IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jcltec/v6y2024i1p6-92d1320037.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Innovative Multi-Objective Rescheduling System for Mitigating Pandemic Spread in Aviation Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Yujie Yuan

    (School of Air Traffic Management, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China
    School of Traffic and Transportation, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
    Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Brunel University London, London UB8 3PH, UK)

  • Yantao Wang

    (School of Air Traffic Management, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China)

  • Xiushan Jiang

    (School of Traffic and Transportation, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Chun Sing Lai

    (Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Brunel University London, London UB8 3PH, UK
    School of Automation, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China)

Abstract

The novel coronavirus outbreak has significantly heightened environmental costs and operational challenges for civil aviation airlines, prompting emergency airport closures in affected regions and a substantial decline in ridership. The consequential need to reassess, delay, or cancel flight itineraries has led to disruptions at airports, amplifying the risk of disease transmission. In response, this paper proposes a spatial approach to efficiently address pandemic spread in the civil aviation network. The methodology prioritizes the use of a static gravity model for calculating route-specific infection pressures, enabling strategic flight rescheduling to control infection levels at airports (nodes) and among airlines (edges). Temporally, this study considers intervals between takeoffs and landings to minimize crowd gatherings, mitigating the novel coronavirus transmission rate. By constructing a discrete space–time network for irregular flights, this research generates a viable set of routes for aircraft operating in special circumstances, minimizing both route-specific infection pressures and operational costs for airlines. Remarkably, the introduced method demonstrates substantial savings, reaching almost 53.4%, compared to traditional plans. This showcases its efficacy in optimizing responses to pandemic-induced disruptions within the civil aviation network, offering a comprehensive solution that balances operational efficiency and public health considerations in the face of unprecedented challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Yujie Yuan & Yantao Wang & Xiushan Jiang & Chun Sing Lai, 2024. "An Innovative Multi-Objective Rescheduling System for Mitigating Pandemic Spread in Aviation Networks," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-16, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jcltec:v:6:y:2024:i:1:p:6-92:d:1320037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8797/6/1/6/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8797/6/1/6/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abdelghany, Khaled F. & Abdelghany, Ahmed F. & Ekollu, Goutham, 2008. "An integrated decision support tool for airlines schedule recovery during irregular operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(2), pages 825-848, March.
    2. Deyi Mou & Wanlin Zhao, 2013. "An Irregular Flight Scheduling Model and Algorithm under the Uncertainty Theory," Journal of Applied Mathematics, Hindawi, vol. 2013, pages 1-8, September.
    3. Kirsi Spoof-Tuomi & Seppo Niemi, 2020. "Environmental and Economic Evaluation of Fuel Choices for Short Sea Shipping," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-19, January.
    4. Kohl, Niklas & Larsen, Allan & Larsen, Jesper & Ross, Alex & Tiourine, Sergey, 2007. "Airline disruption management—Perspectives, experiences and outlook," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 149-162.
    5. B. T. Grenfell & O. N. Bjørnstad & J. Kappey, 2001. "Travelling waves and spatial hierarchies in measles epidemics," Nature, Nature, vol. 414(6865), pages 716-723, December.
    6. Du, Wen-Bo & Zhang, Ming-Yuan & Zhang, Yu & Cao, Xian-Bin & Zhang, Jun, 2018. "Delay causality network in air transport systems," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 466-476.
    7. Abdi, M. Reza & Sharma, Sanjay, 2008. "Information system for flight disruption management," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 136-144.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khaled, Oumaima & Minoux, Michel & Mousseau, Vincent & Michel, Stéphane & Ceugniet, Xavier, 2018. "A multi-criteria repair/recovery framework for the tail assignment problem in airlines," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 137-151.
