IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i5p1084-d1150514.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advances in Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Grazing on Grassland Ecosystems in China

Author

Listed:
  • Xuemin Gong

    (State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Yijia Wang

    (State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Tianyu Zhan

    (State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Chenxu Wang

    (State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Changjia Li

    (State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Yanxu Liu

    (State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

Abstract

Grassland ecosystems are among the largest terrestrial ecosystems in China, and grazing, as an important grassland management method, has direct and indirect impacts on grassland ecosystems. Meta-analyses can be used to systematically evaluate and summarize multiple findings from existing studies, but there have been few comparisons of meta-analysis methods. In this review, we summarize the effects of grazing on grassland plants and soil in the existing meta-analysis studies in China from 38 meta-analysis papers. The results show that they have consistent conclusions, such as grazing reduces the aboveground biomass by approximately half, increases the soil pH, decreases the C:N:P ratio, and reduces the number of topsoil microorganisms, but the conclusions of light and moderate grazing index changes vary greatly from study to study. The belowground biomass was generally found to increase, but it slightly decreased in some cases, and the total biomass generally decreased, but it slightly increased in other cases. Vegetation coverage increased during moderate grazing; the soil moisture content was highest for light grazing, and microbial diversity increased at light to moderate levels of grazing. There are also very inconsistent conclusions due to the different datasets and quantities of samples used in meta-analysis studies, as well as variations in the types and scales of grassland areas. The ranges of changes in other indicators were large, especially for the root-shoot ratio and soil carbon. However, changes in the aboveground biomass were generally stable. We suggest subsequent meta-analyses of grazing should further clarify the classification of grassland types and compare conclusions at different scales. Additionally, standardized network analyses are recommended for field manipulation experiments to further improve the accuracy of meta-analysis and reduce the temporal and spatial limitations of existing data.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuemin Gong & Yijia Wang & Tianyu Zhan & Chenxu Wang & Changjia Li & Yanxu Liu, 2023. "Advances in Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Grazing on Grassland Ecosystems in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:5:p:1084-:d:1150514
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/5/1084/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/5/1084/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liang Yan & Guangsheng Zhou & Feng Zhang, 2013. "Effects of Different Grazing Intensities on Grassland Production in China: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Xiang Liu & Haiyan Sheng & Zhaoqi Wang & Zhiwen Ma & Xiaotao Huang & Lanhai Li, 2020. "Does Grazing Exclusion Improve Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Stocks in Alpine Grasslands on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau? A Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-13, January.
    3. Schägner, Jan Philipp & Brander, Luke & Paracchini, Maria Luisa & Maes, Joachim & Gollnow, Florian & Bertzky, Bastian, 2018. "Spatial dimensions of recreational ecosystem service values: A review of meta-analyses and a combination of meta-analytic value-transfer and GIS," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PC), pages 395-409.
    4. Liming Lai & Sandeep Kumar, 2020. "A global meta-analysis of livestock grazing impacts on soil properties," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-17, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lei Lei & Jiahua Zheng & Shaoyu Li & Lishan Yang & Wenqiong Wang & Feng Zhang & Bin Zhang, 2023. "Soil Hydrological Properties’ Response to Long-Term Grazing on a Desert Steppe in Inner Mongolia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-11, November.
    2. Gaohuan Liu & Zhonghe Zhao, 2018. "Analysis of Carbon Storage and Its Contributing Factors—A Case Study in the Loess Plateau (China)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Henghui Xi & Wanglai Cui & Li Cai & Mengyuan Chen & Chenglei Xu, 2021. "Evaluation and Prediction of Ecosystem Service Value in the Zhoushan Islands Based on LUCC," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-13, February.
