IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v11y2021i10p1022-d659653.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Soil Biology Quality in Organically and Conventionally Managed Agro-Ecosystems Using Microarthropods

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina Mantoni

    (Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, Via Vetoio, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy)

  • Marika Pellegrini

    (Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, Via Vetoio, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy)

  • Leonardo Dapporto

    (Department of Biology, University of Florence, Via Madonna del Piano 6, 50019 Firenze, Italy)

  • Maria Maddalena Del Gallo

    (Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, Via Vetoio, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy)

  • Loretta Pace

    (Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, Via Vetoio, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy)

  • Donato Silveri

    (Regione Abruzzo, Ufficio Attività Culturali di Sulmona e Castel di Sangro—Centro Regionale Beni Culturali, Via Passolanciano 75, 65124 Pescara, Italy)

  • Simone Fattorini

    (Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, Via Vetoio, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy)

Abstract

Since management practices profoundly influence soil characteristics, the adoption of sustainable agro-ecological practices is essential for soil health conservation. We compared soil health in organic and conventional fields in the Abruzzi region (central Italy) by using (1) the soil biology quality (QBS) index (which expresses the level of specialisation in soil environment shown by microarthropods) and (2) microarthropod diversity expressed by Hill numbers. QBS values were calculated using both the original formulation based on only presence/absence data and a new abundance-based version. We found that organic management improves soil biology quality, which encourages the use of organic farming to maintain soil health. Including arthropod abundance in QBS calculation does not change the main outcomes, which supports the use of its original, speedier formulation. We also found that agricultural fields included in protected areas had greater soil health, which shows the importance of the matrix in determining agricultural soil health and highlights the importance of land protection in preserving biodiversity even in managed soils. Finally, we found that soil biology quality and microarthropod community structure are distinctly influenced by certain physical and chemical characteristics of the soil, which supports the use of microarthropods as biological indicators.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina Mantoni & Marika Pellegrini & Leonardo Dapporto & Maria Maddalena Del Gallo & Loretta Pace & Donato Silveri & Simone Fattorini, 2021. "Comparison of Soil Biology Quality in Organically and Conventionally Managed Agro-Ecosystems Using Microarthropods," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:10:p:1022-:d:659653
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/10/1022/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/10/1022/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas W. Culliney, 2013. "Role of Arthropods in Maintaining Soil Fertility," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-31, September.
    2. Caprio, Enrico & Nervo, Beatrice & Isaia, Marco & Allegro, Gianni & Rolando, Antonio, 2015. "Organic versus conventional systems in viticulture: Comparative effects on spiders and carabids in vineyards and adjacent forests," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 61-69.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Romero, Pascual & Navarro, Josefa María & Ordaz, Pablo Botía, 2022. "Towards a sustainable viticulture: The combination of deficit irrigation strategies and agroecological practices in Mediterranean vineyards. A review and update," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    2. Fátima Gonçalves & Cristina Carlos & Luís Crespo & Vera Zina & Amália Oliveira & Juliana Salvação & José Alberto Pereira & Laura Torres, 2021. "Soil Arthropods in the Douro Demarcated Region Vineyards: General Characteristics and Ecosystem Services Provided," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-35, July.
    3. Chertov, Oleg & Komarov, Alexander & Shaw, Cindy & Bykhovets, Sergey & Frolov, Pavel & Shanin, Vladimir & Grabarnik, Pavel & Priputina, Irina & Zubkova, Elena & Shashkov, Maxim, 2017. "Romul_Hum—A model of soil organic matter formation coupling with soil biota activity. II. Parameterisation of the soil food web biota activity," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 345(C), pages 125-139.
    4. Natalia Rosas-Ramos & Josep D. Asís & Marta Goula & Iván Ballester-Torres & Laura Baños-Picón, 2022. "Linear Landscape Elements and Heteropteran Assemblages within Mediterranean Vineyard Agroecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Veronica Sanda Chedea & Ana-Maria Drăgulinescu & Liliana Lucia Tomoiagă & Cristina Bălăceanu & Maria Lucia Iliescu, 2021. "Climate Change and Internet of Things Technologies—Sustainable Premises of Extending the Culture of the Amurg Cultivar in Transylvania—A Use Case for Târnave Vineyard," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-28, July.
    6. A. Taraqqi-A-Kamal & Christopher J. Atkinson & Aimal Khan & Kaikai Zhang & Peng Sun & Sharmin Akther & Yanrong Zhang, 2021. "Biochar remediation of soil: linking biochar production with function in heavy metal contaminated soils," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(4), pages 183-201.
    7. Filippo Frizzi & Lorenzo Tucci & Lorenzo Ottonetti & Alberto Masoni & Giacomo Santini, 2021. "Day-Night and Inter-Habitat Variations in Ant Assemblages in a Mosaic Agroforestry Landscape," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-14, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:10:p:1022-:d:659653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.