IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fst/rfsisf/v13y2022i13p155-164.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative analysis of the National Rural Development Programme 2014-2020 between Romania and Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriela Dalila Stoica

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Maria Cristina Sterie

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Andreea Daniela Giuca

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Carmen-Elena Dobrota

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

The National Rural Development Programme (NRDP) is a programme of the European Union and the Romanian Government to provide free funds for the economic and social development of rural Romania. The purpose of this study is to highlight the situation of Romania compared to Poland, both Member States of the European Union, in terms of financial allocation of the national rural development program in the period 2014-2020. To achieve this goal, the financial statements on the allocation of NRDP for both states were analyzed, including the number of applications submitted and payments completed for the main sub-measures financed by NRDP. The NRDP has a strong impact on agricultural production in rural areas and, therefore, in addition to financing the development and modernisation of agricultural production and rural infrastructure, the European Fund has contributed to improving the quality of life of rural populations by creating new jobs. For measure 4.1, Poland implemented projects worth €2.23 billion, or 52.6% of the total allocation for the measure, and Romania implemented projects worth €0.677 billion, or 42.3% of the total allocation. In terms of the number of farms in 2016, Romania registered 3.4 million farms and a workforce of 6 million employees on farms, double the number of Poland (1.4 million farms and 3 million employees on farms).

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriela Dalila Stoica & Maria Cristina Sterie & Andreea Daniela Giuca & Carmen-Elena Dobrota, 2022. "Comparative analysis of the National Rural Development Programme 2014-2020 between Romania and Poland," Journal of Financial Studies, Institute of Financial Studies, vol. 13(7), pages 155-164, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:fst:rfsisf:v:13:y:2022:i:13:p:155-164
    DOI: 10.55654/JFS.2022.7.13.12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revista.isfin.ro/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/12.-Stoica-Dalila.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://revista.isfin.ro/2022/11/07/comparative-analysis-of-the-national-rural-development-programme-2014-2020-between-romania-and-poland/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.55654/JFS.2022.7.13.12?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    European funds; NRDP; Romania; Poland.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q13 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Markets and Marketing; Cooperatives; Agribusiness
    • P25 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - Urban, Rural, and Regional Economics
    • R15 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Econometric and Input-Output Models; Other Methods

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fst:rfsisf:v:13:y:2022:i:13:p:155-164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cosmin Catalin Olteanu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isfinro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.