IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2021i1p153-d711955.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reusing Flowback and Produced Water with Different Salinity to Prepare Guar Fracturing Fluid

Author

Listed:
  • Erdong Yao

    (Unconventional Petroleum Research Institute, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
    State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China)

  • Hang Xu

    (Unconventional Petroleum Research Institute, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
    State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China)

  • Yuan Li

    (Unconventional Petroleum Research Institute, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
    State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China)

  • Xuesong Ren

    (Unconventional Petroleum Research Institute, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China)

  • Hao Bai

    (Unconventional Petroleum Research Institute, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
    State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China)

  • Fujian Zhou

    (Unconventional Petroleum Research Institute, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
    State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China)

Abstract

Economical and environmental concerns have forced the oil and gas industry to consider reusing flowback and produced water for fracturing operations. The major challenge is that the high-salinity of flowback water usually prevents its compatibility with several fracturing fluid additives. In this paper, the authors explored an economic and effective method to prepare guar fracturing fluids with different salinity waters. The main research idea was to use chelating agents to mask metal ions, such as calcium and magnesium, that are harmful to crosslinking. Firstly, a complexometric titration test was conducted to measure the chelating ability of three chelating agents. Secondly, through viscosity, crosslinking, and hanging tests, it was verified that the complex masking method could cope with the problem of high-valence metal ions affecting crosslinking. Thirdly, the preferred chelating agent was mixed with several other additives, including thickeners, crosslinkers, and pH regulators, to prepare the novel guar fracturing fluid. The comprehensive performances of the novel fluid system were tested such as temperature and shear resistance, friction reduction, gel-breaking performance, and core damage rate. The results show that the organophosphate chelating agent (i.e., CA-5) had the greatest ability to chelate calcium and magnesium ions. There was a good linear relationship between the dosage of CA-5 and the total molar concentration of calcium and magnesium ions in brine water. The main mechanism was that the chelating agent formed a complex with calcium and magnesium ions at a chelation ratio of 1:5. The test results of the comprehensive performance evaluation indicate that the prepared guar fracturing fluid met the requirements for field application, and the lower the salinity of the flowback water, the more it is economical and effective.

