritical carbon dioxide recuperator," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 21-27.
    9. Bai, Wengang & Li, Hongzhi & Zhang, Xuwei & Qiao, Yongqiang & Zhang, Chun & Gao, Wei & Yao, Mingyu, 2022. "Thermodynamic analysis of CO2–SF6 mixture working fluid supercritical Brayton cycle used for solar power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    10. Zhou, Jing & Zhu, Meng & Su, Sheng & Chen, Lei & Xu, Jun & Hu, Song & Wang, Yi & Jiang, Long & Zhong, Wenqi & Xiang, Jun, 2020. "Numerical analysis and modified thermodynamic calculation methods for the furnace in the 1000 MW supercritical CO2 coal-fired boiler," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    11. Kim, Min Seok & Ahn, Yoonhan & Kim, Beomjoo & Lee, Jeong Ik, 2016. "Study on the supercritical CO2 power cycles for landfill gas firing gas turbine bottoming cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 893-909.
    12. Domingues, António & Santos, Helder & Costa, Mário, 2013. "Analysis of vehicle exhaust waste heat recovery potential using a Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 71-85.
    13. Wang, Kun & He, Ya-Ling & Zhu, Han-Hui, 2017. "Integration between supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles and molten salt solar power towers: A review and a comprehensive comparison of different cycle layouts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 819-836.
    14. Lecompte, S. & Huisseune, H. & van den Broek, M. & De Paepe, M., 2015. "Methodical thermodynamic analysis and regression models of organic Rankine cycle architectures for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 60-76.
    15. Choi, Byung Chul & Kim, Young Min, 2013. "Thermodynamic analysis of a dual loop heat recovery system with trilateral cycle applied to exhaust gases of internal combustion engine for propulsion of the 6800 TEU container ship," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 404-416.
    16. Al-Sulaiman, Fahad A. & Dincer, Ibrahim & Hamdullahpur, Feridun, 2012. "Energy and exergy analyses of a biomass trigeneration system using an organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 975-985.
    17. Pezzuolo, Alex & Benato, Alberto & Stoppato, Anna & Mirandola, Alberto, 2016. "The ORC-PD: A versatile tool for fluid selection and Organic Rankine Cycle unit design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 605-620.
    18. Son, Seongmin & Jeong, Yongju & Cho, Seong Kuk & Lee, Jeong Ik, 2020. "Development of supercritical CO2 turbomachinery off-design model using 1D mean-line method and Deep Neural Network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    19. S. Mohammad S. Mahmoudi & Ata D. Akbari & Marc A. Rosen, 2016. "Thermoeconomic Analysis and Optimization of a New Combined Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Recompression Brayton/Kalina Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-19, October.
    20. Sarabchi, N. & Khoshbakhti Saray, R. & Mahmoudi, S.M.S., 2013. "Utilization of waste heat from a HCCI (homogeneous charge compression ignition) engine in a tri-generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 965-976.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:23:p:9066-:d:988895. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.