IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gai/recdev/recdev-2016-7-696.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Anti-Turkish Embargo”: Who Lost The Most?

Author

Listed:
  • Shagaida Natalia

    (Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy)

Abstract

The ongoing ban on Turkish vegetables is hardly no ceable for the Russian citizens due to insignificant volumes of supplies. During the summer months, demand for this type of product will be met by domestic production and shipments from the EAEU partners – Armenia, Kazakhstan, and Kirgizia. The ban on shipments of tomatoes and cucumbers has produced diff erent results for Turkey. Exports of tomatoes as long-lived commodity were redirected to other countries. The producers of cucumbers have suffered considerable losses: exports have fallen by 40% (Russia’s share in Turkish export cons tuted 50%).

Suggested Citation

  • Shagaida Natalia, 2016. "“Anti-Turkish Embargo”: Who Lost The Most?," Russian Economic Development, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, issue 7, pages 36-42, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gai:recdev:recdev-2016-7-696
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iep.ru/files/RePEc/gai/recdev/recdev-2016-7-696.pdf
    File Function: Revised version, 2016
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural Industry; Russian Economy;

    JEL classification:

    • Q14 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Finance
    • Q15 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Land Ownership and Tenure; Land Reform; Land Use; Irrigation; Agriculture and Environment
    • Q16 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - R&D; Agricultural Technology; Biofuels; Agricultural Extension Services

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gai:recdev:recdev-2016-7-696. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Olga Beloborodova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gaidaru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.