IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejlsjr/70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nominal Group Technique: a Brainstorming Tool for Identifying Learning Activities Using Musical Instruments to Enhance Creativity and Imagination of Young Children

Author

Listed:
  • Abdul Talib Hashim

    (National Child Development Research Center, Sultan Idris Education University (UPSI), Malaysia)

  • Azli Ariffin
  • Abdul Razalli
  • Abd Aziz Shukor
  • Mohd Nizamnasrifan
  • Abu Bakar Yusof

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify consensus by experts on appropriate activities to enhance the development of preschool children's imagination through the use of musical instruments. In order to obtain an in-depth understanding of teachers’ conceptions on imagination in creativity development and their beliefs about the best way to promote imagination in the classroom, the nominal group technique (NGT) was used to structure each focus group meeting. Finding shows a list of activities that have been sorted according to ranking as determined by the experts. All the experts also believe that the list of activities can boost the child's imagination because such activities have the characteristics that suit well with children.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdul Talib Hashim & Azli Ariffin & Abdul Razalli & Abd Aziz Shukor & Mohd Nizamnasrifan & Abu Bakar Yusof, 2016. "Nominal Group Technique: a Brainstorming Tool for Identifying Learning Activities Using Musical Instruments to Enhance Creativity and Imagination of Young Children," European Journal of Language and Literature Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 2, May - Aug.
    • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejlsjr:70
    DOI: 10.26417/ejls.v5i1.p46-53
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistia.org/index.php/ejls/article/view/5716
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://revistia.org/files/articles/ejls_v2_i2_16/abdul.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26417/ejls.v5i1.p46-53?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fink, A. & Kosecoff, J. & Chassin, M. & Brook, R.H., 1984. "Consensus methods: Characteristics and guidelines for use," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 74(9), pages 979-983.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shannon Li & Anne Honey & Francesca Coniglio & Peter Schaecken, 2022. "Mental Health Peer Worker Perspectives on Resources Developed from Lived Experience Research Findings: A Delphi Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Dana Hübelová & Martina Kuncová & Hana Vojáčková & Jitka Coufalová & Alice Kozumplíková & Francois Stefanus Lategan & Beatrice-Elena Chromková Manea, 2021. "Inequalities in Health: Methodological Approaches to Spatial Differentiation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-21, November.
    3. West, Allison & Duggan, Anne K. & Gruss, Kelsey & Minkovitz, Cynthia S., 2018. "Creating a measurement framework for service coordination in maternal and early childhood home visiting: An evidence-informed, expert process," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 289-297.
    4. Sundmacher, Leonie & Fischbach, Diana & Schuettig, Wiebke & Naumann, Christoph & Augustin, Uta & Faisst, Cristina, 2015. "Which hospitalisations are ambulatory care-sensitive, to what degree, and how could the rates be reduced? Results of a group consensus study in Germany," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(11), pages 1415-1423.
    5. Gabel, Matthew J. & Shipan, Charles R., 2004. "A social choice approach to expert consensus panels," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 543-564, May.
    6. Mitra Hannani & Marc Bascompta & Mojtaba Gerami Sabzevar & Hesam Dehghani & Ali Asghar Khajevandi, 2023. "Causal Analysis of Safety Risk Perception of Iranian Coal Mining Workers Using Fuzzy Delphi and DEMATEL," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-19, September.
    7. Otto H. Swank & Bauke Visser, 2009. "Decision Making and Learning in a Globalizing World," Economics Working Papers ECO2009/20, European University Institute.
    8. Marzieh Fallah & Lanndon Ocampo, 2021. "The use of the Delphi method with non-parametric analysis for identifying sustainability criteria and indicators in evaluating ecotourism management: the case of Penang National Park (Malaysia)," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 45-62, March.
    9. Violaine Smaïl-Faugeron & Hélène Fron Chabouis & Pierre Durieux & Jean-Pierre Attal & Michèle Muller-Bolla & Frédéric Courson, 2013. "Development of a Core Set of Outcomes for Randomized Controlled Trials with Multiple Outcomes – Example of Pulp Treatments of Primary Teeth for Extensive Decay in Children," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, January.
    10. Ravonne A. Green, 2014. "The Delphi Technique in Educational Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(2), pages 21582440145, April.
    11. Sharon Barak & Tzlil Rabinovitz & Achinoam Ben Akiva-Maliniak & Rony Schenker & Lian Meiry & Riki Tesler, 2022. "An Individually Tailored Program to Increase Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors among the Elderly," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-12, September.
    12. Justus N Agumba, 2015. "Validating and Identifying Health and Safety Performance Improvement Indicators: Experience of Using Delphi Technique," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 7(3), pages 14-22.
    13. Shani, Segev & Siebzehner, Miriam Ines & Luxenburg, Osnat & Shemer, Joshua, 2000. "Setting priorities for the adoption of health technologies on a national level -- the Israeli experience," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 169-185, December.
    14. Otto H. Swank & Bauke Visser, 2015. "Learning from Others? Decision Rights, Strategic Communication, and Reputational Concerns," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 7(4), pages 109-149, November.
    15. Caleb Chidozie Chinedu & Atif Saleem & Wan Hanim Nadrah Wan Muda, 2023. "Teaching and Learning Approaches: Curriculum Framework for Sustainability Literacy for Technical and Vocational Teacher Training Programmes in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, January.
    16. Sara McQuinn & Marie Delnord & Mary Rose Sweeney & Anthony Staines, 2020. "Making the Lives of Children and Young People More Visible in Europe. Consensus on Child and Young People’s Health and Well-Being Indicators for Europe: A Delphi Process," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 13(3), pages 951-966, June.
    17. Ruth Colagiuri & Sinead Boylan & Emily Morrice, 2015. "Research Priorities for NCD Prevention and Climate Change: An International Delphi Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, October.
    18. Derek Stewart & Kathrine Gibson-Smith & Katie MacLure & Alpana Mair & Albert Alonso & Carles Codina & Antonio Cittadini & Fernando Fernandez-Llimos & Glenda Fleming & Dimitra Gennimata & Ulrika Gilles, 2017. "A modified Delphi study to determine the level of consensus across the European Union on the structures, processes and desired outcomes of the management of polypharmacy in older people," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, November.
    19. Elisabeta Ioana Hiriscau & Nicola Stingelin-Giles & Danuta Wasserman & Stella Reiter-Theil, 2016. "Identifying Ethical Issues in Mental Health Research with Minors Adolescents: Results of a Delphi Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, May.
    20. Hiram Ting & Winnie Wong & Ernest Run, 2016. "Complaint Behaviour between Generations and Its Transmissions: An Exploratory Study in Malaysia," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(11), pages 279-279, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejlsjr:70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revistia Research and Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://revistia.org/index.php/ejls .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.