IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i7p1660-d340737.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamics of Large Scale Turbulence in Finite-Sized Wind Farm Canopy Using Proper Orthogonal Decomposition and a Novel Fourier-POD Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Tanmoy Chatterjee

    (General Electric Company (GE Global Research), Niskayuna, NY 12309, USA)

  • Yulia T. Peet

    (Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA)

Abstract

Large scale coherent structures in the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) are known to contribute to the power generation in wind farms. In order to understand the dynamics of large scale structures, we perform proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) analysis of a finite sized wind turbine array canopy in the current paper. The POD analysis sheds light on the dynamics of large scale coherent modes as well as on the scaling of the eigenspectra in the heterogeneous wind farm. We also propose adapting a novel Fourier-POD (FPOD) modal decomposition which performs POD analysis of spanwise Fourier-transformed velocity. The FPOD methodology helps us in decoupling the length scales in the spanwise and streamwise direction when studying the 3D energetic coherent modes. Additionally, the FPOD eigenspectra also provide deeper insights for understanding the scaling trends of the three-dimensional POD eigenspectra and its convergence, which is inherently tied to turbulent dynamics. Understanding the behaviour of large scale structures in wind farm flows would not only help better assess reduced order models (ROM) for forecasting the flow and power generation but would also play a vital role in improving the decision making abilities in wind farm optimization algorithms in future. Additionally, this study also provides guidance for better understanding of the POD analysis in the turbulence and wind farm community.

Suggested Citation

  • Tanmoy Chatterjee & Yulia T. Peet, 2020. "Dynamics of Large Scale Turbulence in Finite-Sized Wind Farm Canopy Using Proper Orthogonal Decomposition and a Novel Fourier-POD Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-25, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:7:p:1660-:d:340737
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/7/1660/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/7/1660/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hayat, Imran & Chatterjee, Tanmoy & Liu, Huiwen & Peet, Yulia T. & Chamorro, Leonardo P., 2019. "Exploring wind farms with alternating two- and three-bladed wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 764-774.
    2. Leonardo P. Chamorro & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2011. "Turbulent Flow Inside and Above a Wind Farm: A Wind-Tunnel Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 4(11), pages 1-21, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mattuella, J.M.L. & Loredo-Souza, A.M. & Oliveira, M.G.K. & Petry, A.P., 2016. "Wind tunnel experimental analysis of a complex terrain micrositing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 110-119.
    2. Kale, Baris & Buckingham, Sophia & van Beeck, Jeroen & Cuerva-Tejero, Alvaro, 2023. "Comparison of the wake characteristics and aerodynamic response of a wind turbine under varying atmospheric conditions using WRF-LES-GAD and WRF-LES-GAL wind turbine models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    3. Yaqing Jin & Huiwen Liu & Rajan Aggarwal & Arvind Singh & Leonardo P. Chamorro, 2016. "Effects of Freestream Turbulence in a Model Wind Turbine Wake," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-12, October.
    4. Sun, Haiying & Gao, Xiaoxia & Yang, Hongxing, 2020. "A review of full-scale wind-field measurements of the wind-turbine wake effect and a measurement of the wake-interaction effect," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    5. Sun, Haiying & Yang, Hongxing, 2020. "Numerical investigation of the average wind speed of a single wind turbine and development of a novel three-dimensional multiple wind turbine wake model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 192-203.
    6. Majid Bastankhah & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2017. "A New Miniature Wind Turbine for Wind Tunnel Experiments. Part I: Design and Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    7. Jae-ho Jeong & Kwangtae Ha, 2020. "Evaluation of Wind Flow Characteristics by RANS-Based Numerical Site Calibration (NSC) Method with Met-Tower Measurements and Its Application to a Complex Terrain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-16, October.
    8. Hayat, Imran & Chatterjee, Tanmoy & Liu, Huiwen & Peet, Yulia T. & Chamorro, Leonardo P., 2019. "Exploring wind farms with alternating two- and three-bladed wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 764-774.
    9. Karina Soto-Rivas & David Richter & Cristian Escauriaza, 2019. "A Formulation of the Thrust Coefficient for Representing Finite-Sized Farms of Tidal Energy Converters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.
    10. C. A. Lopez-Villalobos & O. Rodriguez-Hernandez & R. Campos-Amezcua & Guillermo Hernandez-Cruz & O. A. Jaramillo & J. L. Mendoza, 2018. "Wind Turbulence Intensity at La Ventosa, Mexico: A Comparative Study with the IEC61400 Standards," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, November.
    11. Dai, Xuan & Xu, Da & Zhang, Mengqi & Stevens, Richard J.A.M., 2022. "A three-dimensional dynamic mode decomposition analysis of wind farm flow aerodynamics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 608-624.
    12. He, Ruiyang & Sun, Haiying & Gao, Xiaoxia & Yang, Hongxing, 2022. "Wind tunnel tests for wind turbines: A state-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    13. Böhme, Gustavo S. & Fadigas, Eliane A. & Gimenes, André L.V. & Tassinari, Carlos E.M., 2018. "Wake effect measurement in complex terrain - A case study in Brazilian wind farms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 277-283.
    14. Liang, Xiaoling & Fu, Shifeng & Cai, Fulin & Han, Xingxing & Zhu, Weijun & Yang, Hua & Shen, Wenzhong, 2023. "Experimental investigation on wake characteristics of wind turbine and a new two-dimensional wake model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 373-381.
    15. Kumer, Valerie-M. & Reuder, Joachim & Dorninger, Manfred & Zauner, Rudolf & Grubišić, Vanda, 2016. "Turbulent kinetic energy estimates from profiling wind LiDAR measurements and their potential for wind energy applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 898-910.
    16. Zhaobin Li & Xiaohao Liu & Xiaolei Yang, 2022. "Review of Turbine Parameterization Models for Large-Eddy Simulation of Wind Turbine Wakes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-28, September.
    17. Zhang, Baoshou & Song, Baowei & Mao, Zhaoyong & Tian, Wenlong, 2017. "A novel wake energy reuse method to optimize the layout for Savonius-type vertical axis wind turbines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 341-355.
    18. Newman, A. Jensen & Cal, Raúl Bayoán & Castillo, Luciano, 2015. "Blade number effects in a scaled down wind farm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 472-481.
    19. Pankaj K. Jha & Earl P. N. Duque & Jessica L. Bashioum & Sven Schmitz, 2015. "Unraveling the Mysteries of Turbulence Transport in a Wind Farm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-29, June.
    20. Rockel, Stanislav & Peinke, Joachim & Hölling, Michael & Cal, Raúl Bayoán, 2016. "Wake to wake interaction of floating wind turbine models in free pitch motion: An eddy viscosity and mixing length approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 666-676.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:7:p:1660-:d:340737. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.