IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i16p5174-d618972.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of CO 2 to Cure Steel Slag and Gypsum-Based Material

Author

Listed:
  • Xue Wang

    (School of Civil and Resource Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
    Key Laboratory of Resource-Oriented Treatment of Industrial Pollutants, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Wen Ni

    (School of Civil and Resource Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
    Key Laboratory of Resource-Oriented Treatment of Industrial Pollutants, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Jiajie Li

    (School of Civil and Resource Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
    Key Laboratory of Resource-Oriented Treatment of Industrial Pollutants, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Siqi Zhang

    (School of Civil and Resource Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
    Key Laboratory of Resource-Oriented Treatment of Industrial Pollutants, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Keqing Li

    (School of Civil and Resource Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
    Key Laboratory of Resource-Oriented Treatment of Industrial Pollutants, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Wentao Hu

    (School of Civil and Resource Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
    Key Laboratory of Resource-Oriented Treatment of Industrial Pollutants, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

To improve the utilization of steel slag (SS) in CO 2 capture and making building materials, the paper mainly discussed the effects of desulphurization gypsum (DG) and w/s ratio on strength development and CO 2 capture capability of high Al content SS. It showed that 10 wt% DG enhanced the strength of hydration-curing SS by 262% at 28 days. Similarly, adding 6 wt% DG in carbonation-curing SS contributed to increases in strength and CO 2 uptake by 283% and 33.54%, reaching 42.68 MPa and 19.12%, respectively. Strength decreases and CO 2 uptake increases with w/s. Microanalysis (QXRD, SEM-EDS, TG-DTG, FTIR, XPS, and MIP) revealed that the main hydration products of SS were C-S-H gel and C 4 AH 13 , which transformed to ettringite with DG addition. The carbonation products were mainly calcite and aragonite. Additionally, the amount of aragonite, mechanically weaker than calcite, decreased and calcite increased significantly when DG was added in carbonation-curing samples, providing a denser structure and higher strength than those without DG. Furthermore, high Al 2p binding energies revealed the formation of monocarboaluminate in the DG-added carbonation samples, corresponding to higher CO 2 uptake. This study provides guidance for the preparation of SS-DG carbide building materials.

Suggested Citation

  • Xue Wang & Wen Ni & Jiajie Li & Siqi Zhang & Keqing Li & Wentao Hu, 2021. "Use of CO 2 to Cure Steel Slag and Gypsum-Based Material," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-15, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:16:p:5174-:d:618972
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/16/5174/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/16/5174/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michel den Elzen & Malte Meinshausen, 2006. "Meeting the EU 2°C climate target: global and regional emission implications," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(5), pages 545-564, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fander Falconí & Rafael Burbano & Jesus Ramos-Martin, 2015. "De activos tóxicos a ingreso tóxico," Documentos de Trabajo CEPROEC 2015_07, Instituto de Altos Estudios Nacionales, Centro de Prospectiva Estratégica.
    2. den Elzen, Michel & Höhne, Niklas & van Vliet, Jasper, 2009. "Analysing comparable greenhouse gas mitigation efforts for Annex I countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 4114-4131, October.
    3. Zhou, P. & Wang, M., 2016. "Carbon dioxide emissions allocation: A review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 47-59.
    4. Fander Falconí & Rafael Burbano & Jesus Ramos-Martin & Pedro Cango, 2019. "Toxic Income as a Trigger of Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-25, April.
    5. Wachsmuth, Jakob & Denishchenkova, Alexandra & Fekete, Hanna & Parra, Paola & Schaeffer, Michiel & Ancygier, Andrzej & Sferra, Fabio, 2019. "Fairness- and cost-effectiveness-based approaches to effort-sharing under the Paris agreement," Working Papers "Sustainability and Innovation" S04/2019, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    6. van Ruijven, Bas J. & Weitzel, Matthias & den Elzen, Michel G.J. & Hof, Andries F. & van Vuuren, Detlef P. & Peterson, Sonja & Narita, Daiju, 2012. "Emission allowances and mitigation costs of China and India resulting from different effort-sharing approaches," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 116-134.
    7. Meng Xu & Zhongfeng Qin & Yigang Wei, 2023. "Exploring the financing and allocating schemes for the Chinese Green Climate Fund," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 2487-2508, March.
    8. Timilsina, Govinda R., 2012. "Economic implications of moving toward global convergence on emission intensities," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6115, The World Bank.
    9. Asbjørn Torvanger & Alv-Arne Grimstad & Erik Lindeberg & Nathan Rive & Kristin Rypdal & Ragnhild Skeie & Jan Fuglestvedt & Petter Tollefsen, 2012. "Quality of geological CO 2 storage to avoid jeopardizing climate targets," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 114(2), pages 245-260, September.
    10. van Vuuren, Detlef P. & den Elzen, Michel G.J. & van Vliet, Jasper & Kram, Tom & Lucas, Paul & Isaac, Morna, 2009. "Comparison of different climate regimes: the impact of broadening participation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(12), pages 5351-5362, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:16:p:5174-:d:618972. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.