    4. Zhiwen Ma & Wenping Qin & Zhaoqi Wang & Chenglong Han & Xiang Liu & Xiaotao Huang, 2022. "A Meta-Analysis of Soil Organic Carbon Response to Livestock Grazing in Grassland of the Tibetan Plateau," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, October.
    5. Lavorel, Sandra & Rey, Pierre-Louis & Grigulis, Karl & Zawada, Mégane & Byczek, Coline, 2020. "Interactions between outdoor recreation and iconic terrestrial vertebrates in two French alpine national parks," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    6. Ing-Marie Gren & Geoffrey Kerr, 2022. "A Meta-Regression Analysis of Hunters’ Valuations of Recreational Hunting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Stoeckl, Natalie & Dodd, Aaron & Kompas, Tom, 2023. "The monetary value of 16 services protected by the Australian National Biosecurity System: Spatially explicit estimates and vulnerability to incursions," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    8. Hu, Yuanning & Huang, Jikun & Hou, Lingling, 2019. "Impacts of the Grassland Ecological Compensation Policy on Household Livestock Production in China: An Empirical Study in Inner Mongolia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 248-256.
    9. Goretti Silva & Alexandra Correia & Susana Rachão & Alcina Nunes & Elvira Vieira & Sónia Santos & Luís Soares & Manuel Fonseca & Fernanda A. Ferreira & Cláudia Miranda Veloso & Paulo Carrança & Paula , 2021. "A Methodology for the Identification and Assessment of the Conditions for the Practice of Outdoor and Sport Tourism-Related Activities: The Case of Northern Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-16, June.
    10. Leah L. Bremer & Neil Nathan & Clay Trauernicht & Puaʻala Pascua & Nicholas Krueger & Jordan Jokiel & Jayme Barton & Gretchen C. Daily, 2021. "Maintaining the Many Societal Benefits of Rangelands: The Case of Hawaiʻi," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-30, July.
    11. Robert Huber & Robert Finger, 2020. "A Meta‐analysis of the Willingness to Pay for Cultural Services from Grasslands in Europe," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(2), pages 357-383, June.
    12. Byrne, Anne T. & Hadrich, Joleen C. & Robinson, Brian E. & Han, Guodong, 2020. "A factor-income approach to estimating grassland protection subsidy payments to livestock herders in Inner Mongolia, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    13. Michael Aide & Indi Braden & Susan Murray & Collin Schabbing & Sophia Scott & Samantha Siemers & Sven Svenson & Julie Weathers, 2021. "Optimizing Beef Cow-Calf Grazing across Missouri with an Emphasis on Protecting Ecosystem Services," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-12, October.
    14. Hua Cheng & Baocheng Jin & Kai Luo & Jiuying Pei & Xueli Zhang & Yonghong Zhang & Jiaqi Tang & Qin Yang & Guojun Sun, 2021. "Vegetation Response to Goats Grazing Intensity in Semiarid Hilly Grassland of the Loess Plateau, Lanzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, March.
    15. Stoeckl, Natalie & Condie, Scott & Anthony, Ken, 2021. "Assessing changes to ecosystem service values at large geographic scale: A case study for Australia’s Great Barrier Reef," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    16. Gang Li & Zhi Zhang & Linlu Shi & Yan Zhou & Meng Yang & Jiaxi Cao & Shuhong Wu & Guangchun Lei, 2018. "Effects of Different Grazing Intensities on Soil C, N, and P in an Alpine Meadow on the Qinghai—Tibetan Plateau, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-16, November.
    17. Qingqing Ma & Linrong Chai & Fujiang Hou & Shenghua Chang & Yushou Ma & Atsushi Tsunekawa & Yunxiang Cheng, 2019. "Quantifying Grazing Intensity Using Remote Sensing in Alpine Meadows on Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-14, January.
    18. Meki, Manyowa N. & Osorio-Leyton, Javier & Steglich, Evelyn M. & Kiniry, Jim R. & Propato, Marco & Winchell, Mike & Rathjens, Hendrik & Angerer, Jay P. & Norfleet, Lee M., 2023. "Plant parameterization and APEXgraze model calibration and validation for US land resource region H grazing lands," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    19. Breyne, Johanna & Dufrêne, Marc & Maréchal, Kevin, 2021. "How integrating 'socio-cultural values' into ecosystem services evaluations can give meaning to value indicators," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    20. Li, Dongqing & Hou, Lingling & Zuo, Alec, 2021. "Informal institutions and grassland protection: Empirical evidence from pastoral regions in China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:5:p:1084-:d:1150514. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.