IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i4p487-d783644.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Barley-Based Cropping Systems and Weed Control Strategies Influence Weed Infestation, Soil Properties and Barley Productivity

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Naeem

    (Department of Agronomy, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan)

  • Waqas Ahmed Minhas

    (Department of Agronomy, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan)

  • Shahid Hussain

    (Department of Soil Science, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan)

  • Sami Ul-Allah

    (College of Agriculture, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Bahadur Sub-Campus, Layyah 31200, Pakistan)

  • Muhammad Farooq

    (Department of Plant Sciences, College of Agricultural and Marine Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Al-Khoud 123, Oman)

  • Shahid Farooq

    (Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Harran University, Şanlıurfa 63050, Turkey)

  • Mubshar Hussain

    (Department of Agronomy, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan
    School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia)

Abstract

Barley-based cropping systems (BCS) alter barley production by influencing weed infestation rates and soil nutrient dynamics. This two-year field study evaluated the interactive effects of five BCS and five weed control strategies (WCS) on soil properties and the growth and yield of barley. Barley was planted in five different cropping systems, i.e., fallow-barley (FB), maize-barley (MaB), cotton-barley (CB), mungbean-barley (MuB) and sorghum-barley (SB). Similarly, five different WCS, weed-free (control, WF), weedy-check (control, WC), false seedbeds (FS), chemical control (CC) and use of allelopathic water extracts (AWE), were included in the study. The SB system had the highest soil bulk density (1.48 and 1.47 g cm −3 during the period 2017–2018 and 2018–2019, respectively) and lowest total soil porosity (41.40 and 41.07% during the period 2017–2018 and 2018–2019, respectively). However, WCS remained non-significant for bulk density and total soil porosity during both years of the study. Barley with WF had a higher leaf area index (5.28 and 4.75) and specific leaf area (65.5 and 64.9 cm −2 g −1 ) compared with barley grown under WC. The MuB system under WC had the highest values of extractable NH 4 -N (5.42 and 5.58 mg kg −1 ), NO 3 -N (5.79 and 5.93 mg kg −1 ), P (19.9 and 19.5 mg kg −1 ), and K (195.6 and 194.3 mg kg −1 ) with statistically similar NO 3 -N in the MaB system under WC and extractable K in the MuB system under FS. Grain yield ranged between 2.8–3.2 and 2.9–3.3 t ha −1 during the period 2017–2018 and 2018–2019, respectively, among different WCS. Similarly, grain yield ranged between 2.9–3.2 and 3.0–3.2 t ha −1 during the period 2017–2018 and 2018–2019, respectively, within different BCS. Among WCS, the highest grain yield (3.29 and 3.32 t ha −1 ) along with yield-related traits of barley were in WF as compared to WC. Overall, MuB system recorded better yield and yield-related traits, whereas the lowest values of these traits were recorded for FB systems. In conclusion, the MuB system with WF improved soil characteristics and barley yield over other cropping systems. The AWE significantly suppressed weeds and was equally effective as the chemical control. Therefore, MuB and AWE could be used to improve barley productivity and suppress weeds infestation.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Naeem & Waqas Ahmed Minhas & Shahid Hussain & Sami Ul-Allah & Muhammad Farooq & Shahid Farooq & Mubshar Hussain, 2022. "Barley-Based Cropping Systems and Weed Control Strategies Influence Weed Infestation, Soil Properties and Barley Productivity," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:487-:d:783644
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/4/487/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/4/487/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Samuel I. Haruna & Nsalambi V. Nkongolo, 2019. "Tillage, Cover Crop and Crop Rotation Effects on Selected Soil Chemical Properties," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-11, May.
    2. de Moura, Maíse Soares & Silva, Bruno Montoani & Mota, Paula Karen & Borghi, Emerson & Resende, Alvaro Vilela de & Acuña-Guzman, Salvador Francisco & Araújo, Gabriela Soares Santos & da Silva, Lucas d, 2021. "Soil management and diverse crop rotation can mitigate early-stage no-till compaction and improve least limiting water range in a Ferralsol," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mubshar Hussain & Sami Ul-Allah & Shahid Farooq, 2023. "Integrated Crop Management in Sustainable Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-3, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beniaich, Adnane & Guimarães, Danielle Vieira & Avanzi, Junior Cesar & Silva, Bruno Montoani & Acuña-Guzman, Salvador Francisco & dos Santos, Wharley Pereira & Silva, Marx Leandro Naves, 2023. "Spontaneous vegetation as an alternative to cover crops in olive orchards reduces water erosion and improves soil physical properties under tropical conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    2. Mustapha El Janati & Nouraya Akkal-Corfini & Ahmed Bouaziz & Abdallah Oukarroum & Paul Robin & Ahmed Sabri & Mohamed Chikhaoui & Zahra Thomas, 2021. "Benefits of Circular Agriculture for Cropping Systems and Soil Fertility in Oases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Samuel I. Haruna & Nsalambi V. Nkongolo, 2020. "Influence of Cover Crop, Tillage, and Crop Rotation Management on Soil Nutrients," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, June.
    4. Fábio Prataviera & Aline Martineli Batista & Edwin M. M. Ortega & Gauss M. Cordeiro & Bruno Montoani Silva, 2023. "The Logit Exponentiated Power Exponential Regression with Applications," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 713-735, June.
    5. Ruan, Renjie & Zhang, Zhongbin & Wang, Yuekai & Guo, Zichun & Zhou, Hu & Tu, Renfeng & Hua, Keke & Wang, Daozhong & Peng, Xinhua, 2022. "Long-term straw rather than manure additions improved least limiting water range in a Vertisol," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:487-:d:783644. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.