    2. Sato, Keisuke & Fukumura, Naoto, 2012. "Real-time freight locomotive rescheduling and uncovered train detection during disruption," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(3), pages 636-648.
    3. Naz Yeti̇moğlu, Yücel & Selim Aktürk, M., 2021. "Aircraft and passenger recovery during an aircraft’s unexpected unavailability," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    4. Voltes-Dorta, Augusto & Rodríguez-Déniz, Héctor & Suau-Sanchez, Pere, 2017. "Vulnerability of the European air transport network to major airport closures from the perspective of passenger delays: Ranking the most critical airports," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 119-145.
    5. Voltes-Dorta, Augusto & Rodríguez-Déniz, Héctor & Suau-Sanchez, Pere, 2017. "Passenger recovery after an airport closure at tourist destinations: A case study of Palma de Mallorca airport," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 449-466.
    6. Bouarfa, Soufiane & Müller, Jasper & Blom, Henk, 2018. "Evaluation of a Multi-Agent System approach to airline disruption management," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 108-118.
    7. Stephen J. Maher, 2016. "Solving the Integrated Airline Recovery Problem Using Column-and-Row Generation," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 216-239, February.
    8. Yuhe Shi & Zhenggang He, 2018. "Decision Analysis of Disturbance Management in the Process of Medical Supplies Transportation after Natural Disasters," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, August.
    9. Cumelles, Joel & Lordan, Oriol & Sallan, Jose M., 2021. "Cascading failures in airport networks," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    10. Nicola Bellomo & Richard Bingham & Mark A.J. Chaplain & Giovanni Dosi & Guido Forni & Damian A. Knopoff & John Lowengrub & Reidun Twarock & Maria Enrica Virgillito, 2020. "A multi-scale model of virus pandemic: Heterogeneous interactive entities in a globally connected world," LEM Papers Series 2020/16, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    11. Pedro Jose Gudiel Pineda & Chao-Che Hsu & James J. H. Liou & Huai-Wei Lo, 2018. "A Hybrid Model for Aircraft Type Determination Following Flight Cancellation," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(04), pages 1147-1172, July.
    12. Borgonjon, Tessa & Maenhout, Broos, 2022. "An exact approach for the personnel task rescheduling problem with task retiming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(2), pages 465-484.
    13. Chryssi Giannitsarou & Stephen Kissler & Flavio Toxvaerd, 2021. "Waning Immunity and the Second Wave: Some Projections for SARS-CoV-2," American Economic Review: Insights, American Economic Association, vol. 3(3), pages 321-338, September.
    14. Jon D. Petersen & Gustaf Sölveling & John-Paul Clarke & Ellis L. Johnson & Sergey Shebalov, 2012. "An Optimization Approach to Airline Integrated Recovery," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(4), pages 482-500, November.
    15. Suresh, R. & Senthilkumar, D.V. & Lakshmanan, M. & Kurths, J., 2016. "Emergence of a common generalized synchronization manifold in network motifs of structurally different time-delay systems," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 235-245.
    16. Brouer, Berit D. & Dirksen, Jakob & Pisinger, David & Plum, Christian E.M. & Vaaben, Bo, 2013. "The Vessel Schedule Recovery Problem (VSRP) – A MIP model for handling disruptions in liner shipping," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(2), pages 362-374.
    17. Jonas Ingels & Broos Maenhout, 2018. "The impact of overtime as a time-based proactive scheduling and reactive allocation strategy on the robustness of a personnel shift roster," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 143-165, April.
    18. Obrad Babić & Milica Kalić & Goran Pavković & Slavica Dožić & Mirjana Čangalović, 2010. "Heuristic approach to the airline schedule disturbances problem," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3), pages 257-280, February.
    19. Hu, Ping & Fan, Wen-Li, 2020. "Mitigation strategy against cascading failures considering vulnerable transmission line in power grid," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 540(C).
    20. Yu, Bin & Guo, Zhen & Asian, Sobhan & Wang, Huaizhu & Chen, Gang, 2019. "Flight delay prediction for commercial air transport: A deep learning approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 203-221.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jcltec:v:6:y:2024:i:1:p:6-92:d:1320037. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.