IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i13p3442-d379895.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Local Market for TSO and DSO Reactive Power Provision Using DSO Grid Resources

Author

Listed:
  • Fábio Retorta

    (INESC TEC—Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
    Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • João Aguiar

    (INESC TEC—Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • Igor Rezende

    (INESC TEC—Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
    Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • José Villar

    (INESC TEC—Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • Bernardo Silva

    (INESC TEC—Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

This paper proposes a near to real-time local market to provide reactive power to the transmission system operator (TSO), using the resources connected to a distribution grid managed by a distribution system operator (DSO). The TSO publishes a requested reactive power profile at the TSO-DSO interface for each time-interval of the next delivery period, so that market agents (managing resources of the distribution grid) can prepare and send their bids accordingly. DSO resources are the first to be mobilized, and the remaining residual reactive power is supplied by the reactive power flexibility offered in the local reactive market. Complex bids (with non-curtailability conditions) are supported to provide flexible ways of bidding fewer flexible assets (such as capacitor banks). An alternating current (AC) optimal power flow (OPF) is used to clear the bids by maximizing the social welfare to supply the TSO required reactive power profile, subject to the DSO grid constraints. A rolling window mechanism allows a continuous dispatching of reactive power, and the possibility of adapting assigned schedules to real time constraints. A simplified TSO-DSO cost assignment of the flexible reactive power used is proposed to share for settlement purposes.

Suggested Citation

  • Fábio Retorta & João Aguiar & Igor Rezende & José Villar & Bernardo Silva, 2020. "Local Market for TSO and DSO Reactive Power Provision Using DSO Grid Resources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:13:p:3442-:d:379895
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/13/3442/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/13/3442/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohsen Khorasany & Donald Azuatalam & Robert Glasgow & Ariel Liebman & Reza Razzaghi, 2020. "Transactive Energy Market for Energy Management in Microgrids: The Monash Microgrid Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Kargarian, A. & Raoofat, M. & Mohammadi, M., 2011. "Reactive power market management considering voltage control area reserve and system security," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 3832-3840.
    3. Pol Olivella-Rosell & Pau Lloret-Gallego & Íngrid Munné-Collado & Roberto Villafafila-Robles & Andreas Sumper & Stig Ødegaard Ottessen & Jayaprakash Rajasekharan & Bernt A. Bremdal, 2018. "Local Flexibility Market Design for Aggregators Providing Multiple Flexibility Services at Distribution Network Level," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karim L. Anaya & Michael G. Pollitt, 2021. "How to Procure Flexibility Services within the Electricity Distribution System: Lessons from an International Review of Innovation Projects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-26, July.
    2. Pedro Faria & Zita Vale, 2022. "Realistic Load Modeling for Efficient Consumption Management Using Real-Time Simulation and Power Hardware-in-the-Loop," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Younes Zahraoui & Ibrahim Alhamrouni & Saad Mekhilef & M. Reyasudin Basir Khan & Mehdi Seyedmahmoudian & Alex Stojcevski & Ben Horan, 2021. "Energy Management System in Microgrids: A Comprehensive Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-33, September.
    4. Bielecki, Sławomir & Skoczkowski, Tadeusz, 2018. "An enhanced concept of Q-power management," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 335-353.
    5. Pavlos S. Georgilakis, 2020. "Review of Computational Intelligence Methods for Local Energy Markets at the Power Distribution Level to Facilitate the Integration of Distributed Energy Resources: State-of-the-art and Future Researc," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-37, January.
    6. Edoardo De Din & Fabian Bigalke & Marco Pau & Ferdinanda Ponci & Antonello Monti, 2021. "Analysis of a Multi-Timescale Framework for the Voltage Control of Active Distribution Grids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, April.
    7. Aguado, José A. & Paredes, Ángel, 2023. "Coordinated and decentralized trading of flexibility products in Inter-DSO Local Electricity Markets via ADMM," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 337(C).
    8. Isaías Gomes & Rui Melicio & Victor M. F. Mendes, 2021. "Assessing the Value of Demand Response in Microgrids," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, May.
    9. Nemanja Mišljenović & Matej Žnidarec & Goran Knežević & Damir Šljivac & Andreas Sumper, 2023. "A Review of Energy Management Systems and Organizational Structures of Prosumers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-32, March.
    10. Marina Bertolini & Gregorio Morosinotto, 2023. "Business Models for Energy Community in the Aggregator Perspective: State of the Art and Research Gaps," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-26, June.
    11. Mario Tovar & Miguel Robles & Felipe Rashid, 2020. "PV Power Prediction, Using CNN-LSTM Hybrid Neural Network Model. Case of Study: Temixco-Morelos, México," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Gourisetti, Sri Nikhil Gupta & Sebastian-Cardenas, D. Jonathan & Bhattarai, Bishnu & Wang, Peng & Widergren, Steve & Borkum, Mark & Randall, Alysha, 2021. "Blockchain smart contract reference framework and program logic architecture for transactive energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    13. Darren Sharp & Rob Raven, 2021. "Urban Planning by Experiment at Precinct Scale: Embracing Complexity, Ambiguity, and Multiplicity," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 195-207.
    14. Jay, Devika & Swarup, K.S., 2021. "A comprehensive survey on reactive power ancillary service markets," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    15. Nayeem Rahman & Rodrigo Rabetino & Arto Rajala & Jukka Partanen, 2021. "Ushering in a New Dawn: Demand-Side Local Flexibility Platform Governance and Design in the Finnish Energy Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, July.
    16. Gonzalez Venegas, Felipe & Petit, Marc & Perez, Yannick, 2021. "Active integration of electric vehicles into distribution grids: Barriers and frameworks for flexibility services," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    17. Emrah Öztürk & Klaus Rheinberger & Timm Faulwasser & Karl Worthmann & Markus Preißinger, 2022. "Aggregation of Demand-Side Flexibilities: A Comparative Study of Approximation Algorithms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-25, March.
    18. Sousa, Tiago & Morais, Hugo & Vale, Zita & Castro, Rui, 2015. "A multi-objective optimization of the active and reactive resource scheduling at a distribution level in a smart grid context," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 236-250.
    19. Juan Sebastian Roncancio & José Vuelvas & Diego Patino & Carlos Adrián Correa-Flórez, 2022. "Flower Greenhouse Energy Management to Offer Local Flexibility Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, June.
    20. Bogdan-Constantin Neagu & Ovidiu Ivanov & Gheorghe Grigoras & Mihai Gavrilas & Dumitru-Marcel Istrate, 2020. "New Market Model with Social and Commercial Tiers for Improved Prosumer Trading in Microgrids," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-43, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:13:p:3442-:d:379895. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.