IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxvy2022i2p645-654.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Gen Z Question the Wisdom of Returning to the office? Results of the Research Conducted During the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Youngest Generation of Employees

Author

Listed:
  • Barbara Chomatowska
  • Iwona Janiak-Rejno

Abstract

Purpose: The main goal of the article is to identify premises influencing the decisions of young employees regarding the choice of the form of work organization after their experience of remote work in an uncertain time of SARS-CoV-2. Design/Methodology/Approach: The authors conducted a diagnostic survey with a survey questionnaire. The questionnaire was carried out using the CAWI method. It was filled in by 310 respondents who represent Generation Z, are professionally active and worked remotely during the pandemic. Findings: The surveyed employees - representatives of Generation Z, adapted very well to the conditions of remote work during the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result of this form of work organization, they have different experiences, both positive and negative. However, they do not allow for an unequivocal answer to the question: Are the young question returning to the office? For many, remote work will remain an attractive and the most desirable solution. In their opinion, companies offering it to employees will be more competitive than other organizations. The representatives of Gen Z are also aware of some benefits that can be brought by working at the company's premises, especially when they are just starting their professional careers. Considering the above opinions of Gen Z employees, many companies decide to use indirect solutions - a hybrid work organization, combining the advantages of remote and stationary work. Originality/Value: Leaders today are facing an unprecedented, challenging situation: how to understand, lead, manage, and motivate Generation Z working remotely. The research results shall contribute to the debate on what young employees (Gen Z) expect, need, and want in a remote work environment. The research based-understanding of these is a pivotal step to leading them effectively and making appropriate and satisfactory choices for all interested parties regarding current and future forms of work organization.

Suggested Citation

  • Barbara Chomatowska & Iwona Janiak-Rejno, 2022. "Does Gen Z Question the Wisdom of Returning to the office? Results of the Research Conducted During the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Youngest Generation of Employees," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 645-654.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxv:y:2022:i:2:p:645-654
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/2986/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michal Beňo & Jan Kříž & Dagmar Cagáňová, 2024. "A Perspective on E-workers’ Preferences and Experiences: A Case Study," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 13, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Generation Z; remote work; hybrid work; HRM.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M54 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics - - - Labor Management
    • J21 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Labor Force and Employment, Size, and Structure
    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxv:y:2022:i:2:p:645-654. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.