Suggested Citation

  • Erdong Yao & Hang Xu & Yuan Li & Xuesong Ren & Hao Bai & Fujian Zhou, 2021. "Reusing Flowback and Produced Water with Different Salinity to Prepare Guar Fracturing Fluid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2021:i:1:p:153-:d:711955
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/1/153/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/1/153/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Yongge & Hou, Jian & Zhao, Haifeng & Liu, Xiaoyu & Xia, Zhizeng, 2018. "A method to recover natural gas hydrates with geothermal energy conveyed by CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 265-278.
    2. Muhammad Shahzad Kamal & Marwan Mohammed & Mohamed Mahmoud & Salaheldin Elkatatny, 2018. "Development of Chelating Agent-Based Polymeric Gel System for Hydraulic Fracturing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, June.
    3. Wang, Wenyang & Pang, Xiongqi & Chen, Zhangxin & Chen, Dongxia & Zheng, Tianyu & Luo, Bing & Li, Jing & Yu, Rui, 2019. "Quantitative prediction of oil and gas prospects of the Sinian-Lower Paleozoic in the Sichuan Basin in central China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 861-872.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Xiaolin & Zhang, Fengyuan & Lipiński, Wojciech, 2020. "Research progress and challenges in hydrate-based carbon dioxide capture applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    2. Wan, Kun & Wu, Tian-Wei & Wang, Yi & Li, Xiao-Sen & Liu, Jian-Wu & Kou, Xuan & Feng, Jing-Chun, 2023. "Large-scale experimental study of heterogeneity in different types of hydrate reservoirs by horizontal well depressurization method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    3. Sun, Fengrui & Yao, Yuedong & Li, Guozhen & Li, Xiangfang, 2018. "Geothermal energy extraction in CO2 rich basin using abandoned horizontal wells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 760-773.
    4. Liu, Yongge & Hou, Jian & Chen, Zhangxin & Bai, Yajie & Su, Haiyang & Zhao, Ermeng & Li, Guangming, 2021. "Enhancing hot water flooding in hydrate bearing layers through a novel staged production method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    5. Cheng Cao & Hejuan Liu & Zhengmeng Hou & Faisal Mehmood & Jianxing Liao & Wentao Feng, 2020. "A Review of CO 2 Storage in View of Safety and Cost-Effectiveness," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-45, January.
    6. Li, Jiawei & Yuan, Wanju & Zhang, Yin & Cherubini, Claudia & Scheuermann, Alexander & Galindo Torres, Sergio Andres & Li, Ling, 2020. "Numerical investigations of CO2 and N2 miscible flow as the working fluid in enhanced geothermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    7. Olfati, Mohammad & Bahiraei, Mehdi & Veysi, Farzad, 2019. "A novel modification on preheating process of natural gas in pressure reduction stations to improve energy consumption, exergy destruction and CO2 emission: Preheating based on real demand," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 598-609.
    8. Dong, Lin & Li, Yanlong & Wu, Nengyou & Wan, Yizhao & Liao, Hualin & Wang, Huajian & Zhang, Yajuan & Ji, Yunkai & Hu, Gaowei & Leonenko, Yuri, 2023. "Numerical simulation of gas extraction performance from hydrate reservoirs using double-well systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    9. Hao, Yongmao & Liang, Jikai & Zhan, Shiyuan & Fan, Mingwu & Wang, Jiandong & Li, Shuxia & Yang, Fan & Yang, Shiwei & Wang, Chuanming, 2022. "Dynamic analysis on edge of sand detachment of natural gas hydrate reservoir," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PB).
    10. Liu, Yongge & Li, Guo & Chen, Jing & Bai, Yajie & Hou, Jian & Xu, Hongzhi & Zhao, Ermeng & Chen, Zhangxin & He, Jiayuan & Zhang, Le & Cen, Xueqi & Chuvilin, Evgeny, 2023. "Numerical simulation of hydraulic fracturing-assisted depressurization development in hydrate bearing layers based on discrete fracture models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    11. Li, Jing & Wu, Keliu & Chen, Zhangxin & Wang, Wenyang & Yang, Bin & Wang, Kun & Luo, Jia & Yu, Renjie, 2019. "Effects of energetic heterogeneity on gas adsorption and gas storage in geologic shale systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    12. Cui, Guodong & Wang, Yi & Rui, Zhenhua & Chen, Bailian & Ren, Shaoran & Zhang, Liang, 2018. "Assessing the combined influence of fluid-rock interactions on reservoir properties and injectivity during CO2 storage in saline aquifers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 281-296.
    13. Lu, Nu & Hou, Jian & Liu, Yongge & Barrufet, Maria A. & Ji, Yunkai & Xia, Zhizeng & Xu, Boyue, 2018. "Stage analysis and production evaluation for class III gas hydrate deposit by depressurization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 501-511.
    14. Yu, Lu & Zhang, Liang & Zhang, Rui & Ren, Shaoran, 2018. "Assessment of natural gas production from hydrate-bearing sediments with unconsolidated argillaceous siltstones via a controlled sandout method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 654-667.
    15. Liu, Yongge & Liu, Xiaoyu & Hou, Jian & Li, Huazhou Andy & Liu, Yueliang & Chen, Zhangxin, 2019. "Technical and economic feasibility of a novel heavy oil recovery method: Geothermal energy assisted heavy oil recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 853-867.
    16. Zhao, Ermeng & Hou, Jian & Liu, Yongge & Ji, Yunkai & Liu, Wenbin & Lu, Nu & Bai, Yajie, 2020. "Enhanced gas production by forming artificial impermeable barriers from unconfined hydrate deposits in Shenhu area of South China sea," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    17. Cui, Guodong & Ning, Fulong & Dou, Bin & Li, Tong & Zhou, Qiucheng, 2022. "Particle migration and formation damage during geothermal exploitation from weakly consolidated sandstone reservoirs via water and CO2 recycling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    18. Bai, Yajie & Hou, Jian & Liu, Yongge & Lu, Nu & Zhao, Ermeng & Ji, Yunkai, 2020. "Interbed patterns division and its effect on production performance for class I hydrate deposit with mudstone interbed," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    19. Wang, Wenyang & Pang, Xiongqi & Chen, Zhangxin & Chen, Dongxia & Ma, Xinhua & Zhu, Weiping & Zheng, Tianyu & Wu, Keliu & Zhang, Kun & Ma, Kuiyou, 2020. "Improved methods for determining effective sandstone reservoirs and evaluating hydrocarbon enrichment in petroliferous basins," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    20. Bjørn Kvamme & Jinzhou Zhao & Na Wei & Wantong Sun & Navid Saeidi & Jun Pei & Tatiana Kuznetsova, 2020. "Hydrate Production Philosophy and Thermodynamic Calculations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-34, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2021:i:1:p:153-:d:711955. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.