IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fan/mesame/vhtml10.3280-mesa2017-103005.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge Management e modelli strategici in sanit?. Una review strutturata della letteratura

Author

Listed:
  • FIASO Federazione Asl e Ospedali

Abstract

Le aziende sanitarie stanno fronteggiandoun tema fondamentale: erogareservizi quantitativamente e qualitativamentesempre migliori a fronte dirisorse decrescenti. Gli studi di PublicManagement hanno da tempo vistonella generazione di valore pubblicouna possibile soluzione a questo problema,ma recentemente hanno contribuitoa questo dibattito anche glistudiosi di Business Model nell?intentodi fondere assieme elementi di teoria edi pratica. A tal scopo, ben si addiconoi risultati delle ricerche sul KnowledgeManagement, che stanno progressivamenteridisegnando i modi di concepirela produzione e offrire i servizi.Questo paper si colloca in tale contestoper verificare, attraverso una revisionestrutturata della letteratura, l?esistenzae la disseminazione di frameworkad hoc per le aziende sanitare,che possano risultare utili nelle sceltestrategiche delle aziende sanitarie. Irisultati della ricerca mostrano chemolto rimane ancora da fare: gli studioggi disponibili consistono perlopiuin adozioni acritiche di modelli sviluppatiper le imprese private. In conclusionesono dunque fornite delle lineeguidaper le ricerche future e alcuneindicazioni di Policy.

Suggested Citation

  • FIASO Federazione Asl e Ospedali, 2017. "Knowledge Management e modelli strategici in sanit?. Una review strutturata della letteratura," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(103), pages 73-91.
    • Handle: RePEc:fan:mesame:v:html10.3280/mesa2017-103005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/Scheda_Rivista.aspx?IDArticolo=62416&Tipo=ArticoloPDF
    Download Restriction: Single articles can be downloaded buying download credits, for info: https://www.francoangeli.it/DownloadCredit
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cacace, Mirella & Ettelt, Stefanie & Mays, Nicholas & Nolte, Ellen, 2013. "Assessing quality in cross-country comparisons of health systems and policies: Towards a set of generic quality criteria," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 156-162.
    2. Ferlie, Ewan & Crilly, Tessa & Jashapara, Ashok & Peckham, Anna, 2012. "Knowledge mobilisation in healthcare: A critical review of health sector and generic management literature," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(8), pages 1297-1304.
    3. Varabyova, Yauheniya & Schreyögg, Jonas, 2013. "International comparisons of the technical efficiency of the hospital sector: Panel data analysis of OECD countries using parametric and non-parametric approaches," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 70-79.
    4. Tomoyoshi Yamazaki & Katsuhiro Umemoto, 2010. "Knowledge Management of Healthcare by Clinical-Pathways," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(02), pages 119-125.
    5. Mohammad Soltani Delgosha & Ali Amoei Ojaki & Hamidreza Farhadi, 2013. "The Business Values of Patient Knowledge Management (PKM) in the Healthcare Industry," International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics (IJHISI), IGI Global, vol. 8(2), pages 70-79, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. FIASO Federazione Asl e Ospedali, 2018. "Knowledge Management e modelli strategici in sanit?. Una review strutturata della letteratura," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(103), pages 97-115.
    2. Annika Maren Schneider & Eva-Maria Oppel & Jonas Schreyögg, 2020. "Investigating the link between medical urgency and hospital efficiency – Insights from the German hospital market," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 649-660, December.
    3. Valtteri Kaartemo & Helena Känsäkoski, 2018. "Information and Knowledge Processes in Health Care Value Co-Creation and Co-Destruction," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(4), pages 21582440188, December.
    4. Benito, Bernardino & Guillamón, María-Dolores & Martínez-Córdoba, Pedro-José, 2020. "Determinants of efficiency improvement in the Spanish public lighting sector," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    5. Santos, João Vasco & Martins, Filipa Santos & Pestana, Joana & Souza, Júlio & Freitas, Alberto & Cylus, Jonathan, 2023. "Should we adjust health expenditure for age structure on health systems efficiency? A worldwide analysis," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118298, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Alonso, José M. & Clifton, Judith & Díaz-Fuentes, Daniel, 2015. "The impact of New Public Management on efficiency: An analysis of Madrid's hospitals," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(3), pages 333-340.
    7. Johannessen, Karl Arne & Kittelsen, Sverre A.C. & Hagen, Terje P., 2017. "Assessing physician productivity following Norwegian hospital reform: A panel and data envelopment analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 117-126.
    8. Sverre Kittelsen & Benny Winsnes & Kjartan Anthun & Fanny Goude & Øyvind Hope & Unto Häkkinen & Birgitte Kalseth & Jannie Kilsmark & Emma Medin & Clas Rehnberg & Hanna Rättö, 2015. "Decomposing the productivity differences between hospitals in the Nordic countries," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 281-293, June.
    9. Alexandra Edelman & Judy Taylor & Pavel V. Ovseiko & Stephanie M. Topp, 2019. "“‘Academic’ is a dirty word”: Intended impact pathways of an emerging academic health centre in tropical regional Australia," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 661-678, January.
    10. Ayhan Aydın, 2022. "Benchmarking healthcare systems of OECD countries: A DEA - based Malmquist Productivity Index Approach," Alphanumeric Journal, Bahadir Fatih Yildirim, vol. 10(1), pages 25-40, June.
    11. Behrendt, Katja & Groene, Oliver, 2016. "Mechanisms and effects of public reporting of surgeon outcomes: A systematic review of the literature," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(10), pages 1151-1161.
    12. Yusuf Çelik & Mahmud Khan & Neşet Hikmet, 2017. "Achieving value for money in health: a comparative analysis of OECD countries and regional countries," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 279-298, October.
    13. Yauheniya Varabyova & Jonas Schreyögg, 2018. "Integrating quality into the nonparametric analysis of efficiency: a simulation comparison of popular methods," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 261(1), pages 365-392, February.
    14. Pourmahmoud, Jafar & Bagheri, Narges, 2023. "Uncertain Malmquist productivity index: An application to evaluate healthcare systems during COVID-19 pandemic," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).
    15. Laura Botega & Mônica Viegas Andrade & Gilvan Ramalho Guedes, 2020. "Brazilian hospitals’ performance: an assessment of the unified health system (SUS)," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 443-452, September.
    16. Kosycarz, Ewa & Dędys, Monika & Ekes, Maria & Wranik, Wiesława Dominika, 2023. "The effects of provider contract types and fiscal decentralization on the efficiency of the Polish hospital sector: A data envelopment analysis across 16 health regions," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    17. Matthias Klumpp & Dominic Loske & Silvio Bicciato, 2022. "COVID-19 health policy evaluation: integrating health and economic perspectives with a data envelopment analysis approach," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 23(8), pages 1263-1285, November.
    18. Roehrich, Jens K. & Lewis, Michael A. & George, Gerard, 2014. "Are public–private partnerships a healthy option? A systematic literature review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 110-119.
    19. Sepideh Abolghasem & Mehdi Toloo & Santiago Amézquita, 2019. "Cross-efficiency evaluation in the presence of flexible measures with an application to healthcare systems," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 512-533, September.
    20. Victor Ngobeni & Marthinus C. Breitenbach & Goodness C. Aye, 2020. "Technical Efficiency of Provincial Public Healthcare in South Africa," Working Papers 202013, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fan:mesame:v:html10.3280/mesa2017-103005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefania Rosato (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/sommario.aspx?IDRivista=180 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.